• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

March

  »
S M T W T F S
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Immigration Reform Effort To Begin In Senate Post-Inauguration

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›
#1
11-08-2012, 02:38 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2012
109 posts
Dargwe
0 AP
i know we got already a few of this articles but this one is pretty cool too...

Quote:
WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats are planning to quickly revisit immigration reform after President Barack Obama's inauguration, according to several Democratic sources.

What type of legislation they will end up pushing has yet to be discussed in detail. But the party feels emboldened by Tuesday's election results, in which Republicans suffered a blistering defeat among Latinos. And there is a sense that the political landscape couldn't be more ripe for a legislative topic that's proved dicey in the past.

"I am optimistic," Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said of immigration reform at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast on Thursday morning. Schumer chairs the immigration subcommittee. "It is a little bit of a mirror image like the fiscal cliff. I think there are a large number of Republicans who understand that the anti-immigrant position, no immigration, we couldn't even pass a [worker visa] STEM bill through the House because the Republican caucus said you can't have a net increase in any immigrants."

A Democratic Senate source who spoke on condition of anonymity told The Huffington Post that the full push for reform won't happen immediately, but will begin soon after Obama starts his second term. The Dream Act, which would give legal status to undocumented young people who came to the U.S. as children, will be included in the efforts, according to the source.

"This isn't going to happen during lame duck," the source said.

The Obama administration has been a bit coy on what it views as its list of second-term priorities, with much of the early focus being spent on fiscal and tax policies that will take effect at the end of the year. But one close Obama advisor, not authorized to speak on the issue, said it made eminent political sense to try immigration reform at the top of the second term. And the president himself seemed to preview his intentions of doing just that during an interview with Univision late in his campaign, saying it was among his biggest failures.

"I can promise that I will try to do it in the first year of my second term. I want to try this year," Obama said in another Univision interview earlier in the campaign.

The election provided a referendum of sorts on the Republican party's immigration platform, and the results were close to pitiful. More than 70 percent of Latinos supported Obama over GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney. Polling found that a majority of Latinos were put off by Romney's rhetoric and legislative positions on immigration, particularly his opposition to the Dream Act and a deferred action policy by Obama that would impact the same undocumented young people.

That dynamic extends to congressional Republicans, who -- with the help of five Democrats -- killed the Dream Act in the Senate in 2010 and have blocked other immigration measures as well.

The hope among reform advocates is that Tuesday's results have dramatically changed the landscape. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Wednesday that immigration reform is "very high" on his list of post-election priorities, and that Republicans could block it at their own "peril."

Schumer said Senate Democrats "basically have the outlines" for immigration reform, which includes pressuring Republican members who previously showed support for visa measures to come back to the cause. Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) will be targeted in particular, Reid and Schumer said.

"I think [Republicans] are going to want to do it now," Schumer said. "[It] is at the top of the list because the nation demands it and needs it. And, again, I think in the exit polls, two-thirds of Americans basically agreed with the concept of real immigration reform."

He's right: Americans in general, even Republicans, support immigration reform more than the congressional GOP would suggest. Sixty-five percent of voters support giving undocumented immigrants working in the U.S. a path to legal status, including 37 percent of Republicans, according to exit polls. Other polling indicates that a majority of non-Latinos also support the Dream Act and its allowance for young undocumented immigrants to eventually earn citizenship.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) planned earlier this year to introduce a Dream Act-lite that would allow some undocumented young people to gain legal status, but not citizenship. He dropped those plans after Obama's deferred action directive, but some have called for him to take up the effort again, and he will likely be a leader among the Republicans on immigration reform. Alex Conant, his spokesman, declined to comment on Rubio's plans on the issue.

Some have also called for Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) to rejoin the effort for legislation to help undocumented youth. Hatch was an original co-sponsor of the Dream Act with Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) in 2001, but voted against it in its most recent iteration. Hatch spokeswoman Antonia Ferrier said "he'd be happy to listen to his colleagues" on immigration reform, but will keep his focus on economic issues as the lead Republican on the Senate Finance Committee.

McCain's office did not respond to a request for comment on how, or if, he will be involved.

Another Democratic Senate source, who also spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss planning, said they hope to have Republicans put forward their own plan so there can be a debate over whether immigration reform should include pathways to citizenship, for example. The source added that the Democratic plan would likely be similar to the broad bill put forward this session.

"The thinking has been done about what are the different elements that are going to be included in a bill, and now it's just a question of what Republicans are going to agree to," the source said.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_2093178.html
__________________
DACA Application sent 08/20/2012 to Dallas Lockbox via Express; delivered 08/21/2012.
Application received and notified on :8/24/2012
Biometrics scheduled on 9/20/12 did a walk in on 9.12.12
Application approved on 9.24.12 - EAD received on 9.28.12
Drivers licence: 9.28.12 SSN:
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Dargwe
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dargwe
Find all posts by Dargwe
#2
11-08-2012, 02:43 PM
Senior Member
From Connecticut
Joined in Mar 2009
8,670 posts
2Face's Avatar
2Face
0 AP
Well the usual suspects have been mentioned...Schumer, McCain, Hatch but the main GOP man who I feel will bring his party to the table is the Senior Senator from South Carolina LINDSEY GRAHAM. He is the most genuine GOP Senator I've encountered with immigration policy. He is one I would trust to make a compromise. Not too sure about McCain and Hatch. Schumer and Graham should introduce the next CIR bill!!! Whatever happens, I expect a clear pathway to a conditional green card for DACA beneficiaries and some sort of guest worker program for the remaining undocumented immigrants. Hopefully there will be a pathway to permanent residency for everybody! I am very very excited for next year. Obama doesn't have to worry about reelection. GOP is on the ropes and on track to lose the 2016 election as well. Hispanics have been mentioned REPEATEDLY by Republican strategists/networks as a heavy influence on Obamas victory. Now..only God help us from the wrath of the great Senator from Alabama, JEFF SESSIONS!!
Last edited by 2Face; 11-08-2012 at 02:47 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
2Face
View Public Profile
Send a private message to 2Face
Find all posts by 2Face
#3
11-08-2012, 02:49 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
^I think on the Republican side things might be a bit different in the Senate.I think the new Senator, Jeff Flake,will play a key role in the Upper Chamber with regards to any negotiation since he was a former House Republican before and might be the best man for the job.

