![]() |
New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...to-Motion.html
Not sure what this all means. Anyone with knowledge of legal lingo explain? |
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Renewals will continue, Paxton fails again.
Page 12, court does not grant summary judgement to plaintiffs. |
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
2Face,Smooth and these dap redHats who want daca dead in rooooinns
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Paxton is what 0-3 now? idk i lost track..
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Paxton should stop using as a distraction to his corruption case. I’m glad he took another loss!
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
What....no where does it say the summer judgement is denied. This the Trump admin responding.....
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
That bears good news for higher appellate court rulings
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Yeah, you should see his wife trying to pass a law that will help him out with his felony charge
http://www.kut.org/post/sen-paxton-f...securities-law |
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
And yes Angela Paxton (Ken Paxton's wife) is a Texas State Senator.
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Welp. This is extra bad news for us, amigos.
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
how so? its the same shit that happens ending in nothing. we thought somethings gonna happen on Friday and the Friday before that and the Friday 3 mos ago.
what comes out in all of this? nothing. nothing is gonna happen till it hits the Supreme Court. Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
The question is. Why is this mofo not in jail. If people are put in jail some times for a traffic stop, why this felon not in jail. They need more aggressive prosecutors and judges for his selfish son of a gun
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
What possible legal argument can be made gives how all of the legal arguments here have already been made? |
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
The tides turn when people start believing republicans, it'll actually hurt dems because people will think "if dems can't get something with 70%+ public support and some republican sympathy passed through congress, how can they do anything?" and start questioning what they're promising in the 2020 election (that's not DACA related). In short, if republicans force dems on dreamers before the election, dems will fight hard, at least harder than they are now. Dems need an anchor. Something they promised and something they can cling on to as real policy and it's passed as law, especially during election season. That way it's not just all talk. The most likely thing that fits in this political climate is dreamers. In all honesty, I believe that's what happened to the 25 bil for DACA deal. The problem then was the 4 pillars thrown in and dems had no real leverage to negotiate anything. Dems also put too much into it now (Schumer shutdown the government for 3 days and Pelosi gave a long speech in the House) for them to just shrug and do nothing. Ultimately, I think DACA will renew until SCOTUS decides or something passes in Congress. Dreamers' fate is with Congress, not the Judicial branch. They can delay / speed up Congress' priorities though. |
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
sucks...
your body was ready huh? Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
Where are you planning to go? Any trips planned? |
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
Few countries for fun. |
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
I will see you in Paris |
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
u wont be covered since you are a permanent resident now. = (
damn bro, so u been just mocking us real dreamers this whole time? not nice. Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Good, I hope now DA user can finally leave us at peace and stop mocking us
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
|
Re: New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Response to Motion
Quote:
I was in FB1 category and used 245i to do AOS. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.