The DREAM Act of 2010

S.3992, a new version of the DREAM Act introduced on November 30, includes numerous changes to
address concerns that have been raised by critics of the bill. Among other things, S. 3992:

1. Does not repeal the ban on in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants. The DREAM Act
would not allow undocumented immigrants to receive in-state tuition. The DREAM Act also
continues to prohibit students from obtaining Pell and other federal grants.

2. Lowers the age cap for eligibility for the DREAM Act to 29 on the date of enactment.
Additionally, in order to be eligible, individuals still must have come to the U.S. as a child (15
or under) and be a long-term resident (at least 5 years). An earlier version of the DREAM Act
(S. 1545 in the 108th
Congress), authored by Republican Senator Orrin Hatch and cosponsored
by Senator John McCain, did not include any age cap. This bill was approved by the
Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee on a 16-3 vote.

3. Does not grant legal permanent resident (LPR) status to anyone for at least 10 years. Previous
versions of the DREAM Act would have immediately granted LPR status to individuals who
met the bill’s requirements. Under S. 3992, an individual could obtain “conditional
nonimmigrant” status if he proves that he meets the age (currently 29 or under and arrived in
the U.S. at 15 or under) and residency requirements (5 years or more) and:

a. Has graduated from an American high school or obtained a GED;
b. Has been a person of "good moral character,” as determined by the Department of
Homeland Security, from the date the individual initially entered the U.S. (previous
versions of the DREAM Act only required an individual to be a person of good moral
character from the date of the bill’s enactment);
c. Submits biometric information;
d. Undergoes security and law-enforcement background checks;
e. Undergoes a medical examination; and
f. Registers for the Selective Service.

4. Further limits eligibility for conditional nonimmigrant status by specifically excluding anyone
who:

a. Has committed one felony or three misdemeanors;
b. Is likely to become a public charge;
c. Has engaged in voter fraud or unlawful voting;
d. Has committed marriage fraud;
e. Has abused a student visa;
f. Has engaged in persecution; or
g. Poses a public health risk.
Additionally, individuals would continue to be excluded if they have received a final order of
deportation, have engaged in criminal activity (as defined by the Immigration and Nationality
Act), or present a national security or terrorist threat.

5. Gives a conditional nonimmigrant the chance to earn legal immigrant status only after 10
years and only if he meets the DREAM Act’s college or military service requirements, and
other requirements, e.g., pays back taxes and demonstrates the ability to read, write, and
speak English and demonstrates knowledge and understanding of the fundamentals of the
history, principles, and form of government of the United States.

6. Further limits “chain migration.” DREAM Act individuals would have very limited ability to
sponsor family members for U.S. citizenship. They could never sponsor extended family
members and they could not begin the long process of sponsoring parents or siblings for at
least 12 years. Parents and siblings who entered the U.S. illegally would have to leave the
country for ten years before they could gain legal status and the visa backlog for siblings is
decades long.

7. Specifically excludes DREAM Act nonimmigrants from receiving any government subsidies to
participate in the health insurance exchanges created by the Affordable Care Act. Conditional
nonimmigrants also would be ineligible for Medicaid, Food Stamps and other entitlement
programs.

8. Establishes a one-year application deadline. An individual would be required to apply for
conditional nonimmigrant status within one year of obtaining a high school degree or GED,
being admitted to college, or the bill’s date of enactment.

9. Requires anyone applying for the DREAM Act to show that he is likely to qualify in order to
receive a stay of deportation while his application is pending. The DREAM Act is not a safe
harbor from deportation.

10. Requires robust information sharing. DHS must provide information from an individual’s
DREAM Act application to any federal, state, tribal, or local law enforcement agency, or
intelligence or national security agency in any criminal investigation or prosecution or for
homeland security or national security purposes.

11. Places the burden of proof on a DREAM Act applicant. An individual would be required to
demonstrate eligibility for the DREAM Act by a preponderance of the evidence.

http://bit.ly/id7iZ2