• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The Lounge

Are you an EWI or Overstay? - Page 3

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
View Poll Results: Are you an EWI or Overstay? Post a Poll
I am an EWI 18 32.73%
I am an overstay 37 67.27%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll

  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
#21
04-30-2012, 12:35 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
1,061 posts
Tacvbo's Avatar
Tacvbo
Tacvbo
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Tacvbo
Find all posts by Tacvbo
0 AP
And of course a lot of people in here are still gonna be shitbags lying to themselves and say they are overstays...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#22
04-30-2012, 12:58 AM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesp View Post
B1/B2 are usually issued for 10 years. But that doesn't mean that folks can come here and stay for 10 years. The maximum amount of time you can stay is 6 months. After 6 months your I-94 will expire and if you stay even a day after the I-94 expiration date, your presence is considered illegal even though your visa doesn't expire until 10 years later.

There is a formal application process to extend your I-94 expiration date. It is very difficult to get an approval because it'd show your intent to live the US permanently f0r 10 years.

Unless you originally came here on a J1 or F1 visa, your legal stay was for SIX months or less regardless of your visa validity date. I-94 expiration date comes first!
So what is the purpose of issuing a 10 year Visa if they can stay for just 6 months? You would be on overstay after 6 months or after 10 years?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#23
04-30-2012, 02:26 AM
Senior Member
From Texas
Joined in Mar 2012
432 posts
Kevin1is7lucky
Kevin1is7lucky
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Kevin1is7lucky
Find all posts by Kevin1is7lucky
0 AP
To iDream, and Aspire705:

First of all congratulations, I credit you both for changing my opinion. I read both of your posts thoroughly and ask for the same courtesy for I do not want to be misunderstood. My only reasons for using this forum is to encourage, inform, and/or learn from other dreamers. I try to refrain from arguing, but I'm only human and sometimes get carried away.

Well I'm not a trained magician, but here goes my attempt at pulling a rabbit out of a hat. I'll start by explaining my original post and what I was thinking and referring to. Both of you misunderstood me to an extent. I did not intend for you to think "all" overstayers should not benefit from the DREAM act, I was referring to a specific group. The specifc type of overstayer would be someone whose visa didn't expire until after they turned 18. My reasoning behind that was their visa would technically be a visitor's pass and they would know that means they have to go back. Knowing that and being 18 (an adult) and making the decision to stay would mean at the time of breaking immigration law they were an adult and would not qualify under the DREAM act. Now the only thing that I didn't think of, or more accurately I didn't realize was that if they were brought before age 15 (qualifying them for the DREAM act) they would have made this their home. Thank you for making me realize that.

I understand that in my original post I may have come off as ignorant. Actually that was my underlying intention because as an EWI I have no idea what an overstayer's perspective is, or how they think about our somewhat different situations. I also said you can "change my mind" and "I don't mean to offend" because I truly wanted to be informed, and maybe I didn't know how to ask. I'm sorry for that.

Many of yall's arguments arose from the idea that I didn't think overstayers should benefit from the DREAM act, but like I said that was not at all what I meant.

Now that I know why yall would not leave as overstayers, I'll defend my reason for staying and qualifying under the DREAM act. Hopefully this applies to fellow EWIs. I was "sneaked" through the border as a young child I have a very vague memory, basically no memory of the event. I was raised by my parents, by my teachers, by my new friends, by my American television set, and by the odd-number of brief encounters with people here. It is wrong for me to say that this became my home because I don't recall ever having a home other than this place. I am essentially American in every way, but my birthplace. You said that I should sneak back across to right my wrong. I wouldn't even know how or where to do that. And most importantly I don't recall doing anything wrong. Doing what my parents said was not wrong at that age. So what I'm trying to say is this is my home and now that I am an adult the only "wrong" thing that I could possibly do is leave my home. And to be completely honest I didn't know about the 10 year ban until I was 19, I'm still 19. So going back has never even been a plan B.

