DREAM Act Portal Forum

DREAM Act Portal Forum (http://dreamact.info/forum/index.php)
-   The Lounge (http://dreamact.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   🚨AP and Inadmissibilities‼️🤔 (http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=84958)

Alby 06-04-2021 07:56 PM

🚨AP and Inadmissibilities‼️🤔
 
Let’s suppose someone has inadmissibilities for a visa. Permanent bar due to double entry, gang membership, alcoholism, maybe they falsely claimed US citizenship as a kid.

But let’s say, they have DACA and get approved for AP.

Would they still be able to come back with AP❓

Demise 06-05-2021 01:43 AM

Re: 🚨AP and Inadmissibilities‼️��
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alby (Post 760631)
Let’s suppose someone has inadmissibilities for a visa. Permanent bar due to double entry, gang membership, alcoholism, maybe they falsely claimed US citizenship as a kid.

But let’s say, they have DACA and get approved for AP.

Would they still be able to come back with AP❓

I mean, I wouldn't try it, while inadmissibilities are not statutory bars to parole, they are de facto bars. Like maybe you can slip under the radar and they don't notice and parole you in but do you really want to risk it, and if yes - why?

Alby 06-05-2021 09:37 PM

Re: 🚨AP and Inadmissibilities‼️��
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Demise (Post 760638)
I mean, I wouldn't try it, while inadmissibilities are not statutory bars to parole, they are de facto bars. Like maybe you can slip under the radar and they don't notice and parole you in but do you really want to risk it, and if yes - why?

Because I’m tired of living in this golden cage. I found this, What do you think❓

C. A Parolee Seeking Entry and the Grounds of Inadmissibility
Although a parolee does not need to be admissible, Custom and Border Patrol (CBP) has discretion to screen for the grounds of inadmissibility at the border. This is at odds with the actual nature of parole, which is a means of lawful entry that is not an admission, and is often specifically granted to people who are otherwise inadmissible. Arguably, a parolee should be allowed in even if a ground of inadmissibility applies, because a parole entry is not an admission. Nonetheless, immigrants seeking parole should know that CBP still screens these applicants, and can exercise discretion to deny entry. See Chapter 7 for more information about the risks of traveling or entering with parole.



http://https://www.ilrc.org/sites/default/files/sample-pdf/parole-1st_ed-2016-ch_01.pdf

Demise 06-06-2021 04:30 PM

Re: 🚨AP and Inadmissibilities‼️��
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alby (Post 760646)
Because I’m tired of living in this golden cage. I found this, What do you think❓

C. A Parolee Seeking Entry and the Grounds of Inadmissibility
Although a parolee does not need to be admissible, Custom and Border Patrol (CBP) has discretion to screen for the grounds of inadmissibility at the border. This is at odds with the actual nature of parole, which is a means of lawful entry that is not an admission, and is often specifically granted to people who are otherwise inadmissible. Arguably, a parolee should be allowed in even if a ground of inadmissibility applies, because a parole entry is not an admission. Nonetheless, immigrants seeking parole should know that CBP still screens these applicants, and can exercise discretion to deny entry. See Chapter 7 for more information about the risks of traveling or entering with parole.



http://https://www.ilrc.org/sites/default/files/sample-pdf/parole-1st_ed-2016-ch_01.pdf

Let me ask you a better question - why are you inadmissible?

Alby 06-06-2021 05:42 PM

Re: 🚨AP and Inadmissibilities‼️��
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Demise (Post 760652)
Let me ask you a better question - why are you inadmissible?

Because the stupid coyote told me to say USC at the port of entry. That’s a forever ban. However, I was 15 at the time and I had no knowledge of what I was doing. Even some immigration lawyers have told me that if I marry and go to Juarez; I could return and there are documented cases where minors with a USC false claim have returned. I guess it will up to the consulate how sympathetic they are. It’s even in the consular manual that minors are not to be held responsible for this false claim. But I applied for AP, and I want to go to MX. maybe Kamala helps if it becomes big and I get denied entry❓🤔

skyisthelimit 06-08-2021 03:15 AM

Re: 🚨AP and Inadmissibilities‼️🤔
 
Did they fingerprint or document you at the port of entry?

Imagine 06-09-2021 02:05 PM

Re: 🚨AP and Inadmissibilities‼️🤔
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by skyisthelimit (Post 760692)
Did they fingerprint or document you at the port of entry?

This.

taoni10 06-09-2021 03:28 PM

Re: 🚨AP and Inadmissibilities‼️��
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alby (Post 760646)
Because I’m tired of living in this golden cage. I found this, What do you think❓

C. A Parolee Seeking Entry and the Grounds of Inadmissibility
Although a parolee does not need to be admissible, Custom and Border Patrol (CBP) has discretion to screen for the grounds of inadmissibility at the border. This is at odds with the actual nature of parole, which is a means of lawful entry that is not an admission, and is often specifically granted to people who are otherwise inadmissible. Arguably, a parolee should be allowed in even if a ground of inadmissibility applies, because a parole entry is not an admission. Nonetheless, immigrants seeking parole should know that CBP still screens these applicants, and can exercise discretion to deny entry. See Chapter 7 for more information about the risks of traveling or entering with parole.



http://https://www.ilrc.org/sites/default/files/sample-pdf/parole-1st_ed-2016-ch_01.pdf

It is basically all up to the border patrol agents if they want to let you in or no. I will not risk to do an AP unless you have plan of never coming back.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.