Quote:
Originally Posted by AL
I would argue that they don't have a good case on the matter, per se, stripping someone's naturalized citizenship is an unconstitutional act in itself. The only way they can get around this is to make two classes of citizenship something that has not been ruled unconstitutional, akin segregationist though. So this route is just a public display and not much would go on, is their money so I guess they can spend it however they want.
Trust me, immigration has burned America several times the Irish, the polish, the germans, and the italians, just kept coming and werent assimilating either. So yeah if you call that burn they were burn and most likely as history shows, would keep getting burn regardless of legislation.
|
Irish, Polish, Italians came here legally and received legal citzenship upon arrival, The people that are fighting birth rite citizenship are not creating two types of citizens that is unless you are a slave brought to this country by American and paid for. By the letter of the words in the 14th amendment that have not been changed it states if the mother of the child born in the US has jurisdiction from another country (illegal)than that child is under the jurisdiction of the mothers country's jurisdiction . It will be close but I believe that Hagan (d) supreme court justice has worked on a case like this on a different type of illegal immigration and will have to recluse herself from the case so it will be heard by a majority republican supreme court and the case is being presented by two good constitutional attorney's. So we will see what happens the court has several cases on immigration that are about be cleared up they rushed SB1070 up there from Arizona you can follow there cases and judgments on line/