Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984
I respect your decision to disagree. Just to satisfy my curiousity, how was that sexist? You do know that men and women are biologically different, right? One of these is that women tend to be more emotional. Nothing sexist about that.
Sexist is when I went to a bar in San Francisco and was told by the bouncer that I have to pay a $20 cover while my girlfriend gets in for free. Mind you, this is in one of the most liberal cities, that values so called gender “equality”
Back on topic. We will be good.
|
I think the situation you mention is sexist as well. But arguing that men need to be creatures who are to show no emotion and women are just disposed to show emoton is inherently sexist as well. It's sexist because it perpetuates dangerous and incorrect stereotypes. Hillary Clinton was far from the perfect candidate but the idea of women being controlled by their emotions was utilized discredit her unfairly. Voters actually said that they didn't see a woman being able to become president because of this reasons even though there is little evidence to show that these stereotypes are true.