• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The Lounge

Im think I figured it out - Page 2

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
Closed Thread
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
#11
09-22-2012, 06:34 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
569 posts
Lulu_derek1
Lulu_derek1
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Lulu_derek1
Find all posts by Lulu_derek1
0 AP
Oh ok I got I'm sorry u were just being sarcastic l! It's kool I don't think u cheated the system and walk in front of the line they're just mad for some reason! It's funny cus legal immigrants that come legally from their countries are saying the same shit about us Dreamers!
__________________
California service center Application sent: 09/07/2012Arrival date:Acceptance letter: 09/15/2012
Biometrics completed: 10/12/2012 Riverside
APPROVED:11/06/2012 Applied for SSN:11/13/2012
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#12
09-22-2012, 06:35 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2012
628 posts
ItsKdC
ItsKdC
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ItsKdC
Find all posts by ItsKdC
0 AP
To be fair no thread like this has been started. There has been posts with this speculation, but not an entire thread.

Now as pointless as this thread is, and as useless as i believe the info provided is (its just a guess by him) i will play my usual role as the devil's advocate of these forums. If u think about it carefully, USCIS made their timetable and divided their workforce. Now if they expected to have X number of biometrics completed weekly, they would expect to have to go through X number of cases per week. However with the the flood of walk ins they have been having, they now have X(y) number of biometrics done that for week 1's schedule which was only expecting X number of biometrics.

Put it this way...lets day 50% of the scheduled appointments are being done early via walk ins that would drastically slow down the system. Maybe a math wiz can come in here and make a nice formula for me...i used to be a math wiz, but have been outta school for quite some time. I digress...

Week 1. They expect 100 biometrics results so they divide their workforce to tackle 100 packets. However, because 50% of the individuals scheduled for week 2 decided to do a walk in now they have 150 cases to review instead of 100 for week 1. Now remember they ONLY have the resources to tackle 100 applications.

Week 2. Now they have the 50 remaining from week one, plus the 50 that waited for their appointment in week 2, and at this point word begins to spread that walk ins may speed up ur application (perhaps even to the detriment of the person in front of u). Now u have perhaps an even greater percentage of individuals doing walk ins (say 70%). I dont know how accurate my math is, but u can clearly see how an influx can mess up the schedule and slow down the process.

Now this is just a guess, and i really dont think that's the case. However it's not a statement i can completely shun, because there is some common sense to it and it can hold up if u think about it logically.
__________________
Date Sent - 8/22/2012 (McDonough, GA).......Lockbox Facility - Chicago, IL.
Delivery Date - 8/24/2012 @ 12:32 pm.........G-1145 Alert - 8/29/2012 @ 6:15 pm
I-797C Received - 9/4/2012.........................Biometrics - Received 9-14-2012, For/Done 10-1-2012
RFE/Approval - (11/27/2012)/(1/15/2013)..EAD/SSN/DL - (1/19/2013)/(1/26/2013)/(1/29/2013)
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#13
09-22-2012, 06:38 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2012
196 posts
dmdreaming
dmdreaming
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dmdreaming
Find all posts by dmdreaming
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr3america View Post
I am in no way dogging on all my fellow DREAMers who did a walk-in, BUT im starting to think that because all those walk-ins, they clogged up the system and overloaded it.
They gave us all appointments for a reason. They had it all planned out, to keep the system running smooth and fast. This is just my POV on it. What do yall guys think?

Whatever, I completely agree. But I also don't blame the people who did walk-ins. If the center near me allowed walk-ins I would probably do one. But they don't, so I'll wait patiently...
__________________
EAD approved: 12-02-2012.
Renewal sent: 8-4-2014.
Notification received: 8-7-2014. Routed to Nebraska.
Biometrics letter received: 8-22-2014 for 9-5-2014.
New approval: 10-31-2014.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#14
09-22-2012, 06:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
569 posts
Lulu_derek1
Lulu_derek1
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Lulu_derek1
Find all posts by Lulu_derek1
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by NotAPro View Post
If that is all you took out of that no GOLD STAR for you.

