DREAM Act Portal Forum

DREAM Act Portal Forum (http://dreamact.info/forum/index.php)
-   The News Room (http://dreamact.info/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   GOP's Rand Paul Slams Donald Trump's Migrant Deportation Plan: 'Terrible Image' (http://dreamact.info/forum/showthread.php?t=85782)

Copper 11-20-2024 04:29 PM

GOP's Rand Paul Slams Donald Trump's Migrant Deportation Plan: 'Terrible Image'
 
Quote:

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has said it would be a "terrible image" to use the United States Army to round up illegal immigrants as part of plans for mass deportations.

The nominated next Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee told Newsmax that he supported bringing back President-elect Donald Trump's Remain in Mexico policy but had reservations about other aspects of immigration plans.

Paul said that immigrants who had committed crime should be the first targets for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), claiming around 15,000 migrants in the U.S. had committed murder.

"I think if we start there, we will be fine," he said Tuesday. "I'm not in favor of sending the army in uniforms into our cities to collect people. I think it's a terrible image."


Paul said the military are not trained for such purposes and that it should be the job of law enforcement or domestic agencies to enforce immigration.

"While I am all for Remain in Mexico, I will not support an emergency to put the army into our cities. I think that is a huge mistake," he told the outlet.

Trump appeared to back declaring a national emergency in order to enable his mass deportations plan on Monday, with his spokesperson Karoline Leavitt telling Newsweek that the next administration would "marshal every federal and state power necessary" to implement the program.

Paul said he was not for declaring a national emergency, adding that such moves "smack of marshal rule. They smack of no Congressional approval".

During the first Trump presidency, when he tried to overturn DACA, Paul was one of 11 Republicans to vote against the plan, saying the move was illegal and needed Congressional approval.

The Senator said Tuesday that he was all for removing illegal immigrants, particularly those who had committed crimes, and for hardline policies such as Remain in Mexico, which would force arrivals to wait on the south side of the border while U.S. officials process their cases.

"There is to my mind some question of the people, the housekeeper who has been here thirty years, I don't see the military putting her in handcuffs and marching her down the street to an encampment," Paul said.

"I think that person, there might be an in-between solution where, if they are already working productively, we allow them to have a work permit. I would expand the idea of work permits but they don't get rewarded with voting."


Paul's comments appeared more moderate than others from the Trump campaign and those he has nominated to oversee immigration since his election win, including Steven Miller as Deputy Chief of Staff and Tom Homan as border czar.

Homan, former acting ICE chief, has warned all illegal immigrants that he is coming for them and to self-deport ahead of January, while Miller was one of the chief architects of the last Trump administration's border policies.

While Trump focused his campaign messaging on criminal illegal immigrants, the large numbers set to be targeted – upwards of 11 million – likely comprise the undocumented population in the U.S.

Migrant advocacy groups have raised concerns that those who entered the country illegally or overstayed visas decades ago and have families and jobs in the U.S. could be forcibly removed, despite not committing any other crimes.
https://www.newsweek.com/mass-deport...-trump-1989042

hDreamer1988 11-20-2024 06:07 PM

Re: GOP's Rand Paul Slams Donald Trump's Migrant Deportation Plan: 'Terrible Image'
 
he is not wrong. Such optics can turn the tide in the Dem's favor.. It might be enough to flip the House during the mid-terms

Got_Daca 11-20-2024 06:39 PM

Re: GOP's Rand Paul Slams Donald Trump's Migrant Deportation Plan: 'Terrible Image'
 
So everyone agrees that criminal undocs gotta go

Homan agrees, Rand Paul agrees, basically everyone with brain agrees.

VJB2 11-20-2024 06:52 PM

Re: GOP's Rand Paul Slams Donald Trump's Migrant Deportation Plan: 'Terrible Image'
 
I also agree that all criminals should be deported. All murderers, rapists, etc., should be on the first busses and planes.

Just leave us hardworking people alone! I just want to contribute to the only home I have known without being grouped or sat next to someone who shot or decapitated someone to death.

