DREAM Act Portal Forum

DREAM Act Portal Forum (http://dreamact.info/forum/index.php)
-   The News Room (http://dreamact.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s cons (http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=85137)

Dreamer1980 09-20-2021 12:51 PM

Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s cons
 
https://chicago.suntimes.com/2021/9/...on-budget-bill

• Durbin is the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the founder of the crusade to give legal status to Dreamers, people who came to the U.S. illegally as youths through no fault of their own. In a joint statement with Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., chair of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, and Border Safety, Durbin said, “We are deeply disappointed in the Parliamentarian’s decision, but the fight for immigration reform will continue. Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s consideration in the coming days.”

• Rep. Jesus “Chuy” Garcia, D-Ill., said in a statement, “I am deeply disappointed by the Senate parliamentarian’s decision against including a pathway to citizenship in budget reconciliation. But the fight is far from over. We are prepared for this, we have a plan, and we remain optimistic. The parliamentarian ruled against one approach but Senate Democrats have the final say. We must do right by the immigrants who have kept our country going during the pandemic, including the over 40,000 DACA recipients, TPS holders, farm workers, and essential workers in my district who help our communities thrive. I will not stop fighting until they have a pathway to citizenship in the country they call home, and I urge the Senate to have the courage to overrule this decision.

dgx21 09-20-2021 01:06 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
So what can they change in this alternative proposal that will affect the budget and not be incidental? I thought the 8 million people claiming food stamps was the only way that could happen. What else can they do?

Blackfyre 09-20-2021 01:10 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dgx21 (Post 763964)
So what can they change in this alternative proposal that will affect the budget and not be incidental? I thought the 8 million people claiming food stamps was the only way that could happen. What else can they do?

You didn't read what the parliamentarian said. She acknowledged there was a budgetary impact beyond being incidental. She claimed however that the other impacts far outweighed the budgetary impact however.

Afridi786 09-20-2021 01:10 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dgx21 (Post 763964)
So what can they change in this alternative proposal that will affect the budget and not be incidental? I thought the 8 million people claiming food stamps was the only way that could happen. What else can they do?

So us being happy far outweighs the budgetary impact. But if they only codify DACA into law, she'll say there won't be enough budgetary impact. I can already see this being her next argument to fuck us.

lurkingpro 09-20-2021 01:19 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
it goes on and on and on...the vicious cycle

Outsider626 09-20-2021 01:58 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
See ya in 2041

Imthexman 09-20-2021 02:59 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
This plan b be makes absolutely no sense, so the dems are going to ask Lord Elizabeth to allow a fraction of the original 8 million and residency instead of citizenship and she is going to cave? And then plan c would be to ask Lord Elizabeth to allow the dems to update the registry date? Lol

This is sad but freaking comical.

vft1008 09-20-2021 03:02 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Outsider626 (Post 763986)
See ya in 2041

Careful. You will trigger some sensitive people here by "killing morale".

Got_Daca 09-20-2021 03:44 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
8 million was way too big of a number

Essential workers including Uber eats drivers? LMAO of course no.

Stick to DACAs only

Copper 09-20-2021 03:55 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Got_Daca (Post 763992)
8 million was way too big of a number

Essential workers including Uber eats drivers? LMAO of course no.

Stick to DACAs only

I don’t do UBER eats but damn why shouldn’t they? People were scared to go out and get stuff done in person so technically they should qualify because delivery people were a huge part of the pandemic.

Afridi786 09-20-2021 03:56 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Got_Daca (Post 763992)
8 million was way too big of a number

Essential workers including Uber eats drivers? LMAO of course no.

Stick to DACAs only

But she said that since legalization would make an huge impact in the life of immigrants that it outweighs the 100+ billion dollars. With that logic, even one person being legalized would outweigh any budgetary impact. She's not budging, she probably got the direction from her political masters.

Blackfyre 09-20-2021 04:04 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Copper (Post 763994)
I don’t do UBER eats but damn why shouldn’t they? People were scared to go out and get stuff done in person so technically they should qualify because delivery people were a huge part of the pandemic.

The way people in this forum think about non-DACAers is the same way republicans thing about all immigrants.

