View Single Post
#14
05-07-2012, 10:45 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth
Quote:
Originally Posted by cacheton011 View Post
smooth a.k.a suave, I think NumbersMex will oppose it regardless....

I was brought here when I was 2 so I guess I would meet 99% of Rubio's requirements, or at least the "rumored" requirements. I hope Dems can agree that E-verify is necessary to keep Rubio's bill alive.

I was wondering though, if they implement the e-verify program nationwide, would employers be required to check the status of their current employees or just new ones?

Contestame
Well, I think E-verify is even a divisive issue in the House among the GOP because of commercial interests. I am sure many of us still remember the skepticism that Lamar Smith received from members of his own party over E-verify.

What we CAN and SHOULD do is to ask both sides to consider the inclusion of E-verify in their talks to see if something along the lines of relief+E-verify could be passed.

I think E-verify being implemented at the national level would even screw over those already working. Companies would not want to risk suffering the consequence, so I am certain that they would check the status of their current workers and aspirants.
Post your reply or quote more messages.