So thank you for informing me, and I really appreciate both of your posts sorry that I aroused so much disgust on both of your parts. I think if you don't post on here often you definitely should because your opinion is very valuable especially to me.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#24
04-30-2012, 03:09 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2010
1,256 posts
iDream
iDream
View Public Profile
Send a private message to iDream
Find all posts by iDream
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin1is7lucky View Post
I don't mean to sound harsh, but some people are overstayers and they arrived before 15, but their visa didn't expire until after they were 18 and are now overstayers. To me they were adults an had the ability to make the decision of leaving, or adjusting. And should not benefit from the DREAM act. Like I said it's harsh thought, and I don't mean to offend anyone, but as an EWI when I was 6 I truly had no choice on whether to stay or go, and this became my home. Well if any of yall want to change my opinion go right ahead.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin1is7lucky View Post
To iDream, and Aspire705:

Both of you misunderstood me to an extent. I did not intend for you to think "all" overstayers should not benefit from the DREAM act, I was referring to a specific group. The specifc type of overstayer would be someone whose visa didn't expire until after they turned 18. My reasoning behind that was their visa would technically be a visitor's pass and they would know that means they have to go back. Knowing that and being 18 (an adult) and making the decision to stay would mean at the time of breaking immigration law they were an adult and would not qualify under the DREAM act.
It doesn't really matter how much you explain yourself. For me, for a person to have their opinion based on disqualifying a group of fellow undocumented immigrants from having a better life IS Ignorant. Whether its for EWI's or Overstays. With that perspective, you're no different from these politicians who plays with our lives for their own selfish benefits. People who categorized us as criminals and a burden for this country. So don't separate yourself from the overstayers and think that you deserve better. because no matter how you paint a rock it's still a damn rock. EWI's and Overstay's are both undocumented and we're all suffering and fighting the same battle. We All deserve the right to be here and we all deserve to live out our American dream.
Last edited by iDream; 04-30-2012 at 03:12 AM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#25
04-30-2012, 04:34 AM
Senior Member
From California
Joined in Jan 2009
1,438 posts
Dreamer X's Avatar
Dreamer X
Dreamer X
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dreamer X
Find all posts by Dreamer X
0 AP
if i was an EWI I'd leave, go back to my country of origin and go through proper channels. Just sayin..
__________________
"I shall seize Fate by the throat; it shall certainly not bend and crush me completely" -Ludwig von Beethoven
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#26
04-30-2012, 07:34 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2010
359 posts
Dazany4002's Avatar
Dazany4002
Dazany4002
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dazany4002
Find all posts by Dazany4002
0 AP
That's because if all EWI's were overstays, they'd all be married to USC's, and if all overstays were EWI's, they'd all go back to their country of origin and go through proper channels.
__________________
Application received: 11/07/2012 (California Center)
Biometrics completed: 12/10/2012
EAD / DACA Approved: 03/21/2013, 08/31/2015
Driver's License: 05/14/2013
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#27
04-30-2012, 09:34 AM
Junior Member
Joined in Mar 2008
22 posts
Aspire705
Aspire705
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Aspire705
Find all posts by Aspire705
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamer X View Post
if i was an EWI I'd leave, go back to my country of origin and go through proper channels. Just sayin..
Exactly!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazany4002 View Post
That's because if all EWI's were overstays, they'd all be married to USC's, and if all overstays were EWI's, they'd all go back to their country of origin and go through proper channels.
This^ too! See what I did there Kevin1is7lucky? The point is that both groups see the other as being better off than they are, when in actuality, neither side is better off.
We're both a part of a sh***y situation that neither of us had a hand in making, & to disqualify one group from relief while granting it to the other is just flat out unjust & plain wrong. Do you see what I'm saying or do u disagree?
I'll respond to the rest of your other post later, but I think this accurately sums up my take on the matter. So whether we agree or disagree can be determined from this post and your response to it.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#28
04-30-2012, 10:30 AM
Senior Member
From Texas
Joined in Mar 2012
432 posts
Kevin1is7lucky
Kevin1is7lucky
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Kevin1is7lucky
Find all posts by Kevin1is7lucky
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by iDream View Post
It doesn't really matter how much you explain yourself. For me, for a person to have their opinion based on disqualifying a group of fellow undocumented immigrants from having a better life IS Ignorant. Whether its for EWI's or Overstays. With that perspective, you're no different from these politicians who plays with our lives for their own selfish benefits. People who categorized us as criminals and a burden for this country. So don't separate yourself from the overstayers and think that you deserve better. because no matter how you paint a rock it's still a damn rock. EWI's and Overstay's are both undocumented and we're all suffering and fighting the same battle. We All deserve the right to be here and we all deserve to live out our American dream.
You completely disregarded the parts of my response where I demonstrated that my opinion had changed... Doesn't that make you ignorant? The reason I even had that opinion was because I thought of them as being adults during the time of their unlawful presence, disqualifying them for the DREAM act. Again keyword there is HAD. The whole point of the DREAM act is to help those who were kids when they were brought here illegally. I felt that if they were adults when they became undocumented then they weren't exactly brought here illegally. Do you understand that? And again let me make the point that I no longer hold that sentiment for reason I have already entailed in my previous response. And never did I mention I was better than overstayers, or even compare them in my original post. All I did was state an opinion/observation so that it may be discussed.