I think Democrats in the Senate are actually waiting for the Republican alternative and see where it goes.
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
Last edited by Ianus; 11-08-2012 at 02:53 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#4
11-08-2012, 04:37 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2006
1,206 posts
rock steady
80 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ianus View Post
^I think on the Republican side things might be a bit different in the Senate.I think the new Senator, Jeff Flake,will play a key role in the Upper Chamber with regards to any negotiation since he was a former House Republican before and might be the best man for the job.

I think Democrats in the Senate are actually waiting for the Republican alternative and see where it goes.
Flake used to be a solid supporter of immigration reform, but he moved to the right in his Senate primary. Let's hope he comes back to his senses!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
rock steady
View Public Profile
Send a private message to rock steady
Find all posts by rock steady
#5
11-08-2012, 05:40 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jul 2012
858 posts
kabs
0 AP
I'm more worried about the House. Senate will be fine because they see the big picture. House caters to the election cycle and will care about their position/electability, not the future.
__________________
Application Sent - 08/21/2012 to Chicago, Delivered - 8/22/2012
Date of I-797 C Notice of Action - 8/24/2012, 8/30/2012 Letter
Date of Biometrics Appointment - 9/26/2012
Routed to: Vermont, Location: NJ
APPROVED: November 5, 2012
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
kabs
View Public Profile
Send a private message to kabs
Find all posts by kabs
#6
11-08-2012, 06:47 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
So it is going to be a GOP Bill. This means it will definately pass in the House.

I can see CIR/DA passing in February 2013.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#7
11-08-2012, 07:25 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2007
279 posts
skysla
20 AP
Now, I can see the political dynamics has shifted in favor of the Democrats...
The Democrats have an upper hand on the so-called "fiscal cliff" negotiations. In addition to that, the Republicans want to do something about immigration to stop any more Hispanic voters moving to the Democrats...

Although the birthright plan that the Republicans are having is unlikely to become reality due to the complexity involved in the process, it is good to see that the Republicans are alarmed.

At least, for President Obama's second term, there won't be as many issues bigger than immigration as during his first term. For the past four years, immigration was pushed off due to the economy, the health care reform, the budget/tax bills, the financial reform, etc. And, now, the Republican leadership is alarmed by the fact that more than 70% of the Hispanic vote went to the Democrats.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
skysla
View Public Profile
Send a private message to skysla
Find all posts by skysla
#8
11-08-2012, 07:41 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
653 posts
chlehqls's Avatar
chlehqls
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by skysla View Post
Now, I can see the political dynamics has shifted in favor of the Democrats...
The Democrats have an upper hand on the so-called "fiscal cliff" negotiations. In addition to that, the Republicans want to do something about immigration to stop any more Hispanic voters moving to the Democrats...

Although the birthright plan that the Republicans are having is unlikely to become reality due to the complexity involved in the process, it is good to see that the Republicans are alarmed.

At least, for President Obama's second term, there won't be as many issues bigger than immigration as during his first term. For the past four years, immigration was pushed off due to the economy, the health care reform, the budget/tax bills, the financial reform, etc. And, now, the Republican leadership is alarmed by the fact that more than 70% of the Hispanic vote went to the Democrats.
Exactly this.

There are some naysayers on this forum that claim nothing will change in the next 2 years, but I guarantee there will be something down the pipeline. Both parties now fully recognize how important the "minority" vote is, especially Hispanics and this was more or less a rude wake-up call for the current GOP establishment. There's going to be a lot of talks of getting something done and not just merely lip-service either.

One good thing about this election? That the Democratic Senate managed to keep a majority when it shouldn't have (See Mourdock and Akin back when both were leading their Democrat rivals before the rape comments) and the political momentum is shifting in favor of the Democrats despite the obstructionist House.

Things are going to get very interesting next year.
__________________
Biometrics done: 09/13/12
Approved: 10/19/12
EAD card received: 10/23/12
Driver's Permit: 11/16/12
Driver's License: 12/08/12
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
chlehqls
View Public Profile
Send a private message to chlehqls
Find all posts by chlehqls
#9
11-08-2012, 08:56 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
5,714 posts
IamAman's Avatar
IamAman
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by kabs View Post
I'm more worried about the House. Senate will be fine because they see the big picture. House caters to the election cycle and will care about their position/electability, not the future.
Yeah the house is fully of teabaggers. The will grandstand and kill it and then blame the Democrats for not passing immigration.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
IamAman
View Public Profile
Send a private message to IamAman
Find all posts by IamAman
#10
11-08-2012, 09:50 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2011
7,552 posts
Smooth's Avatar
Smooth
0 AP
I hope something really good happens. Fingers crossed.
__________________
#Lawgic
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Smooth
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Smooth
Find all posts by Smooth
  • 1
  • 2
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.