Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

A large number of the 2.1 million undocumented immigrants in this country who meet the age, duration of U.S. residency, and arrival age that would make them eligible for conditional legalization under a bill pending in Congress are not likely to attain legal status if the bill is enacted, says a study released this month by the Washington-based Migration Policy Institute.

The bill—called the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors, or DREAM, Act—says that undocumented youths who meet certain criteria and attend college or serve in the military for at least two years would be put on the path to legalization. The bill was first introduced in Congress in 2001, but has never made it any further than being approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee. The DREAM Act was last introduced in 2009.

Many of the undocumented immigrants who it seems could be beneficiaries of the DREAM Act don't have a high school education and have such limited English that it would be hard for them to be admitted to college or join the military, the researchers in the study conclude. One of the criteria for getting conditional legalization is having graduated from a U.S. high school. The researchers estimate that only about 825,000, or 38 percent, of the 2.1 million potential beneficiaries would eventually attain legal status. (The Pew Hispanic Center estimates that in 2008, the most recent year for which data is available, the nation had 11.9 million undocumented immigrants.)

A staff member for U.S. Sen. Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill., who has been the chief sponsor of the bill, told me in an e-mail that proponents will continue to try to get the bill passed as a stand-alone piece of legislation. He added that it's most likely to be taken up as part of comprehensive immigration reform. Sen. Durbin told the Associated Press this week that it's "very unlikely" Congress would pass the DREAM Act before the fall elections.

Student activists who want to see the DREAM Act enacted started this week to hold a "DREAM University teach-in" in the nation's capital to raise awareness about the bill. The Associated Press reported yesterday that they set up a make-shift school in Lafayette Park across from the White House where local professors gave free classes.

In a July 1 speech at American University asking Congress to back comprehensive immigration reform, President Obama restated his support for the DREAM Act. He did not set a timetable for immigration reform to be addressed by Congress.


http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/learn...likely_to.html

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

:(..........

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

I say let's take what we can get and be happy with that for now. I'm not one for settling, but anything we get right now is win for us.

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

this is good news! why sad faces!

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

i hope congress sees the push next week @ mobilization :D

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

dream act + enforcement

lets go!!!

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

lets just say the DREAM march is a huge success next week; that being said, i still dont think its possible for congress to pass DREAM in the two weeks left before august recess. its just not enought time..reppublicans are such a pain in the ass.

correct me if im wrong..please..

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

MOD EDIT: Please use respectful language.


MOD EDIT durbin, don't press for stand alone, squish that bill in every crack in any germane bill (defence, big spending, education).

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

I agree with the article.

Like Plz says, let's take what we can get because time is running out...

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

38% of 2.1 million is still a lot. Plus, I doubt the accuracy of this statistic so I would like to see how they came up with the number.

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

The intent behind this is obvious. It is just the CIR folks trying to deep-six DREAM. It is very tired and sad because you would think they would advocate any measure that offers anybody here illegally the chance to get legal.

As far as the other parts of this study about people who don't speak English well enough, or don't get a high-school degree, that is about like complaining that the DREAM act can't legalize people who came here after they were age 16, and adults that came here to work in the fields, etc. It will work very well for its intended purpose of legalizing people that can contribute to American society and are willing to do that by going to college or being in the military. The requirements are not that difficult to meet besides. What they are really complaining about is that this is not a CIR bill or mass amnesty.

These people can only hurt our cause, and they have been doing this since 2006.

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

This Is So Frustrating. Just Pass The Damn Thing Already. I'm So Fed Up With This Lifestyle.

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

ic we are missing a BS flag emoticon.....Nick, get on it!

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

If the Dream Act is about giving a chance to those who want one, then there is no excuse for those who can't even graduate from a community college with an English major degree which isn't hard to get.

It's not like the Dream Act is asking illegal minors to get advanced STEM degrees, so what's the excuse? An advanced STEM degree is what it would require a legal foreign student to get his/her green card under the CIR proposal.

Yes, I would get my green card either way, with Dream Act or a advanced STEM degree green card proposal, but the Dream Act version is no more difficult than graduating from a high school.

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

I really wish that Hatch would take the driver's seat on this issue, why?
- He is against CIR, so he won't push for it and won't feed BS that "Dream is a core component of CIR).
- He has to guts to go against his party's leadership (in 2003 he managed to squish Dream into a budget bill (sucks the bill ultimately failed).
- Has the republican can do attitude, not the democratic tip-topping around.

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

Callins next week :D, no emails they don't make a difference

Re: Study: DREAM Act Isn't Likely to Benefit Many
 

so true immigrant. somewhat saw the study. not a fan of it since it claims that those 35 and older would benefit if they have a college degree. that isn't true. it is really more for people like "immigrant" that already have their two years. so if that got that obvious thing wrong, what else do they have wrong?

so over a million people would get deported. for six years they would be able to drive, work, and have a normal life. they might even start a relationship that may end up in marriage/green card. and yes, we are saying we are the best of the best. if we can't cut it, then we don't.

is like with CIR. at the end of the day 5k dollars isn't much. but you try to have a fine of 2k and people are screaming bloody hell. any test they will have to take won't be difficult, but some will be screaming bloody hell and they will also look to get free/low cost class/legal help from the feds.