Now I ask you to stop harassing me. I'm not trying to take anything away from anyone, nor do I have the power to do any such thing. I will again make the point that I DO NOT HAVE ANYTHING AGAINST OVERSTAYERS. I never separated myself from the overstayers YOU did that with your rhetoric. Now with that said, I do not personally care what you think of my opinion in future debates or threads, but do not portray me in such falsehood to others.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#29
04-30-2012, 10:43 AM
Senior Member
From Texas
Joined in Mar 2012
432 posts
Kevin1is7lucky
Kevin1is7lucky
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Kevin1is7lucky
Find all posts by Kevin1is7lucky
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aspire705 View Post
Exactly!

This^ too! See what I did there Kevin1is7lucky? The point is that both groups see the other as being better off than they are, when in actuality, neither side is better off.
We're both a part of a sh***y situation that neither of us had a hand in making, & to disqualify one group from relief while granting it to the other is just flat out unjust & plain wrong. Do you see what I'm saying or do u disagree?
I'll respond to the rest of your other post later, but I think this accurately sums up my take on the matter. So whether we agree or disagree can be determined from this post and your response to it.
Okay so from this I get you haven't read my response. And I agree with you neither of the groups is better off, in fact to prove if anyone is better off than someone else you would have to take it on a case by case basis. But our individual struggle is entirely the same. That has always been my view. And like I said before I wasn't trying to take anything from overstayers, and my observation wasn't of overstayers as a whole, but merely a very specific case. And to make it absolutely clear I no longer hold that opinion of that fraction of overstayers.

And to add a personal touch I do not want to be married, geez I'm only 19. So I don't think you have that over me. To me getting married JUST to get citizenship is cheating the system. I'm not about cheating, or taking advantage of anything. And if you have an analytical mind it will be a self- evident truth when you take into account my original post.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#30
04-30-2012, 10:59 AM
Senior Member
From Texas
Joined in Mar 2012
432 posts
Kevin1is7lucky
Kevin1is7lucky
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Kevin1is7lucky
Find all posts by Kevin1is7lucky
0 AP
And here is another observation I would like to discuss... So one of the Republican problems with the DREAM act is that it encourages illegal immigration, which in reality it doesn't. Although prolonging the DREAM act does because if an immigrant comes now and brings their kids in 5 years their kids will be eligible for the DREAM act. Do you see how it is counter intuitive for Republicans? And encourages illegal immigration?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.