Quote:
Originally Posted by dtrt09
If the Chicago DREAM Act comes to be, Emanuel's campaign said a Chicagoan must meet the following criteria:
* Moved to Chicago before the age of 16...
* Resided in Chicago for at least five consecutive years prior to application for DREAM Status.
* Be a student in good standing at an elementary or high school in Chicago - public, private or religious.
* Be between the ages of 12 and 25 at the time of application.
* Be a law-abiding Chicagoan.
This isn't for the state of Illinois - it is only for Chicagoans who would be able under this plan to attend college in Chicago. This is a new low for the Dems.
Wtf is this? Wtf is next? A neighborhood "DREAM" act so that you won't have to worry about attending public K12 in your area schools? Everyone is hijacking the actual DREAM act legislation; watering it down; applying in all manner of variations, except the one that counts: legalization. I see that he lowered the age to 25. I know he is no longer at the White House, but this is now the 4th variation of a proposed Dream that I've read with this cut-off age.
The DREAM Act is a legalization program; NOT a tuition plan. If you have status, the cost is the least of the issues because people will work three jobs if necessary; call it immigrant work ethic if you will. This is nothing but cynical pandering and I find it utterly disrespectful for him to expect people to buy his BS.
|
I'd have to agree with this guy. It is misleading to say that it's "Chicago's DREAM Act" and not really the entire state. Chicago is in Illinois, so the entire state should benefit from the DREAM Act, since there is an emerging hispanic/minority population in Illinois, just like Colorado.