• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Bipartisan House immigration group reports ‘incredible progress’

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
02-23-2013, 01:01 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/28...dible-progress
Quote:
A bipartisan House group is making “really good progress” on immigration reform legislation despite missing a target date for an agreement, a top Republican participant said.

“I am now more sure than ever that we’re going to have a bipartisan bill,” a longtime advocate of comprehensive reform, Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.), said in an interview. “We’re making incredible progress.”

Diaz-Balart is a member of a House group that includes more than a half dozen liberal and conservative lawmakers who have been working for years behind closed doors on an immigration overhaul. As talks accelerated in recent months, people involved in the effort said the group had hoped to announce an agreement around President Obama’s State of the Union address.

That date came and went, and now aides say that while the talks are ongoing, participants are not setting a deadline or target date for releasing legislation.

“There is no timetable. There is no target. There is no expiration date,” a House Democratic aide said.

Diaz-Balart said that the group hoped to unveil a bill soon but, as would be expected with any sensitive effort of this magnitude, lawmakers do not want to go public prematurely. Members are also wary of setting target dates out of the fear that if they are missed, it will send a signal that talks have stalled.

Diaz Balart would not discuss details of the group’s deliberations but said there are “still a couple of sticking points.”

A light legislative schedule in Washington has slowed face-to-face meetings of the group in recent weeks, but the hope is that the pace will quicken when the House is in session more frequently in March.


Lawmakers know the rollout of an immigration bill can be nearly as important as the substance and are trying to draw lessons from the failed push to overhaul the immigration system in 2006 and 2007.

One major takeaway, according to one veteran of that era, is that once a bill is introduced, it has to move quickly, because delay will allow critics to chip away at the proposal and unnerve the fragile coalition holding it together in Congress.

“The longer there is between the time you unveil the proposal and the time you vote on the proposal, the greater the likelihood that it will wind up not making it all the way through to passage,” said a former senior Bush administration official deeply involved in that effort. “Once you’ve got this thing baked, you’ve got to get it out of the oven and into the refrigerator and start eating it pretty quickly. Because if you let it sit on the table — I’m going to beat the metaphor to death — the ants will start eating the cake up.”


While a bipartisan coalition of eight senators released a set of agreed-upon principles in advance of legislation, the House group is working on legislative language in hopes of presenting a completed bill. Members of the Senate group have said they are hoping to unveil legislation in March.

The path to immigration reform is far more complicated in the lower chamber, where the Republican majority is dominated by conservatives who have long resisted a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) is supporting the bipartisan group’s effort but has not committed to backing the legislation it produces.

On the House Judiciary Committee, which holds jurisdiction over immigration, Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and other senior Republicans have voiced opposition to a path to citizenship that Democrats view as essential.

Some Democrats involved in the immigration push also raised concerns after Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), the second-ranking Republican, delivered a policy speech in which he endorsed a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrant students brought to the U.S. as children but was silent on broader immigration reform. Democrats say that issue, which is the central tenet of the Dream Act, is essentially “yesterday’s news” and wondered whether Republican leaders were sending mixed signals.

Diaz Balart said he heard those concerns from Democrats and brought them up with party leaders. “We’ve had those conversations with leadership,” he said. “I am not concerned about leadership’s willingness to support immigration reform.” He cautioned, however, that the leadership had not committed specifically to backing the legislation the bipartisan group produced.

Not all Democrats viewed Cantor’s speech as a setback; some lawmakers and aides saw his endorsement of policy resembling the Dream Act as a sign of progress, since he had previously opposed the legislation. The majority leader also released a statement Thursday praising an agreement between labor and business on principles related to low-skilled immigration, which was seen as a key advancement for the broader reform effort.


The Democratic members of the House immigration group – Reps. Luis Gutierrez (Ill.), Xavier Becerra (Calif.) and Zoe Lofgren (Calif.) — were unavailable for interviews, but aides backed up Diaz-Balart’s status report.

“If he’s optimistic, I would be optimistic,” one Democratic aide said.

Republicans say the bigger hurdle to reform is not their own leadership but President Obama. GOP lawmakers were angered by the leak last weekend of draft legislation the White House is preparing in case the effort in Congress stalls. The development deepened the suspicion held by Republicans that Obama wants to use the immigration issue as a political cudgel in 2014 more than he wants an actual bill to sign.

Diaz-Balart said the House and Senate would pass immigration reform despite the president, not because of him.

“I am absolutely sure he doesn’t want to get it done. But it doesn’t matter,” he said of Obama. “He’s not going to torpedo it.”
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#2
02-23-2013, 01:05 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
Great News and I predict CIR will pass in March
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#3
02-23-2013, 01:17 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2010
1,675 posts
TexasDreamy
0 AP
Quote:
"A little talked about provision of the proposed immigration bill is a large cannon with a human-sized bore," said Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.) in an interview. "It will be used to deport illegals across the border in a highly expedient manner."
You know it~
__________________
Renewal 3: Card: Jun/19
Awaiting GC/USC...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
TexasDreamy
View Public Profile
Send a private message to TexasDreamy
Find all posts by TexasDreamy
#4
02-23-2013, 01:26 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Feb 2012
858 posts
danieltij
0 AP
This just in: DA User has changed his prediction to next month
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
danieltij
View Public Profile
Send a private message to danieltij
Find all posts by danieltij
#5
02-23-2013, 01:47 PM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
Incredible is incredible
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sonawabich
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sonawabich
#6
02-23-2013, 03:05 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianoswithoutfaith View Post
Great News and I predict CIR will pass in March
Great news. I predict CIR/DA will pass next month.

Quote:
Originally Posted by danieltij View Post
This just in: DA User has changed his prediction to next month
I predict CIR will incredibly pass next month.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#7
02-23-2013, 04:34 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2012
856 posts
Severity
0 AP
There is an expiration date... idiot. Get your asses up and start working. As always politicians rather talk the talk than walk the walk
__________________
Mailing Method Certified
Date Received - 08/30/2012
i797c letter- 09/07/2012
Biometrics- 10/02/2012
Approved- 11/26/2012
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Severity
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Severity
Find all posts by Severity
#8
02-23-2013, 05:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2009
520 posts
bigdreamer2010
0 AP
Quote:
Diaz-Balart said the House and Senate would pass immigration reform despite the president, not because of him.
That's what we want to hear... They don't want to give Obama the credit, but he'll end up getting it any way
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
bigdreamer2010
View Public Profile
Send a private message to bigdreamer2010
Find all posts by bigdreamer2010
#9
02-23-2013, 05:08 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,110 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Severity View Post
There is an expiration date... idiot. Get your asses up and start working. As always politicians rather talk the talk than walk the walk
+1 - Time passing by is the expiration. What a stupidly clueless statement. Ask anyone who aged out of the Dream Act or their family's petition.

Also, in the same principle "childhood arrivals" are those who arrived as children and as such there shouldn't be an "expiratin date" aka, upper age limit to beneficiaries. If you came here at 10, you're okay to stay if youre 35, but not 36? Childhood spent here means you formed your identity here and should be allowed to have a path to citizenship.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#10
02-23-2013, 08:37 PM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
5,991 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
"...there is no target..."

Yes there is, the target is fixing this crap.
__________________
LPR these days
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.