Originally Posted by tays123

Lets go to the Argument section
I. A. I agree, but it is irrelevant
I. B. Nope, it does not present a case for controversy.
I. C. They do not have standing. This was argued over and over and over again. Their argument is that they have to give us driver licenses and this is costing Texas - Texans extra money. That DACA is hurting the Texas's economy! That they have to pay higher health care and education costs because of DACA.
II. A. WRONG. DACA went through the proper steps. The only reason eDACA and DAPA did not hold was because they did not go through the proper steps.
II B. Their argument will not hold. Why? Look at II.B.2. They contradict themselves when they say " Even if DACA did pass Chevron's first step, it would not pass the second" when in II.B.1 they state " DACA does not pass Chevron's first step because..." This will not hold in any court.. .
Look at II.B.3 ... Again DAPA did not go through the proper steps like DACA did! How many times do I have to repeat that? And II.B.4 is laughable! There are many cases when the U.S. government gave procedural discretion...

So there! They do not bring on any new arguments.