![]() |
Bipartisan Group Looks to Split Difference on DACA Fix
A bipartisan bill that would bridge differences between two largely partisan measures to provide young undocumented immigrants with a path to citizenship and beef up border security could soon be forthcoming.
The Problem Solvers Caucus is working on legislation that would provide a compromise between the mostly Democratic-sponsored Dream Act and the GOP-led Recognizing America’s Children (RAC) Act, as well as a bipartisan border security proposal. Problem Solvers member Carlos Curbelo, author of the RAC Act, said the blended bill “is a very, obvious reasonable compromise.” For example, it would make the age of eligibility 17 for undocumented immigrants to qualify for legal status, splitting the difference between 16 as the RAC Act proposes and 18 as the Dream Act proposes. The Florida Republican said he discussed the compromise proposal Tuesday during a meeting of the moderate GOP Tuesday Group and centrist New Democrat Coalition. “Everyone in that room is for a compromise, and I’d say almost everyone in that room is for getting this done, no pride of authorship, however we get it done, let’s do it,” Curbelo said. Indeed, several members leaving the Tuesday Group/New Democrats meeting expressed optimism about a bipartisan path forward but acknowledged there is still work to do, including convincing party leaders. But those are the extreme viewpoints and many centrist members, particularly those in the Tuesday Group and New Democrat Coalition, believe there is a compromise to be had on legal status for undocumented immigrants and border security. Himes said both Democrats and Republicans in Tuesday’s meeting appeared “flexible.” The differences between the Dream Act and the RAC Act “are a matter of degree, not of basic principle, and so of course it’s bridgeable,” the Connecticut Democrat said, describing the degrees as the number of undocumented immigrants who would be covered and various procedures for them to obtain legal status and eventually citizenship. “It would certainly help if we got a commitment on the part of the leadership to make this happen,” Himes added. “It’s more complicated if they are indifferent or opposed. But this is an imminently solvable problem.” Curbelo described several obstacles on the bipartisan proposal: “There’s some waiting around. Some Problem Solvers Caucus members don’t want to file the bill yet. The Congressional Hispanic Caucus is applying pressure, saying, ‘Only Dream Act, clean Dream Act.’ And the speaker’s working group I don’t think still has a way forward.” Although Curbelo described the bill as ready for release, Problem Solvers Co-Chairmen Tom Reed, R-N.Y., and Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., said there’s still work to do. “We’ve spent a lot of hours together on this, we’re not there yet,” Gottheimer said, noting they have agreement on some but not all issues. “If we were just dealing with Carlos, I think [it’d] be a different spot. Some his colleagues on his side are still stuck on a few provisions,” he added, declining to specify those sticking points. Reed said both parties have contributed to the hold-up, noting there are still disagreements on both the DACA and border security pieces. “Every time we get very close, both sides tend to get there and all of a sudden they get a little hesitant, Reed said. “But that’s why we’re so close.” Reed said “hopefully pretty soon” the Problem Solvers Caucus will have an agreement on which they can take an official position. That requires support from at least 51 percent of the caucus’s 24 Democrats and 51 percent of the caucus’s 23 (soon to be 24) Republicans. Reed said Ryan is aware the Problems Solvers Caucus is working on its own measure, noting he believes it will result in a product that meets the speaker’s specifications. Curbelo believes that too, but believes both sides are slow-walking a solution, despite the desire by many members to get something done by the end of the year. “It’s a shame because there’s an overwhelming majority of members who want to get this done,” he said. “And unfortunately there’s a lot of waiting around and watching.” Rep. Raul Labrador, chairman of the House Judiciary immigration subcommittee, said he doesn’t believe any version of the DREAM Act/RAC Act would get support from a majority of Republicans. He said about 80 percent of the conference is on the side of more border security, less legalization and ultimately it will be up to leadership to decide what balance to pursue. The Idaho Republican is a member of Ryan’s task force but he said he could not talk about what the group is doing. https://www.rollcall.com/news/politi...rence-daca-fix I hate that Puerto Rican SOB so much . |
Re: Bipartisan Group Looks to Split Difference on DACA Fix
Thanks for posting everything you find about DACA/DA. You save my ass some time.
Keep the good work going. |
Re: Bipartisan Group Looks to Split Difference on DACA Fix
So very close to that christmas greencard. Hopefully this will be a year to remember.
|
Re: Bipartisan Group Looks to Split Difference on DACA Fix
There is really no shortage of bills already.
|
Re: Bipartisan Group Looks to Split Difference on DACA Fix
More stalling...
|
Re: Bipartisan Group Looks to Split Difference on DACA Fix
Quote:
|
Re: Bipartisan Group Looks to Split Difference on DACA Fix
Quote:
Also since when did bringing your loved ones to live in the country you now call home (ie: chain migration) become a terrible action? |
Re: Bipartisan Group Looks to Split Difference on DACA Fix
December to Remember
|
Re: Bipartisan Group Looks to Split Difference on DACA Fix
It seems like Curbelo is playing a MASSIVE HAND here. It's all up to that wuss Paul Ryan to bring anything up for a vote though. He has no guts that guy. But this is definitely very heartening. It seems to me this could push to 2018 though. Whatever the solution it has be a PERMANENT fix. No "extending DACA' bullshit.
|
Re: Bipartisan Group Looks to Split Difference on DACA Fix
this is good! atleast they can build a consensus on what should be included and excluded,
e.g. - age cap - aged out dreamers - current dacaers only - chain migration - end chain migration - 5-10 yr wait for citizenship - no citizenship and other provisions! |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.