Chn 09-20-2021 04:05 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
The parliamentarian seemed very focused on the essential worker provision:

Quote:

The current proposal would waive the relevant sections of the INA,
and create a new class of alien who is eligible for adjustment of status, including a wholly new
category of persons called “essential critical infrastructure workers” (derived from a 16 page list
that covers 18 major categories and over 220 sub-categories of employment). The provision also
includes conditions of ineligibility for these applicants along with waivers of many of those
disqualifiers at the discretion of DHS. It is by any standard a broad, new immigration policy.
I'd say removing the essential worker provision and just focusing on the DACA could probably pass the Byrd Rule? I think you can justify converting an EAD to a LPR.

ralsingh 09-20-2021 04:17 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Trying to push immigration into a reconciliation bill was a political move by Dems. Parliamentarian has questioned the entire concept of legalizing the undocumented, and not just the numbers/approach, etc.

I can't think of any way around this within reconciliation, unfortunately, as long as the outcome of the policy change is giving green cards. [The whole registry date approach is nonsensical]. Reconciliation is not the vehicle for it.

My position on immigration reform is work on targeted bills, not a ginormous immigration reform. Start with the low hanging fruit of active DACA recipients, etc. (I am selfish :)) .

Democrats should have focused on smaller "wins" every year, let's say. But they chose political noise over practicality.

Now Democrats will go into midterms saying "we tried but the parliamentarian let us down." At which point, the voters will ask "who the hell is the parliamentarian", and they will vote them out!

VJB2 09-20-2021 04:19 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ralsingh (Post 763998)
Trying to push immigration into a reconciliation bill was a political move by Dems. Parliamentarian has questioned the entire concept of legalizing the undocumented, and not just the numbers/approach, etc.

I can't think of any way around this within reconciliation, unfortunately, as long as the outcome of the policy change is giving green cards. [The whole registry date approach is nonsensical]. Reconciliation is not the vehicle for it.

My position on immigration reform is work on targeted bills, not a ginormous immigration reform. Start with the low hanging fruit of active DACA recipients, etc. (I am selfish :)) .

Democrats should have focused on smaller "wins" every year, let's say. But they chose political noise over practicality.

Now Democrats will go into midterms saying "we tried but the parliamentarian let us down." At which point, the voters will ask "who the hell is the parliamentarian", and they will vote them out!

If it was that simple, it would have been done. Good luck finding enough votes in the Senate.

Got_Daca 09-20-2021 04:25 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chn (Post 763997)
The parliamentarian seemed very focused on the essential worker provision:



I'd say removing the essential worker provision and just focusing on the DACA could probably pass the Byrd Rule? I think you can justify converting an EAD to a LPR.

Exactly.

EW clause is what makes it so onerous.

ralsingh 09-20-2021 04:39 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Got_Daca (Post 764000)
Exactly.

EW clause is what makes it so onerous.

If latest news is to be followed, next "proposal" is Dreamers only immigration. If by Dreamers they strictly mean active and eligible DACA recipient, then the keys points are:

1. All DACA recipients either have an EAD or can get one. From EAD to LPR is not as big of a change as going from nothing to LPR. [Is this too big of a policy change???]

2. Giving DACA recipients permanent residency, will it have a big enough budgetary impact????

None of this looks promising.

Afridi786 09-20-2021 04:43 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ralsingh (Post 764001)
If latest news is to be followed, next "proposal" is Dreamers only immigration. If by Dreamers they strictly mean active and eligible DACA recipient, then the keys points are:

1. All DACA recipients either have an EAD or can get one. From EAD to LPR is not as big of a change as going from nothing to LPR. [Is this too big of a policy change???]

2. Giving DACA recipients permanent residency, will it have a big enough budgetary impact????

None of this looks promising.

She pretty much signaled that she's a no regardless of the argument.

frbc13 09-20-2021 04:48 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Parliamentarian: "It's gonna be a no for me dawg"

VJB2 09-20-2021 04:51 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
https://i.imgur.com/X8pAUFl.png

2dreamORnot2dream 09-20-2021 05:05 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
https://youtu.be/nFTRwD85AQ4

Got_Daca 09-20-2021 05:31 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Honestly can't wait till I am off of Dems balls.

Smooth 09-20-2021 05:52 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VJB2 (Post 764004)

Fucking Republican. How dare she

Smooth 09-20-2021 06:01 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
@AOC
·
1h
Some of the options are:

- Ignore/override the parliamentarian. Their determination is not a “ruling,” it is guidance.
- Fire the parliamentarian (GOP did this in ‘01)
- Edit the legislative language & review different paths (this is sometimes doable, sometimes not)

dreamer12345 09-20-2021 08:00 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
40k?
fuck you and your 40k

JavierHTx 09-20-2021 09:19 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
I won’t ever take any proposal seriously unless it’s DACA only.

