Originally Posted by Laterlater

Jesus, this thread is beyond thick.

First, read the entire article, not just the bits OP has selectively choosen, to get a better sense of the anxiety of those you are to quick to disparage.

You may yet disagree with them, but at least they understand it comes from a place of good faith (in the argument).

Second, rather than being mindless reactionaries, endlessly whipping oneself up into paroxysms of outrage, mostly not even on the content or merits, but on the strength of the labels you yourself have ascribed to others, by which you then malign them (which is easier, I know), just answer the substance of their individual contention; talk to them, not at them.

In other words, see the people behind your opaque and gratuitous labels, and address them. Stop raving against your own caricatures of others.

Which in this case is very simple. Just point out, that insofar as their is any concern about 'mass deportation' or anything similar being coupled with DA legislation at present, this fear is absolutely unfounded on the facts, as their is not such legislation, drafted or otherwise. That is it.

All this inane name calling of "far-left, communist, feminist, regressive, libertard, etc" is a pointless distraction from the discussion at hand.


Like this species of genius


To which a natural reaction should be:
First, what the f--- are you talking about?
Second, what connection does it even have to DA?
Third, what the f--- are you talking about?