Quote:
Originally Posted by IamAman
What percentage of law professionals are saying this? So far I hear only one or two who are again giving their opinion. As long as we're being conspiracy theorists, I'd say it's partially to drum up business and add traffic to their websites. Sure their opinions are based on their knowledge of the law, but then the people who say Obama is breaking the law by executive action (like Ted Cruz) are also lawyers so just the fact that they happen to be lawyers doesn't mean they are right one way or another.
And again you keep mentioning the 2012 DACA - that was already enacted so whatever they did for that after the fact doesn't mean that it would work for this particular case.
If tomorrow or a month from now Obama adds this to the federal register and all of a sudden the 5th circuit magically says "oh well, that's all we were waiting for Mr. President!" and Hanen comes out and says "That's all I ever wanted! Welcome to America old Dreamers and old parents!" I'll eat my words, but I think a lot of you armchair immigration lawyers and federal judges are simplifying this too much.
|
No one is saying this is a "conspiracy" - simply that publishing regulations would allow you to apply for DAPA or extended DACA while the litigation runs its course. It's an available option that people don't seem to want to take. Odd.