DREAM Act Portal Forum

DREAM Act Portal Forum (http://dreamact.info/forum/index.php)
-   The Lounge (http://dreamact.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Who flip-flopped on Dream? (http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=6206)

Sam 10-25-2007 05:20 PM

Who flip-flopped on Dream?
 
Although the loss yesterday still causes tremendous amount of pain, but hey! AT LEAST WE GOT A VOTE, which has never happened before. So to certain extent, we ought to be thankful about the progress Dream is making. When I went throguh the voting records from yesterday, I noticed more than a few senators changed their positions on Dream which was very disappointing.

Among them are Specter, Grassley, Crapo, Pryor, Landrieu McCain. They are either current or past co-sponsors of Dream. I was the most disappointed about Specter and McCain's betrayal. I was very surprised to see Crapo and Grassley not voting for us. Although those who vote for the cloture will not be a guaranteed "yea" when the real vote occurs, I am still shocked to see these former allies would not even allow Dream to be debated.

On a positive note, these are also votes we could have had. If we do the math, 52+6 flipfloppers+ absentees, ( Kenneday and Boxer and maybe Dodd?), we would have over 60 votes to proceed.

This election year politics is ugly. How can McCain denounced Dream when he has always been a co-sponsor? This change of mind is saying alot about the person and also how he will be if he becomes a president. I used to admire how McCain is different from his conservative base and gave him a nod. But now we should just call him a big time flip-flopper. Specter's sellout is also disturbing, given that he has always been a strong supporter for Dream and CIR.

Once again, there are also positive signs that show the progress of Dream and where we are at this point. I firmly believe that we will have a good chance if we can convert those who sell out on us to flip-flop back to Dream, then there will be enough votes to overcome this hurdle.

mdhfinsc 10-25-2007 05:25 PM

Re: Who flip-flopped on Dream?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam
Although the loss yesterday still causes tremendous amount of pain, but hey! AT LEAST WE GOT A VOTE, which has never happened before. So to certain extent, we ought to be thankful about the progress Dream is making. When I went throguh the voting records from yesterday, I noticed more than a few senators changed their positions on Dream which was very disappointing.

Among them are Specter, Grassley, Crapo, Pryor, Landrieu McCain. They are either current or past co-sponsors of Dream. I was the most disappointed about Specter and McCain's betrayal. I was very surprised to see Crapo and Grassley not voting for us. Although those who vote for the cloture will not be a guaranteed "yea" when the real vote occurs, I am still shocked to see these former allies would not even allow Dream to be debated.

On a positive note, these are also votes we could have had. If we do the math, 52+6 flipfloppers+ absentees, ( Kenneday and Boxer and maybe Dodd?), we would have over 60 votes to proceed.

This election year politics is ugly. How can McCain denounced Dream when he has always been a co-sponsor? This change of mind is saying alot about the person and also how he will be if he becomes a president. I used to admire how McCain is different from his conservative base and gave him a nod. But now we should just call him a big time flip-flopper. Specter's sellout is also disturbing, given that he has always been a strong supporter for Dream and CIR.

Once again, there are also positive signs that show the progress of Dream and where we are at this point. I firmly believe that we will have a good chance if we can convert those who sell out on us to flip-flop back to Dream, then there will be enough votes to overcome this hurdle.

That's one thing, I still don't understand why President BUSH announced he would veto this bill, I don't understand this people, He wanted a CIR..I think he'd say: or is everthing or nothing at all.

greentea 10-25-2007 05:26 PM

flipflops hmm..
Pete Domenici

former co-sponsors that switched..
Mike Crapo
Mark Pryor

co-sponsors that did not vote..
John McCain(R)
Barbara Boxer(D)
Ted Kennedy(D)
Chris Dodd(D)

that were a toss-up but voted no..
Cornyn
Grassley
Specter
Landrieu

greentea 10-25-2007 05:28 PM

Re: Who flip-flopped on Dream?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mdhfinsc

That's one thing, I still don't understand why President BUSH announced he would veto this bill, I don't understand this people, He wanted a CIR..I think he'd say: or is everthing or nothing at all.

