Originally Posted by vft1008

Which is why it's got a slim chance of passing. Something more realistic would have been to maintain all of the original DACA qualification standards plus 3 or more years of employment though an EAD (plus the health, English, and civics assessment/examination). That would be a good realistic baby step to start with and would start some momentum in the right direction.

Heck, I'm even for stricter standards (i.e. BA or BS degree, 4 years of employment via an EAD, working in technical or STEM-based field, etc.) if it means getting something passed to start that snowballing effect. Of course with the assumption that other DACA holders would maintain DACA benefits for sometime to allow them to meet the qualifications if they do not at the time of enacting the relief. Everything with immigration reform has been so black and white.... something's gotta give.