LOL michelle malkin was an anchor baby

[lilbawler2001]

[Previous: Further to RFK, Jr. Article Linked in Previous Post
Next: Terror In Canada ... Just FYI

Michelle Malkin .. An Anchor Baby ?
by jonh on Sun 04 Jun 2006 08:52 AM PDT | Permanent Link | Cosmos
Michelle Malkin is one of the clearest example of hate-mindedness (Yes, I know it's not a word) on the Web today. She regularly rants against brwon and Asian people, against any liberalism in immigration policy, and is vehemently anti-Muslim.

As this wonderful post (thanks, Spittle & Ink) outlines, it is deliciously funny in an ironic way to catch small-minded hateful people in hypocrisy. For me this story about Michelle's origins does the trick ... especially given what she has said about "anchor babies" and immigration.

Put simply, an anchor baby is the offspring of an illegal immigrant who, under current legal interpretation, becomes a U.S. citizen at birth and, in turn, is the means by which parents and relatives can also obtain citizenship for themselves by using the family reunification features of immigration law. (Link)

According to the facts, Doc Apolo arrived in the US under a work visa sometime in 1970, and Malkin was born "months" later, in October. Now it's conceivable that Doc Apolo arrived in the US in January, immediately knocked up the missus, and never intended on using the fetus as a convenience. It's conceivable, but unlikely. The window of opportunity there is just too small, and in all likelihood Doc Apolo arrived here with the full understanding that he was bringing with him a pregnant wife due to give birth sometime inside the term of his visa. But even if he didn't intend on little Michelle being a jackpot baby, the fact that he stayed in the US through October, rather than return to the Philippines like a good immigrant, means Michelle was a jackpot baby --- a fact which immediately granted Doc Apolo's caterwauling spawn legal US citizenship, and tossed a whole bunch of US rights into his family's lap.

What does Ms. Malkin have to say about "anchor babies"? Here's what:

During my book tour across the country for Invasion, this issue came up time and again. In the Southwest, everyone has a story of heavily pregnant women crossing the Mexican border to deliver their "anchor babies." At East Coast hospitals, tales of South Korean "obstetric tourists" abound. (An estimated 5,000 South Korean anchor babies are born in the US every year). And, of course, there's a terrorism angle.


Ouch. Okay, but Malkin's dad came over legally, right? So she's not technically an "anchor baby," is she?

Wrong. According to the Right-wing talking points on immigration, a baby born to immigrants here on work or travel visas is still an anchor baby, because the baby lubricates the "guest" worker's path to premature citizenship, and immediately heaps a load of Federal benefits on the baby-- all of which Michelle herself took advantage of, we can assume.

Hmmm ... self-loathing at its finest, triple-distilled ?

Tags: Michelle Malkin, hypocrisy, anchor babies, hate propaganda

Posted to: Main Page

wow what a hypocrite she is. now that she's had her piece of the american dream, she's complaining about undocumented having babies here. if she and her alipac croonies had their way she wouldnt even had been a citizen.

[lilbawler2001]

another interesting article

Is Michelle Malkin an Illegal Alien?
Alright, this one is not satire, folks. Let me say that up front.

My crack reporting (eww!) on Michelle Malkin being an anchor baby — the child of immigrants whose birth in the US immediately bestows special citizenship rights on the parents — has caused a lot of internet buzz, especially given Ms. Malkin’s chosen profession of immigrant bashing, and her open musings that anchor babies might be terrorists. I’ve been flooded with additional information on this, all of which continues to suggest that Malkin is, in fact, an anchor baby, brought to the US from the Phillippines in the belly of her heavily-laden mother just months before her birth.

However, some new public records obtained by Spittle & Ink — and I want to emphasize that these are legit records, even if the data on them could be erroneous — suggests that Malkin may not be an anchor baby, but rather a full-on illegal immigrant. Birth records (*) for “Michelle Magalalang” show three entries, only one of which aligns with Malkin’s stated birth year of 1970. The other two list her as having been born in 1967 — three years before her parents reportedly came to the US.

