![]() |
USCIS Response Letter to 66 senators and congress members Advance Parole
U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office of the Director (MS 2000) Washington, DC 20529-2000
April 12, 2019 The Honorable Alan Lowenthal United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Lowenthal: Thank you for your February 12, 2019 letter to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). As you note in your letter, several federal courts have imposed nationwide preliminary injunctions against the DHS, including U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), with regard to the rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy while the litigation proceeds on its merits. However, no court order that is currently in effect enjoins the decision by former Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, to cease accepting and adjudicating advance parole requests under standards associated with the DACA policy as of September 5, 2017. Therefore, DHS continues to adhere to the former Acting Secretary's decision with respect to such advance parole requests. Responses to your questions, to the extent possible while litigation is ongoing, are enclosed. The co-signers of your letter will receive separate, identical responses. Should you require any additional assistance, please have your staff contact the USCIS Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs at (202) 272-1940. Respectfully, 2. Fuai L. Francis Cissna Director Enclosures ------------ The Department of Homeland Security’s Response to Senator Harris’ February 12, 2019 Letter 1. Please provide a detailed explanation about why USCIS has failed to exercise its lawful discretion to allow DACA recipients to apply for or receive advance parole for humanitarian, educational, and employment purposes since September 5, 2017. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is no longer accepting or approving Form I-131 applications from DACA recipients under the standards associated with the DACA policy. Enclosed please find a copy of the following documents: 1) DHS former Acting Secretary Elaine Duke's September 5, 2017 Memorandum titled, “Rescission of the June 15, 2012 Memorandum titled ‘Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children;” 2) Frequently Asked Questions: Rescission Of Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals (DACA) dated September 5, 2017; and 3) Memorandum from Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen dated June 22, 2018, that was submitted in connection with the pending lawsuit: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) et al v. Trump, No.17-cv-02325-JDB (D.D.C. 2017) 2. Please clarify if USCIS is now treating DACA recipients differently than other deferred action recipients with respect to advance parole applications, and if so, provide an explanation, including how other advance parole applications are adjudicated. Under section 212(d)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the Secretary of Homeland Security may, in his or her discretion, parole into the United States any alien applying for admission to the United States on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. As stated in the cover letter and the response to Question 1, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) continues to abide by the policy regarding advance parole set forth in Acting Secretary Duke’s September 5, 2017 memorandum. The DACA rescission memorandum does not preclude a DACA recipient from requesting advance parole under standards not associated with the DACA policy, provided he or she falls within one of the other (non DACA-related) categories of individuals who may seek an Advance Parole Document while they are in the United States. These categories are listed in the Instructions for Form I-131, Application for Travel Document, which have been provided as a separate enclosure. 3. Please provide complete documentation of any research and analysis DHS and USCIS have conducted since 2012 about benefits to individuals, educational institutions, employers, and the American economy of allowing DACA recipient to apply for advance parole. DHS cannot comment regarding research and analysis informing former Acting Secretary Duke’s decision to rescind the DACA policy, including the granting of advance parole based on standards associated with the DACA policy on September 5, 2017, as this matter is the subject of ongoing litigation. April 2019 Page 2 4. Please provide complete written documentation of DHS and USCIS policy relating to advance parole applications and adjudications from DACA recipients since January 2017, including all research and analysis informing the policy shift since September 5, 2017. Please reference the following documents which are enclosed or a link has been provided: 1) DHS former Acting Secretary Elaine Duke's September 5, 2017 Memorandum titled, “Rescission of the June 15, 2012 Memorandum Entitled ‘Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children;” 2) Frequently Asked Questions: Rescission Of Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals (DACA) dated September 5, 2017; 3) Instructions for Form I-131, Application for Travel Document; and 4) Archived USCIS DACA FAQ 57 & 59 https://www.uscis.gov/archive/frequently-asked- questions. The DACA-related sections of the Form I-821D Instructions and the archived USCIS DACA FAQs were drafted prior to January 2017, but remained in effect until the DACA rescission memo was issued on September 5, 2017. DHS cannot comment regarding research and analysis informing former Acting Secretary Duke’s decision to rescind the DACA policy, including the granting of advance parole based on standards associated with the DACA policy on September 5, 2017, as this matter is the subject of ongoing litigation. 5. Please provide complete written documentation on guidance and training provided to USCIS employees regarding adjudications of advance parole applications from DACA recipients and communications with DACA recipients about advance parole and international travel, including on advising DACA recipients about risks to their DACA status of travel abroad, since January 2017. USCIS did not issue any new guidance or training materials after January 2017 with respect to adjudication policies or procedures for advance parole applications filed by DACA recipients until the DACA rescission memo was issued on September 5, 2017. From January 2017 to September 5, 2017, USCIS operated under the same guidance and training materials that were drafted and issued during the prior administration. For your reference, USCIS has included relevant materials pertaining to the adjudication policies and procedures on DACA- based advance parole applications that USCIS operated under from January 2017 to September 5, 2017. Please reference the following documents which are enclosed or for which a link has been provided: 1) USCIS DACA Standard Operating Procedures; 2) Relevant internal DACA FAQs; 3) Advance Parole DACA PowerPoint April 2016; and 4) Archived DACA FAQs 56-59 https://www.uscis.gov/archive/freque...sked-questions. After the DACA rescission memo was issued