Even Breitbart writers like us.

https://twitter.com/brandondarby/sta...262326785?s=21

Quote:

I know this isn’t a popular opinion in my circles, and I know it’s anecdotal, but all of the DACA recipients I’ve personally known have been stellar human beings and we’re lucky to have them here, IMO.

PapiChulo 09-20-2021 09:50 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JavierHTx (Post 764022)
I won’t ever take any proposal seriously unless it’s DACA only.

Even Breitbart writers like us.

https://twitter.com/brandondarby/sta...262326785?s=21

good shit.

Demise 09-20-2021 10:36 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Schumer never fails to disappoint. Dude should give her 2 proposals:
Proposal 1 being the same as the last one
Proposal 2 being a McDonald's job application

Copper 09-21-2021 12:57 AM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
The fact that you have prominent Democrats defending the parliamentary says everything we need to know. They wanted her to make that decision to keep the whole immigration issue of their back.

JayR9 09-21-2021 02:11 AM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Fuck Democrats and their bills.

Imthexman 09-21-2021 08:45 AM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Still amazes me how the dems want to believe that the faith of their proposals are up to1 staffer.

I can just imagine how ridiculous their statement is going to be when the Parliamentarian shutdown all their proposals "Sadly the Parliamentarian does not agree with our proposals, we'll continue to work on solving this issue for these wonderful people who were brought here as children without fault of their own, they contribute to our society, they pay their taxes, they are our beloved neighbors, first responders blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. It f-ing socks to be in this situation!

Sorrybrah 09-21-2021 09:00 AM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Copper (Post 764041)
The fact that you have prominent Democrats defending the parliamentary says everything we need to know. They wanted her to make that decision to keep the whole immigration issue of their back.

Yea man... Part of me thinks we had the vote count (or close to it) so they had to introduce blockers like this staffer. What's next? Schumer's dog not agreeing with the next immigration bill? Lol

Smooth 09-21-2021 10:53 AM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
If this fails because Dems failed to garner support from Manchin and Sinema, so be it. But, don’t fucking insult our intelligence by making the parliamentarian seem like a huge roadblock when she really isn’t. Don’t insult our intelligence with these bullshit theatrics. That’s what the problem is to some of us barking at Dem leadership in the Senate. We aren’t fucking children and idiot Trump supporters.

lurkingpro 09-21-2021 11:15 AM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Blackfyre (Post 763996)
The way people in this forum think about non-DACAers is the same way republicans thing about all immigrants.

spot on! pretty sad to see.

moto 09-21-2021 11:49 AM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Smooth (Post 764048)
If this fails because Dems failed to garner support from Manchin and Sinema, so be it. But, don’t fucking insult our intelligence by making the parliamentarian seem like a huge roadblock when she really isn’t. Don’t insult our intelligence with these bullshit theatrics. That’s what the problem is to some of us barking at Dem leadership in the Senate. We aren’t fucking children and idiot Trump supporters.

Right. If it fails the vote then so be it. But if it doesn’t even come up because some fking nobody suggested you can’t do it, then screw democrats. Just bunch of loud mouths

vft1008 09-21-2021 01:56 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
If we all had the balls of 1960's Vietnam war protestors and organized and rallied and applied pressure rather than us being keyboard warriors here, this would be be ancient history and we would be on the road to legalization now. Instead we have Harris and Biden having lunch with UWD and Durbin giving more speeches and tweeting.

Optics and public perception go such a long way in causing change. A nation-wide, positive Dreamer PR crusade would change things and drastically increase our chances here. We are pathetic.

ralsingh 09-21-2021 06:25 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Stick to DACA.

No Dreamers, Aged out DACA. None of that.

Just active DACA recipients. But that's too easy. Hence, Democrats probably won't do it.

JavierHTx 09-21-2021 07:42 PM

Re: Senate Democrats have prepared an alternative proposal for the Parliamentarian’s
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ralsingh (Post 764102)
Stick to DACA.

No Dreamers, Aged out DACA. None of that.

Just active DACA recipients. But that's too easy. Hence, Democrats probably won't do it.

No aged out DACA sounds cruel but the less people it benefits the better odds. I would still include aged out DACA. Infact I wouldn’t include anyone who hasn’t been here for at least 5 years and was brought before the age of 16.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.