I agree with Durbin but this is a STARS Act not a Dream Act that has a age limit to 19.
He knows about the original Dreamers that are in their 30s so it is only fair to put back to 35 and/or Retro.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cacheton011
If Rubio's imaginary bill is released this year and the age cap is reasonable (30 w/retro provision) and if the age requirement is 16 or younger for time of entry, I think we should embrace it. There's plenty of ways of obtaining a green card, all we need is to be LEGAL and be able to "get in back of the line". If Rubio's bill does not offer a path to residency, then we can always adjust through family, marriage or employer sponsorship.....let's wait and see.
|
30 with Retro is the most fair thing to do. It has been 15 or under though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilbawler2001
Rubio better take note if he is planning on changing any of the age requirements connected to the dream act. Dems will simply not support it IM0. Taking away the instate tuition and original path to citizenship is enough!!
|
In state tuition should not be a big concern anyway. CA and TX offer that right?