http://metrotimes.com/news/story.asp?id=13954

Here is the link of the article.

Well, it had good points, the dreamer had the first and last word, which is very powerful. Pretty much he gave the first and the last impression.

Also, he you are around, you did great, thanks for the job.

What the article indicates, is that the extreme views of the opposition are seen as reputable. At least to a small online newspaper. Still, if the journalist wanted to give a balance story with pros and cons for the reader to decide, please pm me the name of a anti-dreamer that actually has a good point. They all suck. So, she is stuck in that sense.

Still, it is the job of the activists to make the opposition look bad. The same way they work hard to makes us look bad too. That is why many people think NCLR is an extreme group even though its former director is working on the Obama administration.

What I am going to do is to thank the journalist for her article and point her out as to why the opposition has no legs. Using terrorism and economic strains is not an argument but an appeal to fear. It will cause the very strains that they are trying to prevent. What we don't want is for this journalist to go from an of the fence to a hater because we are mishandling the situation.