DREAM Act Portal Forum - 60 senators still possible

DREAM Act Portal Forum (http://dreamact.info/forum/index.php)

- The News Room (http://dreamact.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=23)

- - 60 senators still possible (http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=9580)

60 senators still possible

Sen. Judd Gregg may be tapped by Obama for Commerce Sec.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,1157951.story

Reporting from Washington -- Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) is under consideration for the Commerce secretary post in President Obama's Cabinet, raising the prospect that Democrats could gain a filibuster-proof majority of 60 seats in the Senate, according to two officials familiar with the selection process.

Since the governor, who would appoint the replacement, is a democrat it is a good possibility that the replacement would be a democrat or someone more left.

This of course isn't a sure thing for immigration, but it is good for a bipartisan idea like the DA, and passing more liberal policy.

Re: 60 senators still possible

Jumping for joy!!
..... or not.

We'll see. I just don't like disappointment!! :-)

Re: 60 senators still possible

This is great news - now just a waiting game...

Re: 60 senators still possible

Please Please Please Sen. Gregg, please take Commerce. Gregg must realize he has a target on his back in 2010 by New Hampshire Democrats, and he hasn't had a competitive race in a long time. Commerce can afford Gregg a new chapter of public service instead of going down to possible defeat like his defeated New Hampshire colleague, former Sen. Sununu.

Re: 60 senators still possible

It is a great news. But not democrat will for it but they are very few. I believe we do have possible 60 vote for dream but not CIR.

Re: 60 senators still possible

My opinion is the outcome of his choice would not affect DREAM at all since DREAM has a bipartisian support. Of course, it would be nice if we have 60 democrat senators, just don't lose hope when Sen. Judd Gregg decides to stay in the Senate. Remember that we still have some Democrat losers that vote against the DREAM Act!

Re: 60 senators still possible

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/...009-01-30.html

It seems that even if he doesn't leave we can probably count on his vote. He was been voting alongside democrats this year on most of the current bills in the senate (4/5 of them), so even if he doesn't take the job, he probably would vote for cloture on the DA.

Re: 60 senators still possible

how about the House, are things looking for the Dream??

Re: 60 senators still possible

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianLeon (Post 118230)

how about the House, are things looking for the Dream??

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/...009-01-30.html

The house has a democratic filibuster proof majority: "On the morning after the House passed an $819 billion package of stimulus spending and tax cuts without a single Republican vote in favor, the action moved to the Senate, where Republicans began mobilizing for a fight."

Our emphasis should be on getting dream through the senate.

Re: 60 senators still possible

I almost leaped when i rea about this hahha :)

Re: 60 senators still possible

Politico: GOP Fights to keep Gregg in the Senate

Quote:

Republicans in Washington and New Hampshire are mounting a full-court press to keep Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) in the Senate and out of the Obama administration, aides and senators said Friday.

But if he does take the commerce secretary job, they want a commitment that New Hampshire’s Democratic governor will appoint a Republican senator so the party holds at least 41 seats, the minimum needed to sustain filibusters. No such commitments have been made, even as Granite State Republican sources tell Politico they are worried Gregg will take the Cabinet job if offered it by Obama.

Quote:

[NH Gov.] Lynch spokesman Colin Manning stayed out of it: “This is between the White House and Sen. Gregg and I am going to have to refer questions to them.”

Quote:

Friends tell Politico they expect Gregg to accept the seat if it’s offered, even though Gregg has only confirmed he is under consideration and would not comment further. Gregg has to run for reelection next year and could lose in his increasingly Democratic state.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Friday that Obama told him “a final decision had not been made. . .until the president asks me to make a personnel announcement from this podium, I’ll refrain from getting into any names.”

Quote:

The job offers some obvious attractions. Gregg, 61, would have to spend heavily in 2010 to keep his seat and would be a top GOP target. And instead of being a part of a slimmer GOP minority, he would command a major department that would have a big role in responding to the deepening economic recession.

Quote:

Earlier Thursday, several well-connected New Hampshire Republicans said they were skeptical that Gregg would accept.

These sources noted that Gregg has fundraisers lined up as far into the calendar as April. But they also acknowledged that Gregg has spoken positively about Obama.

“Judd Gregg not running for reelection makes it extremely interesting,” Kathy Sullivan, a former New Hampshire Democratic chairwoman, said with evident glee in her voice.

Senate Republicans are, to state the obvious, far less joyful.

Re: 60 senators still possible

NYT: Republican Senator is Top Choice to Run Commerce Dept.

Quote:

Senator Judd Gregg, Republican of New Hampshire, is the top contender to be President Obama’s nominee for commerce secretary, the White House said Saturday, a move that could strengthen Democrats’ control of Congress.

Quote:

A senior Obama administration official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because a formal announcement had not been made, said that Mr. Gregg was “now the leading candidate” for the commerce post and that a selection “could come as early as Monday.”

The selection of Mr. Gregg, who is in his third term as a senator, could open the door to a significant shift in the Congressional balance of power.

At present, the Democrats’ Senate majority is 58, which includes two independents; that number will rise to 59 if Al Franken is seated after the legal challenge to the results of the Minnesota Senate race is completed.

If Gov. John Lynch of New Hampshire, a Democrat, replaced Mr. Gregg with a member of his own party, that would put the Democratic majority at 60 — a magic number in the Senate because it is how many votes are needed to control the legislative agenda and to block a filibuster.

But there are no guarantees that Mr. Lynch would pick a Democrat: New Hampshire prizes its political independence, and the governor is a moderate. Some analysts say he could turn to a well-regarded Republican — former Senator Warren Rudman has been mentioned — to serve as a kind of caretaker to fill out the remainder of Mr. Gregg’s term, which expires at the end of 2010.

Quote:

But Mr. Gregg has lately been saying nice things about Mr. Obama. Last week, the senator was quoted as calling the president a “tour de force.”