![]() |
Paxton's back - "An order permanently enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewing"
Maybe an expedited shutting down of DACA is the last hope Congress will have to do something. Again, maybe.
Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court issue the following relief regarding the Final Rule: A. An order permanently enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewing any DACA permits in the future under the Final Rule; B. An order vacating the Final Rule as substantively unlawful and unconstitutional, and arbitrary and capricious under the APA; C. A declaratory judgment that the Final Rule is substantively unlawful under the APA; D. A declaratory judgment that the Final Rule violates the Take Care Clause; E. A declaratory judgment that the Final Rule is arbitrary and capricious; F. Any and all other relief to which Plaintiffs may be entitled. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov...0Complaint.pdf |
Re: Paxton's back - "An order permanently enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewi
Full news release from Paxton's website:
Quote:
|
Re: Paxton's back - "An order permanently enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewi
First of all, do we qualify for receive taxpayer-funded benefits such as Social Security and Medicare???
Second of all, there are 2 or 3 pending cases against Paxton, when are they going to get around to finally indicting him? Third, the judge will look at the basis for the request or the immediate need. Since daca has been around for 10 years, it's safe to say there is no need to immediately stop daca since no harm is being done. |
Re: Paxton's back - "An order permanently enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewi
no rest for the wicked.
|
Re: Paxton's back - "An order permanently enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewi
Quote:
|
Re: Paxton's back - "An order permanently enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewi
They want to give us a Christmas gift of love.
|
Re: Paxton's back - "An order permanently enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewi
The grinch. Deported by christmas. ��
|
Re: Paxton's back - "An order permanently enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewi
Quote:
There are over 20 totalization agreements currently in effect between the US and other countries, which allow individuals to more-or-less combine any accumulated social security credits acquired in either country. As of the Social Security Act of 2004, more specifically Section 211 of the SSPA, the primary requirement is a valid, work-permitting social security number associated with accumulated credits, which all DACA recipients were able to obtain through approval of I-765. However, the US government will not process the first payment until one either proves their legal status while present in the US, or leaves the United States and shows up at the consulate in the native country to complete the processing. |
Re: Paxton's back - "An order permanently enjoining Defendants from issuing or renewi
So ice gets its funding and immigrants that have built a life here get the after thought. Dems and Republicans are both full of shit.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.