I was just making a stupid statement like the OP.
Oh ok I got I'm sorry u were just being sarcastic l! It's kool I don't think u cheated the system and walk in front of the line they're just mad for some reason! It's funny cus legal immigrants that come legally from their countries are saying the same shit about us Dreamers!
__________________
California service center Application sent: 09/07/2012Arrival date:Acceptance letter: 09/15/2012
Biometrics completed: 10/12/2012 Riverside
APPROVED:11/06/2012 Applied for SSN:11/13/2012
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#15
09-22-2012, 06:45 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Oct 2011
310 posts
Chey00's Avatar
Chey00
Chey00
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Chey00
Find all posts by Chey00
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsKdC View Post
To be fair no thread like this has been started. There has been posts with this speculation, but not an entire thread.

Now as pointless as this thread is, and as useless as i believe the info provided is (its just a guess by him) i will play my usual role as the devil's advocate of these forums. If u think about it carefully, USCIS made their timetable and divided their workforce. Now if they expected to have X number of biometrics completed weekly, they would expect to have to go through X number of cases per week. However with the the flood of walk ins they have been having, they now have X(y) number of biometrics done that for week 1's schedule which was only expecting X number of biometrics.

Put it this way...lets day 50% of the scheduled appointments are being done early via walk ins that would drastically slow down the system. Maybe a math wiz can come in here and make a nice formula for me...i used to be a math wiz, but have been outta school for quite some time. I digress...

Week 1. They expect 100 biometrics results so they divide their workforce to tackle 100 packets. However, because 50% of the individuals scheduled for week 2 decided to do a walk in now they have 150 cases to review instead of 100 for week 1. Now remember they ONLY have the resources to tackle 100 applications.

Week 2. Now they have the 50 remaining from week one, plus the 50 that waited for their appointment in week 2, and at this point word begins to spread that walk ins may speed up ur application (perhaps even to the detriment of the person in front of u). Now u have perhaps an even greater percentage of individuals doing walk ins (say 70%). I dont know how accurate my math is, but u can clearly see how an influx can mess up the schedule and slow down the process.

Now this is just a guess, and i really dont think that's the case. However it's not a statement i can completely shun, because there is some common sense to it and it can hold up if u think about it logically.
^ I can see your point. And to add to it, say a person that is actually waiting for his scheduled date has an appointment at the end of the day around 3pm or something, and then all these walk ins happen before his scheduled time, so obviously those earlier walk-ins will have their results sent earlier than the person scheduled At the end of the day and therefore delay that persons approval response. I suppose this is why people who are patiently waiting for their appointments are getting mad. But just like you said, we don't know for sure. It's just an assumption.
__________________
Application Status: Self-filed on 8/18/12 to Chicago w/ Priority Mail and Delivered on 8/20/12 @ 2:47pm
Date of G-1145 Notification Received (email & text): 08/27/12 @ 3:48pm Routed to Vermont
Date of I-797C Notice of Action Letter Received: 08/31/12
Date of Biometrics: Received 08/31/12 and Scheduled for 09/17/12 in Cranston, RI.
Date of Approval: 10/23/12
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#16
09-22-2012, 06:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
302 posts
goobie_pls
goobie_pls
View Public Profile
Send a private message to goobie_pls
Find all posts by goobie_pls
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by ItsKdC View Post
To be fair no thread like this has been started. There has been posts with this speculation, but not an entire thread.

Now as pointless as this thread is, and as useless as i believe the info provided is (its just a guess by him) i will play my usual role as the devil's advocate of these forums. If u think about it carefully, USCIS made their timetable and divided their workforce. Now if they expected to have X number of biometrics completed weekly, they would expect to have to go through X number of cases per week. However with the the flood of walk ins they have been having, they now have X(y) number of biometrics done that for week 1's schedule which was only expecting X number of biometrics.

Put it this way...lets day 50% of the scheduled appointments are being done early via walk ins that would drastically slow down the system. Maybe a math wiz can come in here and make a nice formula for me...i used to be a math wiz, but have been outta school for quite some time. I digress...

Week 1. They expect 100 biometrics results so they divide their workforce to tackle 100 packets. However, because 50% of the individuals scheduled for week 2 decided to do a walk in now they have 150 cases to review instead of 100 for week 1. Now remember they ONLY have the resources to tackle 100 applications.

Week 2. Now they have the 50 remaining from week one, plus the 50 that waited for their appointment in week 2, and at this point word begins to spread that walk ins may speed up ur application (perhaps even to the detriment of the person in front of u). Now u have perhaps an even greater percentage of individuals doing walk ins (say 70%). I dont know how accurate my math is, but u can clearly see how an influx can mess up the schedule and slow down the process.

