Originally Posted by buckminsterfullerene

maybe I am a bit tired because I have not sleep well lately.... but .... subparagraph F is the one that has the age cap.... its not quoted above, could it be possible...

if that is right.... then according to 5(d)(1)(D), I am covered under the retroactive regardless of the lowering of the age cap... and technically if people have been here and gone through school on schedule, it could be lowered as much as 25 and without screwing up the chances for the people that would complete the college requirement ideally by around age 21 (18-19 graduate from high school 21 should complete at least 2 years of college). But here is the thing, our situation is such that there would be a lot of potential beneficiaries lost through no fault of their own because they have to take a limited number of credit hours to make their education affordable or postpone the education to make the money, or just avoid the education and start working to provide for their families.

I am still against lowering the age cap for those reasons, it would fault a lot of people for what I think its unreasonable.

I just can't believe I never noticed that the retroactive benefits exclude the age cap...