View Single Post
#21
02-08-2017, 09:16 AM
BANNED
Joined in Feb 2017
52 posts
Dreamer0987
I reached out to one of the lawyers of that blog post and asked him about point number 4. I asked where exactly did he the information for point number 4.

He replied:
Quote:
Sure, See Section 11(c),
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press...t-improvements


Got to read the details of these orders.
I went on that link and look for that specific section.

Section 11C says:

Quote:
(c) Pursuant to section 235(b)(1)(A)(iii)(I) of the INA, the Secretary shall take appropriate action to apply, in his sole and unreviewable discretion, the provisions of section 235(b)(1)(A)(i) and (ii) of the INA to the aliens designated under section 235(b)(1)(A)(iii)(II).
I searched the whole EO and couldn't find anything that says 2 years of evidence will help you or if it is even necessary.

Does anyone have any ideas?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AztecAztec View Post
@Dreamer0987 it is from the 1997 Immigration law concerning expedited removal. It is usually used for people in the country less than two weeks and within 100 miles of the border.

DHS ( I think ) can expand it to the entire country and up to two years without going through congress.

Expedited removal is done by a DHS office and the decision is final ( You can get it vacated ). There is no immigration judge or appeal. It is quick, cheap and easy for DHS compared to normal removal.

https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/...0-11261/0-0-0-36122/0-0-0-36228.html
@AztecAztec, so the two year evidence is based on the 1997 immigration law?
Post your reply or quote more messages.