![]() |
Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
“There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it, says Sen. Chuck Schumer. And says they are very close to a compromise on DACA." @WNYC
- @RebeIbarraC via eva02 seems like there will be indeed christmas relief, im not sure if its gc's. i told u guys something might happen today, those DREAMers that got arrested at Senator Schumer's office had something to do with it. they literally are not giving their names to the police which means they could be deported. My source was Belen Sisa. |
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
I want to believe...
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
This was 7 hours ago...why didn't he tell that to DREAMers who were arrested at his office or at least publically say it?
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Hopefully he keeps his word
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Yayyyyyyy that is a good source! Told ya my dreamers!!
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
I'd like to get off this roller coaster
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
maybe he was busy and wasnt at his office.
he prolly wants to keep it under wraps, i hope. lol Quote:
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Man I'm 100% positive there is going to be relief for dreamers this December. It's already written in stone.
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Do it, and let the English see you do it.
--Braveheart |
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
maybe 99.9% its not a sure thing.
Quote:
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Finally you guys got what you wanted... lol
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
There will be Another CR taking us into January. Schumer said no spending bill without DACA, spending bill will be done in January. No Christmas GCs.
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Please pass on 22nd, fuck this wait.
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
It should include all Dreamers or none at all. That is a risk *I* am willing to take :)
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Well Schumer is trying to tie a compromise to the spending bill instead of a clean dream act.
The compromise has a greater chance of passage. They have been promising a clean dream act since September. I think they want the compromise bill attached to the spending bill but since both sides can’t agree... Dems should just offer up dream act in exchange for border security. Many moderate republicans would come on board. Tied to the spending bill it is sure to pass. |
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
When he says provision do you think he just referring to a provision to halt deportation for dreamer and such or the DA?
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
There it is. Spinal reconstruction surgery.
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Apparently the press conference was mostly about net neutrality, guess it overshadowed the daca statement.
I’m trying to get more info... |
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Saw some posts on twitter on DACA. Illegals, drport them, build the wall, they entered illegally dont give them papers, ppls asking politicians to not grant daca etc. People hate so much. Or are they ignorant?
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
the majority is ignorant ppl.
the question i hate the most, “they been here that long, y couldnt they just apply to be a citizen?” Quote:
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
"(Insert high percentage) of illegals are receiving freebies with our hard earned money." |
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
My favorite line: "no amnesty for illegals. They need to get to the back of the line and come here legally" To that I say the imaginary line they speak of doesn't exist. Especially when you have things, like 90 day fiance. |
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
not nearly the cyber police force for us as they are for lgbt/muslim/blah blah white supremacy bs. |
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
you're delusional. |
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
There are lgbt immigrants too you know. Organizations have spoken on that. The religious left is on our side as well. List goes on and on. The only reason there hasn’t been an uproar is because trump sunset the program into March and we haven’t seen it’s devasting effects. But believe me, people are pissed and ready to fight for us. If not, then they simply don’t add to the negative rhetoric on immigrants like the right does. I know your a closet conservative |
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
so who are our true allies in our struggle?
Quote:
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
i dont think he's anything. he's just here to rile up the liberals. if he was on an ALIPAC forum he'd be acting like a looney liberal and rile up the conservatives.
im coo w/ whatever he says, its just funny sometimes. lol Quote:
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Congress has passed a short-term spending bill, delaying the final decision about whether or not to include a clean DREAM Act until December 22nd. In response, we will be taking massive nonviolent direct action in Washington DC and in cities nationwide on December 18th-22nd, starting on the 7th anniversary of when the original DREAM Act died in the Senate, to demand permanent protection for all undocumented youth.
There will be more protests against democrats like the one today |
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
this year is literally the only time they've ever shown they actually give a shit for daca like they have. what negative rhetoric am i adding? im not a conservative or a liberal, i support any and all politicians who aren't complete scum. |
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Quote:
maybe she's right and they would care in march, but it would help a lot more if they did right now. |
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Senate is looking good, but we also need to House to compromise. House is our biggest problem right now.
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
His statement about 'retroactive daca' is worrysome. Wtf, at a minimum they should mandate to prevent the deportation or removal of those who qualify for the DreamAct, NOT Daca, so that they can protect those who arrived as children, those who have TPS and those who aged out of Daca, even if the benefit portion (residency, citizenship) are negotiated in the meantime.
|
Re: Schumer: There will not be a spending bill without a DACA provision in it.
Democratic Congresswoman Jackie Spier said Friday the “rumor on the Hill” is that President Donald Trump intends to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller next week when Congress is gone for the holidays.
“The rumor on the Hill when I left yesterday was that the president was going to make a significant speech at the end of next week,” Spier told KQED. “And on Dec. 22nd, when we are out of D.C., he was going to fire Robert Mueller.” |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.