Pianoswithoutfaith 11-20-2024 08:03 PM

Re: GOP's Rand Paul Slams Donald Trump's Migrant Deportation Plan: 'Terrible Image'
 
lol you people realize magas and trump see us as criminals right?

DogJuiceMan 11-20-2024 10:28 PM

Re: GOP's Rand Paul Slams Donald Trump's Migrant Deportation Plan: 'Terrible Image'
 
The system

This is what happens when you have an out of control immigration system that punishes people who want to live here, play by the rules and earn their ticket. Is it too much to ask to let people who have lived here for decades, 20-30 in some cases, to earn their ticket? You end up with violent criminals like those tren de aragua venezuelan gangsters because there is no real "system."

You get people like the abuelitas, DACAs, and legitimate asylum seekers alongside hardened gangsters, veterans of the guerrilla wars, cartel members, mafiosos, and your average street trash. Its absolutely not a working system. They all want to focus on strict adherence to the law, but they themselves probably break at least 5 laws on a daily basis.

Wait 20+ years for your turn. They all love to talk about how they had a family member who waited 15, 18, 20 years for this and that. Its not a point of pride you know! Having to run through an awful system designed to waste your time is not something you should be proud of.

All systems should have a process where if you fall out of the happy path, you should have some means to recover state and return to the happy path.

I don't know what that system should look like.

2dreamORnot2dream 11-21-2024 03:16 AM

Re: GOP's Rand Paul Slams Donald Trump's Migrant Deportation Plan: 'Terrible Image'
 
I never understood why there was no option for dreamers to simply remove the 10yr ban and leave. Some of us have spent most of our lives here. We may want/need to visit once in the while. People die, get married, ect… Hack, they could have implemented a system where people that want to visit after self deporting put money into escrow while they are in the states. If they don’t leave on time give the money to “dog the bounty hunter” for finding and ejecting the “overstayer”. Make people wear an ankle bracelet while they are visiting the states. There is no common sense in the system.

cooltalker 11-21-2024 06:39 AM

Re: GOP's Rand Paul Slams Donald Trump's Migrant Deportation Plan: 'Terrible Image'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 2dreamORnot2dream (Post 772821)
I never understood why there was no option for dreamers to simply remove the 10yr ban and leave.

Exactly, I feel that the 10 year ban should be forgiven for dreamers so they might adjust via other existing means. This felt like common sense. I wonder if that's something that could have been done via executive action but who knows.

Demise 11-21-2024 09:47 AM

Re: GOP's Rand Paul Slams Donald Trump's Migrant Deportation Plan: 'Terrible Image'
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cooltalker (Post 772823)
Exactly, I feel that the 10 year ban should be forgiven for dreamers so they might adjust via other existing means. This felt like common sense. I wonder if that's something that could have been done via executive action but who knows.

It's a good question if you can.

The constitution says "The President [...] shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of impeachment.".

It merely states "offenses" not crimes or anything else, so it should apply to civil violations against the US. I know that it does apply to contempt of court which is a weird thing from the perspective of law when you consider that a judge can just fine you or toss you into a cell for mouthing off with no due process.

That being said, the only large pardons of inadmissibilities was when President Carter pardoned Vietnam War draft dodgers (and likely to lesser extend Biden's weed pardon). Since fleeing the country to avoid a draft will in fact make you inadmissible, though since draft dodging is also a crime, so that was more a side effect than the intent. Similar happens on smaller scales with individual pardons at both state and federal levels where a pardon can remove criminal-related inadmissibilities as the whole underlying crime causing said inadmissibility just goes poof.

This however brings us to a huge problem with the whole construction of unlawful presence, basically it is something that just gets applied automatically and technically it doesn't make you deportable from US and it definitely doesn't make you a criminal. Nobody gets deported or jailed for it either. You get deported for lack of status and unlawful presence is a side effect of lack of status.
There's also a similar problem with EWIs since even if entering illegally is technically a misdemeanor that can be pardoned, AOS requires you to have been "inspected and admitted or paroled" rather than something like "had not entered without inspection", so it still wouldn't let you AOS.

