Quote:
Originally Posted by KindaWant
.... so you were wrong.
|
wrong about what? point still stands border is still not secure enough for most people. you gonna take one quote from schumer (not to mention the fact that its his opinion), and present that as gospel? sure, go head, im sure that gives you peace of mind. thats up to you.
Quote:
You've got no arguement, you resort to putting words in my mouth then making a point against it.
What I did say/ask was, why are YOU only asking for 60% of the problem to be dealt with? Which you still have not answered.
|
oh you asked a question? sorry, your sentence didnt read even like one. i guess we're having a language issue here as well. if you want to ask someone a question, you need to form a questionaire. not say something and then turn around and say you were asking a question and didnt get an answer. rofl.
i never said we should only deal with 60% of the problem. what i said was we need to deal with it and focus on it because it is the highest source of illegal immigration. its common sense. yes we need to address visa overstays as well. that doesnt take away from the fact that border security needs to be improved immensely. understood?
Quote:
|
You pretty much proved yourself wrong here... if you go back and re-read what I wrote it said "following YOUR way of thinking:" which you just proved was wrong. - 1 for you.
|
you seem to have short term memory. i specifically said mexico has higher number of illegal immigrants coming in (7 million) compared to india (300,000) and thus more focus should be on border security. and then you followed that up with preposterous comparison of violent crimes to overstaying visa and traffic violations to crossing the border illegally which has no relevance to the fact that mexico has higher number of illegal immigrants. my way of thinking is based on pure numbers: focus on border security more because more illegal immigrants are coming in through the border. you shifted from that and started talkin about the severity of either types of actions for god knows why. so you completely strayed off from the topic and started another brand new argument. got it? no comprendo?
Quote:
|
The point came after you posted that "atleast they entered through inspection" which does not make a difference when it comes to the crime.
|
again you are straying off topic. we're not talking about the criminal act itself. what are you trying to argue? point still stands significantly more people are entering this country illegally through the border without inspection and the border needs to be addressed before CIR.
Quote:
|
My point is that "we need more border security" is not a reason to delay CIR because as people who actually know what they are talking about have said "we already have enough border secruity to move forward with CIR".
|
sorry, you need more then one person to qualify to use the word "people". you take one quote from one politician and take that as gospel. ok, i cant help with that.
Quote:
|
The Mexican border is not the only place illegal immigrants enter this country but you feel that it is the only place that needs added security I used India as an example of another problem DHS has to work on. I never said the Mexican border was not a problem; I said it was not the ONLY problem.
|
when did i say mexican border is the only problem? all i said was it was the biggest route through which illegal immigration is occurring, and thus needs more attention. seriously, you choose to debate me and yet with every post you seem to have hard time grasping main arguments and even your own sentences. its alright though.
oh im sorry my "rofl" hurt your feelings. i just find your confusion amusing.