Now this is just a guess, and i really dont think that's the case. However it's not a statement i can completely shun, because there is some common sense to it and it can hold up if u think about it logically.
There's no slowing down because the inflow of packets never stops, packets are assigned priority, and certain forms have to be adjudicated within a fixed time frame. Having your packet reviewed earlier because you walked in is a completely different issue--you are taking other people's spots, which I am OK with if it's permitted (I don't give a fuck, etc). USCIS guarantees to adjudicate your case within a certain time because they have done the projections and have the sufficient task force to do so--that's why they hired extra employees, so that DACA beneficiaries could have their EADs within 4-6 months.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#17
09-22-2012, 06:49 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
1,882 posts
NotAPro's Avatar
NotAPro
NotAPro
View Public Profile
Send a private message to NotAPro
Find all posts by NotAPro
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chey00 View Post
^ I can see your point. And to add to it, say a person that is actually waiting for his scheduled date has an appointment for the end of the day around 3pm or something, and then all these walk ins happen before his scheduled time, so obviously those earlier walk-ins will have their results sent earlier than the person scheduled At the end of the day and therefore delay that persons approval response. I suppose this is why people who are patiently waiting for their appointments are getting mad. But just like you said, we don't know for sure. It's just an assumption.
I would, agree with anyone and anything, if we had proof of these statements.

WE DON'T KNOW!!! That's the only fact.

For the previous statement that I'm home free not exactly, I applied along with two other people and their cases have not been approved, I helped them with their forms, and I feel responsible for that, so I am not home free until I get resolution from that. THE END.
__________________
2012 Case: Approved. 9/11
2014 Renewal: Approved. 9/02
2016 Renewal: Approved. 9/01

'I do not believe in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.'
-Thomas Carlyle
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#18
09-22-2012, 06:55 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
302 posts
goobie_pls
goobie_pls
View Public Profile
Send a private message to goobie_pls
Find all posts by goobie_pls
0 AP
Let's put an end to this shit. If you submit your case, you'll have your case approved or denied within the time period that USCIS specified. If someone cuts in line and gets their shit earlier while you had the very same opportunity then you deserve to wait. I'd make Charles Darwin proud, bitches don't know about my alphaness.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#19
09-22-2012, 06:57 PM
Senior Member
From SoCal
Joined in Aug 2012
5,123 posts
g33k
g33k
View Public Profile
Send a private message to g33k
Find all posts by g33k
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr3america View Post
At first I didnt care, but now I do bc other people cut in front of others and slowed the process down.
Walking-in is not cutting. There are severable people who turned in their application early who are getting bio appointments even later than those who turned their stuff after. This is because appointments are giving on basis of workload of ASCs. Think a bit son....
__________________


"Throw yourself off a cliff and build your wings on the way down." -Ray Bradbury
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#20
09-22-2012, 06:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2012
628 posts
ItsKdC
ItsKdC
View Public Profile
Send a private message to ItsKdC
Find all posts by ItsKdC
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chey00 View Post
^ I can see your point. And to add to it, say a person that is actually waiting for his scheduled date has an appointment at the end of the day around 3pm or something, and then all these walk ins happen before his scheduled time, so obviously those earlier walk-ins will have their results sent earlier than the person scheduled At the end of the day and therefore delay that persons approval response. I suppose this is why people who are patiently waiting for their appointments are getting mad. But just like you said, we don't know for sure. It's just an assumption.
At first i thought u were being a douche. Lol

At the end of the day if u qualify then u qualify and that's that. Also the people who already have their appointments scheduled wont be affected. This may delay those without an appointment however (assuming there is any kind of a setback happening).
__________________
Date Sent - 8/22/2012 (McDonough, GA).......Lockbox Facility - Chicago, IL.
Delivery Date - 8/24/2012 @ 12:32 pm.........G-1145 Alert - 8/29/2012 @ 6:15 pm
I-797C Received - 9/4/2012.........................Biometrics - Received 9-14-2012, For/Done 10-1-2012
RFE/Approval - (11/27/2012)/(1/15/2013)..EAD/SSN/DL - (1/19/2013)/(1/26/2013)/(1/29/2013)
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
Closed Thread


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.