Quote:
Originally Posted by legendver2
Are they really conflicting injunctions though? The other rulings state it was illegal for Trump to end it the way he did, but this case states that the program was illegal since the beginning. Two totally different approaches, and it feels like Hanen's case would supersede those since it affects the programs conception from the start.
|
Someone also said that because circuit courts have ruled, they would supercede Hanens court. Not sure how Right that is. But we might have to look forward to