Someone find me the proper decision, I am tired of people regurgitating tweets and sucking republican dick.

Nevermind, I found it:
https://images.law.com/contrib/conte...3113980550.pdf


Well the decision is basically the same as the one from California. Process renewals, don't have to process initial applications, don't have to offer new Advance Parole.

Well the last one is kinda horse shit, AP would help quite a few people, including me.

From page 53:
For the foregoing reasons, the court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated that they are entitled to a preliminary injunction. Defendants are therefore ORDERED to maintain the DACA program on the same terms and conditions that existed prior to the promulgation of the DACA Rescission Memo, subject to the following limitations. Defendants need not consider new applications by individuals who have never before obtained DACA benefits; need not continue granting "advanced parole" to DACA beneficiaries; and, of course, may adjudicate DACA renewal requests on a case-by-case, individualized basis.