Quote:
Originally Posted by kingsam73
FK this got me dam worried! I am a fairly recent dreamer because i only came here about 6 years ago at the age of 11. God dam it! I will jump off a cliff if the bill passes and i'll be disqualified for something stupid like this. Just keep it as it is for the original DA, which is "5 consecutive years of presence in the US" please! Lol, maybe i'm worrying too much because all this 'cutoff date' business is all the article author's thinking.
|
I'm sorry if we do that then the bill won't pass. Sorry, but thanks for your efforts.
Sound familiar? It made me upset to see you be so hypocritical now. Of course I want it to benefit you too, but realize what you were doing. Here is the actual thing you said I hope it helps in retrospect.
"You guys are ridiculous. Go ahead and advocate that we should include the DREAMers who are like 45 years old. But if the DA fails because of that, you'll be the ones getting stones thrown at for your stupidity of "all or nothing." If you really want to include the original DREAMers, you first need to boost DA's chances of passing in the first place. Then you need to prove to the Republicans why adding them would be a 'good idea.' Do you have any clue as to why they should be included, when as of now, they don't even have pity for people under 30? Heh.....that's just my opinion. By the way, most of the 'fighting' was done in the congress in politics. No DREAMer was a congressman who actually went and moved forward the cause [even though they mailed and rallied and all that stuff]."