I see that word "hope" being thrown around a lot lately...and try to stay away from it. I stick with precedents as my reasoning.

I do strongly believe advance parole will remain for "Deferred Action". Deferred action and Advance Parole were around as administrative tools long before "DACA". I don't think the administration will change that.

The issue surrounds the aggressive posture of the incoming administration and will he honor re-entry with an AP document if you have "DACA". Most pro-immigrant non-profits warning about AP post-Trump mean specifically returning from travel with it. Customs and Border Patrol can be ordered to not to allow re-entry for DACA applicants.

However, I think a Trump Administration might want to be cautious about this. A legal challenge might come from Dreamers with approved AP and DACA and a little help(money and support) from pro-immigrant organizations.

The challenge and expected success could result in the 9th Circuit codifying a precedent such as Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly, but specifically for those who hold Deferred Action did not abandon such legal presence upon their return. This is ONLY IF DACA is held by the beneficiary, however.

Note: I expressly left out the BIA because of the potential influence of an Attorney General Sessions. Lol, for now specifics escape my grasp. I believe it is more worthwhile to focus more on how to reach the goal in question.