DREAM Act Portal Forum

DREAM Act Portal Forum (http://dreamact.info/forum/index.php)
-   The News Room (http://dreamact.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   House passes 2 immigration bills before recess. (http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=23764)

drock226 08-08-2011 04:36 PM

House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
House Passes Two Immigration Bills before Recess

Monday, the U.S. House of Representatives passed two immigration bills: H.R. 398 and H.R. 1933. (See Roll Call Votes 684 and 685) The first bill, H.R. 398, is sponsored by Immigration Subcommittee ranking chair Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA). H.R. 398 would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to toll (stop from running) the 90-day period in which an alien and petitioning spouse must file a petition and complete an interview to remove the alien’s conditional legal permanent resident status while either the alien or petitioning spouse is a member of the U.S. military serving abroad. (H.R. 398 at § 1(a)) Under current law, when a legal resident marries a foreign national, the alien spouse is granted lawful permanent residence on a conditional basis for the first two years they are in the country. (INA § 216(a)(1)) The Attorney General removes this conditional status only after he makes a favorable determination that the marriage between the alien spouse and petitioner is legitimate. (INA § 216(c))

The second bill, H.R. 1933, is sponsored by Judiciary Chair Lamar Smith (R-TX). H.R. 1933 would reinstate an expired program that admits nonimmigrant nurses to work in “health professional shortage areas.” The expired program, which terminated in 2009, provided for 500 nonimmigrant visas each fiscal year to aliens who obtained a nursing license, passed the requisite exam, and were otherwise eligible. (See the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999, Public Law 106-95) Each alien was granted an admission period of three years under the prior Act. Similarly, H.R. 1933 would allow the government to issue 300 visas to eligible foreign nurses each year for the next three years. (H.R. 1933 at §§ 1(a)-(b)) At the end of this initial period, admitted nurses can extend their stay for an additional three-years. (Id. at § 1(a)) Under the bill, visa recipients may also accept new employment as a nurse upon the successful petition of a new hospital employer. (Id. at § 1(c))

Both bills have been sent over to the Senate for action. Stay tuned to FAIR for updates…


http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011080...st-8-2011.html

ggalicia 08-08-2011 06:09 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
H. R 1933 work for Dreamers seeking Nursing Jobs?

DreamerSD23 08-08-2011 06:19 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
Coming from a website with a domain name such as "www.rightsidenews.com" probably means this is not going to help any of us.

ggalicia 08-08-2011 06:25 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
the H. R. 1933 would mostly benefit, filipino community, I have dialysis and its mostly filipino staff, that come from the philippines

drock226 08-08-2011 06:46 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
This doesn't necessarily benefit any dreamers. If you look up the PDF file of the bill it says its for people who are RN and can work in their country of origin. They can find a facility here in America that will be willing to sponsor them and will be given a Visa for I think 3 years?

I don't think anyone that's a dreamer who will graduate or has graduated from a nursing program here in America could qualify. I do hope I am wrong but for the matter at least there is a sense that we are heading towards the right direction regarding immigration.

It might be small and tiny steps but regardless its a step in the right direction.......should these bills pass that is lol.


http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-10...-106publ95.pdf

ggalicia 08-08-2011 06:55 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
So it would benefit any one living in another country, but USA?

drock226 08-08-2011 07:00 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ggalicia (Post 229882)
So it would benefit any one living in another country, but USA?

To some extent, but it also pressures the leaders of this country to fix our broken immigration system first and deal with what's on hand. Why pour more water into a glass that is already full? That's what I think of it. I do wish it benefits us all though.

carnivore 08-08-2011 07:19 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
(H.R. 398 at § 1(a)) Under current law, when a legal resident marries a foreign national, the alien spouse is granted lawful permanent residence on a conditional basis for the first two years they are in the country. (INA § 216(a)(1)) The Attorney General removes this conditional status only after he makes a favorable determination that the marriage between the alien spouse and petitioner is legitimate. (INA § 216(c))


If I understood it correctly, this sounds like good news for those of us who want to get married someday.

ggalicia 08-08-2011 07:53 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
The only reason Lamar Smith sponsored Bill H. R. 1933 is because it means cheap labor, it wouldn't help with the immigration problem, in fact a lot of Republicans want to increase the visas limit to bring more work force from overseas even thought they have qualified individual ready to work here in the states. I know a lot of person that have papers that are in the medical field that cant find a job unless they take a job cut, I'm sure if Bill H. R. 1933 passes a lot of the work force would earn less, but I remember Rep Stephen King complained that dreamers would take advantage of chain migration, well with this bill the chain migration will grow and we the dreamers will remain in the same boat, while others that have not suffered like us will have IT MADE :-(

drock226 08-08-2011 08:20 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ggalicia (Post 229896)
The only reason Lamar Smith sponsored Bill H. R. 1933 is because it means cheap labor, it wouldn't help with the immigration problem, in fact a lot of Republicans want to increase the visas limit to bring more work force from overseas even thought they have qualified individual ready to work here in the states. I know a lot of person that have papers that are in the medical field that cant find a job unless they take a job cut, I'm sure if Bill H. R. 1933 passes a lot of the work force would earn less, but I remember Rep Stephen King complained that dreamers would take advantage of chain migration, well with this bill the chain migration will grow and we the dreamers will remain in the same boat, while others that have not suffered like us will have IT MADE :-(

Well let's hope and pray something happens real soon that will help us....

ggalicia 08-08-2011 08:22 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by drock226 (Post 229902)
Well let's hope and pray something happens real soon that will help us....

