• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

September

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Judge Hanen Sets DACA Hearing - Page 5

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
#41
06-02-2023, 06:38 AM
Moderator
Joined in Mar 2006
6,425 posts
Swim19's Avatar
Swim19
190 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by ceaguila View Post
So what the heck happened at the hearing?

There's almost no news or reports at all
Found this summary at the Hill:

Quote:
“Every aspect of this program is … unlawful,” said Ryan Walters, with the Texas Attorney General’s Office, which is representing the states that filed the lawsuit. The states have also argued that the White House overstepped its authority by granting immigration benefits that are for Congress to decide.

The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.

Lawyers for the U.S. Justice Department, DACA recipients and the state of New Jersey argued during the hearing the states have failed to present any evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred because of illegal immigration have been tied to DACA recipients.

They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Quote:
Lawyers for the states asked that the entire program be shut down within a four-year period after a final ruling.
Quote:
Texas and the other states filed their lawsuit because they disagree with immigration policy and not because of concerns over the implementation of laws, said Nina Perales, with the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, who spoke before Hanen on behalf of DACA recipients.
https://thehill.com/homenews/ap/ap-u...ed-against-it/
__________________
Initial Approval: 11/13/12
1st Renewal: 10-7-14
2nd Renewal: 10/12/16
3rd Renewal: 5/16/2018
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Swim19
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Swim19
Find all posts by Swim19
#42
06-02-2023, 01:06 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2018
1,058 posts
hDreamer1988 online
0 AP
The states trying to end daca do not calculate how much Daca recipients pay into these health care, education, and other costs with our taxes and the amount of economic activity we generate. Their hundreds of millions of dollars figure is undoubtedly inflated due to other immigration groups being lumped with daca. I wish a judge would order a breakdown of the total costs and for the states to prove their financial claims with an overall net dollar figure.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
hDreamer1988
View Public Profile
Send a private message to hDreamer1988
Find all posts by hDreamer1988
  • ‹ previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.