Quote:
Originally Posted by pink
Yeah, I know... but if this conservative court rules in favor of Hanen and the case has to make its way to the supreme court, this is where the uncertainty lies. We will just have to cross that bridge if we get to it I guess. By the way the link you posted is from an article written in 2012. It is not related to DACA extension in any way.
|
Of course I know it was about 2012 - you wrote about the administrative procedure act, and the article is about notice and comment on the federal register for DACA in 2012.
DACA is an existing program. There are NOT
three deferred action programs: There's new guidelines to replace 2012 DACA ("Expanded DACA"), and there's DAPA.
Two deferred action programs. All press articles focus on DAPA, the 5th ct response focuses on DAPA, the whole issue is with DAPA, not the removing of the age cap and forwarding of the date of presence required for DACA.