Originally Posted by bigdreamer2010

It could be true that sessions and the justice department left this backdoor open on purpose. That makes more sense than just incompetence given that the justice department has literally hundreds of lawyers AND DAPA was killed because it “violated the administrative procedure act”. It makes no sense that it happened by accident.

I’m not sure what Paxton is pulling starting a lawsuit 14 days before the case is heard at the 9th and according to Karen Tumlin whatever ruling comes out of Texas has no impact on the current injunctions. We all knew this would end up at the Supreme Court so what’s the point? Is he assuming that the Supreme Court will reject to hear the case, bounce it back to the 9th where the injunction will remain in place and renewals would continue to be processed? Or is he just an asshole? It could be either.

Also does it even matter what Bates rules? Wasn’t there another federal judge that ruled in favor of trump ending daca? That didn’t have any impact on the renewals either.

I’m just so confused