Quote:
Originally Posted by IamAman
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. If this EO goes as mentioned where the undocumented immigrants who had kids here gain status expressly because they had babies here then the term is 100% factual. Come on now, we're among each other so let's be honest. How can someone who came here 20 years ago and wore a condom be any less deserving than someone who came here 10 years ago and spread their seed around?
|
So if you marry a USC does that make them an anchor spouse? Also if he grants relief to the parents of DACA recipients does that make DACA recipients "anchors?" And what about that person who came 20 yrs and busted their hump and also brought their kids over, but their child got relief and not them, who is deserving then? This whole thing is only a patch for a broken system. All I'm saying is let's not engage in the same rhetoric.