• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The Lounge

Reid must let Republicans add admendments to the Dream Act. - Page 3

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
    Thread Tools
    Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
    Email this Page Email this Page
Closed Thread
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • next ›
  • last »
#21
11-19-2010, 08:46 PM
Member
From orlando
Joined in Nov 2010
46 posts
sexy
sexy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to sexy
Find all posts by sexy
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDim View Post
I'm not saying he should do anything.
am sorry i write the wrong person . i was talking to some one eles sorry
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#22
11-19-2010, 08:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2007
1,190 posts
K-Man's Avatar
K-Man
K-Man
View Public Profile
Send a private message to K-Man
Find all posts by K-Man
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DreamerSD23 View Post
A lot of Senate Republicans are voting against the DA because it is too broad, if Reid allows them to add admendments there is a bigger chance of it passing. Remember, we only have 53 sure votes from Reid's Democrats.

1. Let them lower the age from 35 to 25-26. I know I'm selfish because I'm only 17, but if DA does not pass now it may never come up again for years with Republicans controlling the House and Obama having a 90% of not being re-elected in 2012.

2. Change conditional green card to student visas with work permit, or any combination. "Legal" status is MUCH better than being undocumented. There are a lot of avenues one can use to get permanent resident status if one is on a legal status.

Partial Dream Act > no Dream Act at all.
Nice try on the thread title, but some of us didn't fight for 10 years so you can get a student visa past your jr high years. I have a BA degree and I can just easily say that; we should allow amendments that rule out 17 year olds whos balls haven't dropped, based on the grounds that you don't respect your seniors who's fought for your freedom for a decade.

Why not right? I'm already contributing more in taxes than your chemistry homework.

The only forum section you belong is here: http://dreamact.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=29, and here http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=17657.

Ok thanks.
__________________

Bio Date - 02/22/18 (walked in 2/15)
Expiration - September '18
Approved - 04/09/18

Naturalized via MAVNI | April 2018
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#23
11-19-2010, 08:47 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2010
1,064 posts
eddy
eddy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to eddy
Find all posts by eddy
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Naty_1995 View Post
If you have a student visa, well then at least you have a path set for receiving residency eventually
...You don't know what you're talking about do you...
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#24
11-19-2010, 08:47 PM
Member
From Glen Burnie, MD
Joined in Apr 2009
51 posts
Naty_1995
Naty_1995
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Naty_1995
Find all posts by Naty_1995
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamberry View Post
If I were Sen. Reid I would not compromise for shit. DREAM alone is a compromise. smh at you people wanting to lower the age limit to exclude those who are the true fighters of the bill.
Like i've been saying we could lower it to a borderline, to include the original dreamers. And i would like to say just because they were fighting for it first does not mean they are anymore "true-er" than any other dreamer fighting for their chance to stay here. We are all equally dependent on the DREAM
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#25
11-19-2010, 08:48 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
1,172 posts
DreamerSD23
DreamerSD23
View Public Profile
Send a private message to DreamerSD23
Find all posts by DreamerSD23
0 AP
How can I say this any clearer, if we don't compromise,

EVERYONE will be left behind.

Republicans have no incentive to pass DA in its current form.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#26
11-19-2010, 08:51 PM
Member
From Glen Burnie, MD
Joined in Apr 2009
51 posts
Naty_1995
Naty_1995
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Naty_1995
Find all posts by Naty_1995
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DreamerSD23 View Post
How can I say this any clearer, if we don't compromise,

EVERYONE will be left behind.

Republicans have no incentive to pass DA in its current form.
I think you have a point. I would graciously give up my chance to be eligible for the DA IF countless others would then have a higher chance at it passing. I believe it is better to save a portion then to not save anyone.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#27
11-19-2010, 08:53 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2010
343 posts
dreamberry's Avatar
dreamberry
dreamberry
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamberry
Find all posts by dreamberry
210 AP
Add more border security measures? The side supporting us has already agreed to more deportations and border security. We've done our part. If they want border security at its finest, then have THEM compromise. DREAM is a compromise on its own. We've been compromising for years and there's no guarantee that once we amend the current version of the bill, that those crackhead republicans will even vote for it. They've done this again, and again.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#28
11-19-2010, 08:53 PM
Member
From orlando
Joined in Nov 2010
46 posts
sexy
sexy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to sexy
Find all posts by sexy
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Naty_1995 View Post
I think you have a point. I would graciously give up my chance to be eligible for the DA IF countless others would then have a higher chance at it passing. I believe it is better to save a portion then to not save anyone.
thats what you say now.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#29
11-19-2010, 08:54 PM
Senior Member
From Brooklyn NY
Joined in Feb 2009
676 posts
Alex's Avatar
Alex
Alex
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Alex
Find all posts by Alex
0 AP
as the current version stands.. No person shall make any private appeals or take private avenues if dream is enacted. Meaning' you wont be able to get sponsored or w/e if DA is what u applied for. u chose that legalization path; you stick with it.

by getting a student visa, u wont be able to seek any other avenues to become legal, u finish your studies and u pack up.

No compromise, u want compromise? through in a border security bill and sum e-verify crap, BUT do not try and compromise on other people's back; thats wrong, those who are 35 and came here before 16 shure as hell deserve it even more.

lets not step on eachother.
__________________
IUF
Post your reply or quote more messages.
#30
11-19-2010, 08:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
783 posts
victor85
victor85
View Public Profile
Send a private message to victor85
Find all posts by victor85
280 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Man View Post
Nice try on the thread title, but some of us didn't fight for 10 years so you can get a student visa past your jr high years. I have a BA degree and I can just easily say that; we should allow amendments that rule out 17 year olds whos balls haven't dropped, based on the grounds that you don't respect your seniors who's fought for your freedom for a decade.

Why not right? I'm already contributing more in taxes than your chemistry homework.

The only forum section you belong is here: http://dreamact.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=29, and here http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=17657.

Ok thanks.
Chill !!! If you already possess a 2 year degree and arrive in US before 16, you will automatically qualify for Dream Act even if you could 40.

This benefit derives from the retroactive provision in the Dream Act. The retroactive provision has no age limit.
Post your reply or quote more messages.
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • next ›
  • last »
Closed Thread


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.