![]() |
Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
......
|
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
I posted this on FB yesterday. Freaking hilarious. Lol
This was my favorite Daily Show clip this week. |
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
Awesome video. I will post on Facebook too. Frkn hillarious
|
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
Never mind I can't get the link from my phone
|
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
He was doing well until he tried to equate government hand outs and Investor tax breaks.
|
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
Quote:
|
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
Quote:
Now this is a pretty cool thing cuz then investors can pump money into your publicly traded company by buying stocks, or futures, or options, or bonds, or whatever. Same deal with a business....the government is saying, since you had the balls to try this thing which may have gone belly up, but is instead creating jobs, we'll tax you at capital gain, cuz even though it's making millions, it could've cost you millions just the same. This way you can expand it even more and hopefully hire more ppl. Even though there are some companies that were built on dreams and aspirations (thinking disney here); the truth is that you gotta reward initiative in order to have any. Nobody takes a gamble if the odds are the same as the sure thing (like a paycheck). Equating a food stamp to what I just described is patronizing and quite frankly a little insulting. Stewart is making the same mistake as republicans make when they call healthcare a 'handout'. Honestly, instead of hating on Capital Gain, ppl should figure out how to get in on the game....but then again ppl are just jealous haters. |
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
I think he was equating tax breaks to tax breaks
|
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
Quote:
|
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
Quote:
|
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
Quote:
You take away their reason for investing in new companies and they'll just move the money abroad where the climate isn't hostile and they'll wait out whichever administration is in power. The investor tax break rewards bold initiative on high risk investments, why should we expect a high risk job (cops, diving welders, miners, etc...) to have a low salary for example? What kills me is that both parties tell lies, the Republicans tell a heck of a lot of them (big and small) so it's easy to call them out on their bs. The democrats tell a whole lot of truth and then throw a big lie in there from time to time....people then believe that the truth is that simple because they trust the source. I almost feel they play a more dangerous game. It's like the whole Romney thing when he said 'corporations are people too'....The left ran with it, but failed to mention that in the IRS eyes, a corporation is a new entity created out of thin air, and is treated for all intents and purposes, as a physical person. So cliffnotes: Government handouts (in the form of aid of any sort): Taxed revenue being given out. Tax break: We'll take less tax revenue from certain folk. On the surface, that seems unfair since those 'certain folk' are paying a smaller percentage of their income; that is until you realize that the top 5% are responsible for 59% of income tax revenue. |
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
......
|
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
Dividend tax rates are set to increase next year and what that will do is cause a lot of money to pour out of dividend focused funds, and every component of the Dow 30. Are they going to fail? no. Most likely they'll figure out new ways to redistribute earnings back to the investors. Stock buybacks are all the rage now.
But I agree with Ali. You shouldn't tax capital gains at the same rate as income. Investment is what fuels savings AND growth. Look at FRED data charting savings rates v. investment rates. It's almost a perfect correlation. With less lucrative investments to be found (because of the higher taxes), banks are going to be less willing to pay a handsome interest rate on your savings account. The result means you save less. Why place so much money in a savings account that's earning next to nothing when you can presumably attain more utility from consuming now. The end game is a low national savings rates which tend to coincide with deeper troughs. You're more likely to suffer a lot more if you have no savings during a recession. |
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
Quote:
U can't condemn one and not the other is all im saying. The republicans praise the ground the investors walk on, and spit on everyone else that takes anything from the government. That's where my argument lies. U cannot say ALL people who take from the government is lazy and feel like their entitled and say that giving tax breaks to investors is fine. Getting benefits from the government is taking benefits, end of story. Also saying i will take less money from u is essentially the same as saying im "giving u this money back." I dont get how u dont understand where im coming from. Believe me, i understand what ur saying. |
Re: Chaos on Bullshit Mountain
^^i get what you mean....essentially I see 'handouts' as the bigger evil (economically speaking) since there's only individual benefit from them (or family involved), unlike a tax break that essentially benefits a company along w/the investors; hence my beef w/equating them.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.