Good DREAM Act Debate - MSNBC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCsldlO7198&feature=sub

I enjoyed it.

Although, the guy supporting us could have highlighted the fact that we CANNOT immediately sponsor family relatives.

They are going to ride that age thing hard. An @ 2:31 the news flash things says citizenship after 2 years of military service, i thought it was 6 years conditional no matter which path and then Permanent residency?

Don't believe anything that is skewed like that. Obviously, we would only attain PR AFTER we complete the 6 years, NOT citizenship.

Once we attain PR, we can apply for citizenship. Of course, that would also take time (years, even).

It's a very long process, yet certain opponents attempt to trick viewers into believing that it's a fast process.

msnbc should fact check then, they got it right for the college thing sayind 2 years leads to citizenship but with the military thing they said 2 years and then citizenship.

Uhm it makes me wonder why they dont pass the DA if they are gettin 9,000 in taxes per dreamer. For once it's not about money?

The cis guy should pull his head out of his ass, none of the things he said were even close to being true.

why the video said 15 year old or early to come to US? did they change the limited to 15 or early? i though they only change from 35 to 30 right?

I think it means anything before 16; e.g. 15 and 11 months.

The DA wording states that the person must have come here BEFORE turning 16. Therefore, the person could only be 15 and younger.

bad part from MSNBC, you NEVER get on your show an animal that made his living deporting people. their not kids? well not anymore numbskull; but they came as kids regardless.

he talks about rewarding 1.1 million green-cards a year. now let me ask, who went through more hell for that green card? us or the ones who signed a little document, married someone for papers, or paid to get sponsored by an employee?...

Bad reporting also by the other guy, when he was asked "theres no way they would be checked".. he could've said "check your little h/s record and you will see their attendance there.

about sponsoring the family part; there's some that has to be done about that, but if you do become a citizen; all citizens are equal, thus you are allowed to the same rights. If there is something to be done about that provision; then let it be.

that ex-INS worker is the same animal that was on the Lawrence O'Donnell "Immigration: A town-hall event" last week.

And whats with the "criminals can apply too".. excuse me, these morons don't understand that the same "moral character" requirement is the same as the one in the current immigration law for arriving legal immigrants. It never said don't have a criminal record, it says that not all crimes show intent, some are just crimes of poor judgment (not habitual ofcourse); and thus they cannot render someone a "bad person"...

EVERYONE who goes on these lame shows should bring a copy of the bill with them and show it zoomed in the camera so these animals can see it.

my birth is 10/31/1986 is it qualify??and i came here 7/2002, damn i joined this forum since 2007 and inow i am worry about qualify or not. damn