If true, not only would this mean the Right’s favorite Asian cutiepie is in her forties — practically a senior citizen… yuck! — but it would also mean that one of the following scenarios is likely true: first, that Apolo Maglalang and his wife smuggled a three year old Michelle into the country, and later declared her as being born in the US to obtain citizenship, or second that Michelle Malkin has openly lied in various interviews and articles on the facts of her origin. In either case, given that Malkin is so vehement in her criticism of immigrants to this country, it behooves her to come clean.

Now I do want to reiterate: because we are dealing with public records, which are notoriously incorrect a lot of the time, this 1967 birth date may not be true. However, that two sources cite 1967, and only one cites 1970 — well that’s worth pricking up your ears for. And no one has his ears pricked up more than me.

Again, if Malkin hadn’t made a career at shitting on immigrants to this country, both legal and otherwise, this would not be an issue. But she has made that her raison d’etre (oops, used a French term!) and her silence on the anchor baby accusations — yes, I’ve sent her umpteen notices on my reporting here, and she’s not responded once — combined with the misinformation in the public record on her date of birth… well, she needs to say something. And prove it, too.

If she does, she can put to bed the rumors that she is a self-loathing anchor baby whore, which would do wonders for her otherwise dubious reputation and guttermuck career.

If she does not come clean, then expect more fun with her, right here on Spittle & Ink. As we wait, I will continue to gather evidence, and welcome any you all, my dear Spittledroogs, send me, presuming it’s verifiable and true.

For the full Michelle Malkin cycle of S + I reporting, click here.

* UPDATE / CORRECTION: That should read “records including her birth date…” not “birth records.” What I meant is that various official records for Malkin have three different birth dates on them, not that there are three different birth certificates out there. Did that make sense? No? Great… then you know how I feel when I read Drudge.

Rudely

[rock steady]

She's a disgrace to the Filipinos across the U.S.

[fldude13]

ummm.... who's Michelle Malkin?

[jellybeans]

She's a disgrace to the Filipinos across the U.S.

seriously.

[juang]

ummm.... who's Michelle Malkin?

I was going to ask the same question, but didn't because then everyone would know that I hadn't read the article above.

but anyways, who's Michelle Malkin?

[lilbawler2001]

shes usually on fox news railling against undocumented immigrants and people who have babies here who are not legal residents. u know the alipac crowd refers to them us anchor babies. the funny thing is she is one herself and she has the nerves to be an asian lou dobbs.

[Nick]

an asian lou dobbs.

I dont know who she is, but thats just a funny title. :lol:

[HOPEFULDREAMER]

Look her up on google. She's a total tard.


She even wrote a book defending ASIAN DETENTION during WW2 in the US. Apparently someone hasn't looked in the mirror since the beginning of her life. :roll:

[Nick]

I think hippocrate would've covered it, but an Asian Lou Dobs sounds way cooler. :D

[fldude13]

Actually, i think i saw her earlier today on Fox News while they were talking about immigration... I'd hit it :)

[HOPEFULDREAMER]

LOL...you know, my brother said the EXACT same thing when he saw her on TV. There's a picture of her circulating on the internet with the title "Michelle Malkin gone WILD" lol. It's pretty hilarious since she's Ms. Ultra-Conservative. :)

[rock steady]

She's a no-good sellout. I would rather kiss a donkey's ass than touch that dirty pirate hooker.

[juang]

You mean this picture?

http://upload8.postimage.org/419733/mm.jpg (http://upload8.postimage.org/419733/photo_hosting.html)


or this one?


http://upload8.postimage.org/419738/mm2.jpg (http://upload8.postimage.org/419738/photo_hosting.html)

[frbc13]

i'll send that dumb woman to hell!!!!!!!!......................right after i tap that thang.

[HOPEFULDREAMER]

Uh-huh JuanG. That's the one lol.


But I do agree with rocksteady. She's one of those people that will be debating you and you just want to reach over and punch her in the face repeatedly. Her voice is ridiculously annoying.

[fldude13]

Edited.

II. Posting GUIDELINES


1. Make sure you post in the right forum.
2. Try to use proper grammar and write clearly.
3. Try to stay on topic. If you have something off topic to say, do not hesitate to create another thread in the appropriate section.
4. This forum will not censor explicit language, but we ask that you refrain from using it unnecessarily.


lol i got censored :lol: seriously, though, she's hawt






































... Giggity!