I really hope so

Eddy117 08-09-2011 08:46 AM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carnivore (Post 229887)
(H.R. 398 at § 1(a)) Under current law, when a legal resident marries a foreign national, the alien spouse is granted lawful permanent residence on a conditional basis for the first two years they are in the country. (INA § 216(a)(1)) The Attorney General removes this conditional status only after he makes a favorable determination that the marriage between the alien spouse and petitioner is legitimate. (INA § 216(c))


If I understood it correctly, this sounds like good news for those of us who want to get married someday.

Not at all. This applies more to people who have "followed the rules" and have petitioned to come to the U.S. after marrying a citizen/resident from their home country...the 10 year ban for those who are currently here illegally still applies regardless of marriage to a citizen/legal resident.

Eddy117 08-09-2011 09:00 AM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by drock226 (Post 229902)
Well let's hope and pray something happens real soon that will help us....

well there's your problem...you're wasting your time praying while you should be informing people about our cause...i was actually surprised how little my closest friends knew about illegal immigration and DREAMERS and most are more than willing to help me in any way they can. :P

drock226 08-09-2011 01:02 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eddy117 (Post 229964)
well there's your problem...you're wasting your time praying while you should be informing people about our cause...i was actually surprised how little my closest friends knew about illegal immigration and DREAMERS and most are more than willing to help me in any way they can. :P

Oh believe me when I was in high school me and my friends made videos about the dream act and somehow tied it to our school work. We made dozens and nearly all the students and staff has heard and seen our videos. They were not the best quality videos but it sure did its damn job.

All I'm saying is that when sometimes things don't go you're way and the current situation you are in looks so dark I would pray for comfort. Aside from informing the nation about the dream act I firmly believe in the power of prayer as well.

Nic89 08-09-2011 03:55 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carnivore (Post 229887)
(H.R. 398 at § 1(a)) Under current law, when a legal resident marries a foreign national, the alien spouse is granted lawful permanent residence on a conditional basis for the first two years they are in the country. (INA § 216(a)(1)) The Attorney General removes this conditional status only after he makes a favorable determination that the marriage between the alien spouse and petitioner is legitimate. (INA § 216(c))


If I understood it correctly, this sounds like good news for those of us who want to get married someday.

No, its only for whoes outside US. But really wish atleast they can remove 10yr ban from dremers only and let them apply from here if there eligible.

Imagine 08-09-2011 06:31 PM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
God help us!

elihu 08-14-2011 02:48 AM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nic89 (Post 230006)
No, its only for whoes outside US. But really wish atleast they can remove 10yr ban from dremers only and let them apply from here if there eligible.

Actually, marriage to a U.S. citizen, in most cases, will confer conditional permanent residency for two years on the spouse after the spouse applies for adjustment of status. According to the INA, spouses are eligible for adjustment even if they are out-of-status or have worked without authorization. As long as the person in question entered with a valid visa and is otherwise eligible, there should be no problem in applying for adjustment.

The citation from INA basically stipulates that the conditional part of the permanent residency is removed after two years (and another interview), where a USCIS officer determines that the marriage is valid, whereupon the person now has permanent residency.

The only issue that arises from the ten-year or three-year ban (if anyone plans on getting married early :P) is staying outside of the country for more than six months while a permanent resident. Trying to enter again is considered applying for admission, in which case the person will be denied (from my limited understanding) for the unlawful presence.

Bottom line: if you get married to a U.S. citizen, adjust and don't travel outside the country frequently until you're also a citizen.

elihu 08-14-2011 02:55 AM

Re: House passes 2 immigration bills before recess.
 
Legal References:

INA 245(c)(2) prohibits adjustment for those without status or who've accepted unauthorized employment; however, it also does state:

Quote:

(other than an immediate relative as defined in section 201(b)...)
And 201(b) calls immediate relatives:

Quote:

For purposes of this subsection, the term "immediate relatives" means the children, spouses, and parents of a citizen of the United States, except that, in the case of parents, such citizens shall be at least 21 years of age.
Only catch here is that spouse, because of the Defense of Marriage Act, can only be of the opposite sex, but that's another matter.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.