on September 5, 2017, various USCIS operational components implemented the parameters of the memo, including the guidance in the memo on administratively closing and refunding the fees on all pending Form I-131 applications that were filed under the standards associated with the DACA policy. Please see USCIS’ responses to Questions 6 and 7 for additional information and attachments related to correspondence materials that were issued to DACA recipients whose Form I-131 applications were administratively closed after September 5, 2017, or whose Form I-131 April 2019 Page 3 applications were denied in specific circumstances described in USCIS’ response to Question 7. Regarding communication with DACA recipients about advance parole, or risks to their DACA status of travel abroad, USCIS has issued several public documents which instruct DACA requestors and recipients on the negative consequences of traveling abroad after August 15, 2012, without first obtaining advance parole, to include the automatic termination of an individual’s DACA and the denial of an individual’s pending DACA request, if applicable. These documents were issued prior to January 2017, but remained in effect after January 2017. They remain available on the USCIS website and warning language remains included in the form instructions for the Form I-821D and Form I-131. While USCIS stopped approving requests for advance parole under the standards associated with DACA in accordance with the DACA rescission memorandum, the consequences of traveling abroad without obtaining advance parole remain the same for DACA requestors and recipients as they were before the rescission memorandum and as they were before January 2017. Additionally, USCIS has provided general warnings regarding advance parole including detailed instructions on the conditions, limitations, and discretionary nature of advance parole. USCIS has included these warnings and information in public FAQs, Form Instructions, the Form I-512L, issued to individuals granted advance parole, and in various other public documents USCIS has shared with the public. You may review many of these documents and information at: https://www.uscis.gov/archive/consid...ferred-action- childhood-arrivals-daca. Also, for your convenience, enclosed please find a copy of the following documents: 1) Instructions for Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, Form I-821D; 2) Instructions for Application for Travel Document, Form I-131; 3) Examples of Form I-512L (single and multiple entry); 4) DACA-Toolkit; 5) DACA-Presentation; 6) DACA- Flier; and 7) Archived DACA FAQs 56-59 https://www.uscis.gov/archive/frequently-asked- questions. 6. Please provide complete written documentation on USCIS policies, procedures, and processes to inform DACA recipients who submitted advance parole applications prior to September 5, 2017 about the status of their applications, including issuance of notices of intent to deny and final decisions to deny, and to refund their application fees following the policy shift. Enclosed is a copy of the letter USCIS sent to applicants with a pending DACA-based Form I-131 as of September 5, 2017, notifying them that USCIS administratively closed their Form I-131 application in accordance with the DACA rescission memo, and informing them that the filing fee would be refunded. April 2019 Page 4 7. Please provide complete written documentation on USCIS policies, procedures, and processes to inform DACA recipients who submitted advance parole applications after September 5, 2017 about the status of their applications, including issuance of notices of intent to deny and final decisions to deny, and to refund their application fees following the policy shift. Enclosed is a sample of the Form I-131 rejection notice USCIS provides to individuals who have submitted DACA-based Form I-131s after September 5, 2017. Please note that certain Form I-131 applications filed by DACA recipients after September 5, 2017 were not rejected by USCIS at intake because the applicant filed the I-131 at a USCIS filing location other than the filing location previously designated for DACA-based Form I-131 applications. USCIS denied these Form I-131 applications. Enclosed are redacted example notices of an intent to deny and denial notice that were used for these Form I-131 applications. 8. Please provide the total annual number of applications USCIS received from DACA recipients for advance parole, broken down by humanitarian, educational, or employment purposes, as well as the number of such applications approved, respectively, during each fiscal year from 2012-2018. Please also provide a monthly breakdown of this data. See enclosed spreadsheet. 9. Please provide the total number of applications USCIS received from DACA recipients for humanitarian parole as well as the number of such applications approved since September 5, 2017. See enclosed spreadsheet. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S35...nmbTJ-XGN/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/15dQ...O0bE7BU43/view There are about 50 DACA that are going in June to advocate advance parole. Please help by donating or participating advanceparole.org |
Re: USCIS Response Letter to 66 senators and congress members Advance Parole
too long, anyone mind to summarize all that crap in 1 or 2 paragraphs ?
|
Re: USCIS Response Letter to 66 senators and congress members Advance Parole
Quote:
|
Re: USCIS Response Letter to 66 senators and congress members Advance Parole
Quote:
|
Re: USCIS Response Letter to 66 senators and congress members Advance Parole
USCIS basically said that none of the court rulings ruled that Advance Parole must be reinstated, so their decision to end Advance Parole for DACA stands.
|
Re: USCIS Response Letter to 66 senators and congress members Advance Parole
Basically, USCIS is saying "courts haven't ruled that we HAVE to continue accepting requests for AP from DACA recipients, and we don't want to. But mainly, we don't want to. So, go pound sand!"
|
Re: USCIS Response Letter to 66 senators and congress members Advance Parole
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: USCIS Response Letter to 66 senators and congress members Advance Parole
So.... the next President can rescind the DACA cancellation order, restart the program fully(including AP), and maybe even start DAPA following the administrative procedures act.
|
Re: USCIS Response Letter to 66 senators and congress members Advance Parole
Quote:
|
Re: USCIS Response Letter to 66 senators and congress members Advance Parole
I don't like how Blasie Ford showed up with lies to try and bring down Kavannaugh, however, I did like how he was paraded in the media as a villain.
Can we get some real facts up in this bitch to discredit this supreme court scoundrel? The supreme court is the part of the government the founding fathers paid least attention to, but given its importance, and the outsize role of congress and their inability to do anything, they should've paid more attention and made it similarly useless. A useless government means a free and secure populace. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.