Source? I read it wasn't supported but it wasn't officially going to be veto'd

Jourbalist 10-25-2007 05:29 PM

Re: Who flip-flopped on Dream?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mdhfinsc
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam
Although the loss yesterday still causes tremendous amount of pain, but hey! AT LEAST WE GOT A VOTE, which has never happened before. So to certain extent, we ought to be thankful about the progress Dream is making. When I went throguh the voting records from yesterday, I noticed more than a few senators changed their positions on Dream which was very disappointing.

Among them are Specter, Grassley, Crapo, Pryor, Landrieu McCain. They are either current or past co-sponsors of Dream. I was the most disappointed about Specter and McCain's betrayal. I was very surprised to see Crapo and Grassley not voting for us. Although those who vote for the cloture will not be a guaranteed "yea" when the real vote occurs, I am still shocked to see these former allies would not even allow Dream to be debated.

On a positive note, these are also votes we could have had. If we do the math, 52+6 flipfloppers+ absentees, ( Kenneday and Boxer and maybe Dodd?), we would have over 60 votes to proceed.

This election year politics is ugly. How can McCain denounced Dream when he has always been a co-sponsor? This change of mind is saying alot about the person and also how he will be if he becomes a president. I used to admire how McCain is different from his conservative base and gave him a nod. But now we should just call him a big time flip-flopper. Specter's sellout is also disturbing, given that he has always been a strong supporter for Dream and CIR.

Once again, there are also positive signs that show the progress of Dream and where we are at this point. I firmly believe that we will have a good chance if we can convert those who sell out on us to flip-flop back to Dream, then there will be enough votes to overcome this hurdle.

That's one thing, I still don't understand why President BUSH announced he would veto this bill, I don't understand this people, He wanted a CIR..I think he'd say: or is everthing or nothing at all.

They had compelling reasons for wanting to veto it though. They say it could lead to a large scale documentation fraud. There was a statement I read in papers online and I understand why he'd veto it. Doesn't mean I want him to veto, just means that Durbin should come up with a more hardcore version of Dream so it doesn't look like amnesty.

mdhfinsc 10-25-2007 05:45 PM

Re: Who flip-flopped on Dream?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Valentine
They had compelling reasons for wanting to veto it though. They say it could lead to a large scale documentation fraud. There was a statement I read in papers online and I understand why he'd veto it. Doesn't mean I want him to veto, just means that Durbin should come up with a more hardcore version of Dream so it doesn't look like amnesty.

What kind of documentation fraud, we all have to prove we went to a US public schools.

Jourbalist 10-25-2007 06:54 PM

Re: Who flip-flopped on Dream?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mdhfinsc
Quote:

Originally Posted by Valentine
They had compelling reasons for wanting to veto it though. They say it could lead to a large scale documentation fraud. There was a statement I read in papers online and I understand why he'd veto it. Doesn't mean I want him to veto, just means that Durbin should come up with a more hardcore version of Dream so it doesn't look like amnesty.

What kind of documentation fraud, we all have to prove we went to a US public schools.

I have no idea of what kind of documentation fraud. White House said it. If I had to guess what kind of fraud, I'd say people will try to make up fake hs transcripts in order to prove they were here. I don't even know if you could do such thing.

CIR_DREAM2009 10-25-2007 06:56 PM

Its ironic that the arguments the White House used against the Dream Act were the arguments anti-immigration groups used against his CIR bill.

RahmanIV 10-25-2007 07:08 PM

Landrieu is the Senator who is in the greatest danger of losing her seat next election. She had to shore up her conservative base in Louisiana. I don't blame her for voting no. Though she does look quite attractive.

Ed 10-26-2007 03:45 AM

we won 52-44 but not enough to get the majority which sucks!. i thought the White House was not going to do that, since last time i heard bush was for the dream act


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.