So all in all, the only way about it would be for a president to issue such a pardon and test it in courts, which causes a few other problems:
While I do believe that unlawful presence could be pardoned, I don't believe that the pardon could be applied to future periods of unlawful presence. So best it does is zero out the counter. Tomorrow it'd start ticking again. Now you've got 180 days to get out of the country, however there's no way you'd see any court rulings on the matter before the time is up, so by making use of it by leaving you are essentially taking a leap of faith.
Now, it'd help those who left and have a 10 year or lifetime ban or DACAers or TPS holders who had such a period of unlawful presence before getting DACA/TPS who want to do consular processing though it'd probably make more sense to see how the courts would rule first before jumping in head first.

Of course this is highly hypothetical since that'd require Biden to issue one like that on the way out.

Imthexman 11-21-2024 12:11 PM

Re: GOP's Rand Paul Slams Donald Trump's Migrant Deportation Plan: 'Terrible Image'
 
This is exactly what I have been thinking for the last 2 weeks. In fact, the letter signed by about 100 pro-immigration groups last summer to Biden (see links below) was asking for PARDONS, but ultimately Biden offered his PIP plan which was turned down almost overnight.

Now, if he were to issue pardons instead, the courts would not even have standing to bring them up in court, the president has the ability to issue pardons to whomever tf he wants PERIOD.
Wouldn’t it be nice if for example he issues pardons to people who have an order of deportation, EWOI etc. but who are not criminals and have been here for a long time?
I think he might do something before he leaves, specially because his PIP plan got shut down, he has not appeal it in court obviously because the next guys will shut it down, the smartest thing would be to issue pardons, those are permanent and hard if not impossible to challenge them in court imo.



https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/06/02/...pardon-process


Quote:

Originally Posted by Demise (Post 772824)
It's a good question if you can.

The constitution says "The President [...] shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of impeachment.".

It merely states "offenses" not crimes or anything else, so it should apply to civil violations against the US. I know that it does apply to contempt of court which is a weird thing from the perspective of law when you consider that a judge can just fine you or toss you into a cell for mouthing off with no due process.

That being said, the only large pardons of inadmissibilities was when President Carter pardoned Vietnam War draft dodgers (and likely to lesser extend Biden's weed pardon). Since fleeing the country to avoid a draft will in fact make you inadmissible, though since draft dodging is also a crime, so that was more a side effect than the intent. Similar happens on smaller scales with individual pardons at both state and federal levels where a pardon can remove criminal-related inadmissibilities as the whole underlying crime causing said inadmissibility just goes poof.

This however brings us to a huge problem with the whole construction of unlawful presence, basically it is something that just gets applied automatically and technically it doesn't make you deportable from US and it definitely doesn't make you a criminal. Nobody gets deported or jailed for it either. You get deported for lack of status and lawful presence is a side effect of lack of status.
There's also a similar problem with EWIs since even if entering illegally is technically a misdemeanor that can be pardoned, AOS requires you to have been "inspected and admitted or paroled" rather than something like "had not entered without inspection", so it still wouldn't let you AOS.

So all in all, the only way about it would be for a president to issue such a pardon and test it in courts, which causes a few other problems:
While I do believe that unlawful presence could be pardoned, I don't believe that the pardon could be applied to future periods of unlawful presence. So best it does is zero out the counter. Tomorrow it'd start ticking again. Now you've got 180 days to get out of the country, however there's no way you'd see any court rulings on the matter before the time is up, so by making use of it by leaving you are essentially taking a leap of faith.
Now, it'd help those who left and have a 10 year or lifetime ban or DACAers or TPS holders who had such a period of unlawful presence before getting DACA/TPS who want to do consular processing though it'd probably make more sense to see how the courts would rule first before jumping in head first.

Of course this is highly hypothetical since that'd require Biden to issue one like that on the way out.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.