• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

April

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Do Republicans want immigration reform?

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
06-05-2013, 02:10 PM
Moderator
From Atlanta, GA
Joined in Aug 2008
2,822 posts
freshh.'s Avatar
freshh.
250 AP
Quote:
The story on immigration reform remains very simple: Republicans, at some point, will have to decide whether they want it to pass or not. Not whether they’ll vote for it — most of them won’t. But Democrats are happy to supply the bulk of the votes on this one, so all that matters is whether Republicans choose to let them or not.

That comes up again with Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), one of the Gang of Eight who drafted the Senate bill, suddenly announcing he will walk if border security amendments that would unravel the compromise legislation are not adopted in the full Senate:
Well, I think if those amendments don’t pass, then I think we’ve got a bill that isn’t going to become law, and I think we’re wasting our time. So the answer is no.
As Ed Kilgore notes, the story here appears to be all about Rubio’s presidential ambitions, with support for comprehensive immigration reform potentially spiking
Rubio’s shot at the Republican nomination.

Meanwhile, over in the House, Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) says that it’s “highly unlikely” that anything with a path to citizenship can win more than half of House Republicans, as Sahil Kapur reports.

Does that mean that immigration reform is dead? No, it doesn’t.

Again: Immigration reform doesn’t need all that many votes from Republicans. Without Rubio, it probably has only about 60 in the Senate, instead of about 75 — but 60 is all it needs, and if Republicans really want it to pass it doesn’t even need that many. Remember, the bill had the support of every Democrat in Judiciary plus two “Gang of Eight” Republicans, Jeff Flake and Lindsey Graham, and also got the vote of Orrin Hatch. Losing Rubio could still leave the bill likely to retain the support of more than half a dozen Republicans, along with almost every Democrat.

As for the House, it’s no surprise that most Republicans will oppose the bill if it gets to the floor; the real question has been from the start whether Speaker John Boehner would bring it up, not whether it has the votes if he does.


What Rubio’s apparent defection could mean is that the vote in the Senate will be a lot less overwhelming. But that only really matters to the extent that it puts pressure on the House. And what really matters in the House probably isn’t media pressure, but the basic calculation by mainstream conservatives about whether passing a bill is better than not passing a bill.

And the truth is that there’s really no other way. The reality has always been that a lot of Republicans would not vote for any kind of path to citizenship at all, so Democrats were always going to have to supply the bulk of the votes for any imaginable version of comprehensive immigration reform.

In other words, what it all comes down to is that Republicans have to make a choice. If they want to spike comprehensive immigration reform — perhaps because they fear anti-immigrant voters in primaries, perhaps because they fear newly (eventually) enfranchised immigrant voters — they can do that, simply by not bringing up the bill in the House. If they want to pass the bill — perhaps because they fear angering large numbers of Latino and other immigrant or immigrant-sympathetic voters — they can do that, too; for the most part, all they’ll need to do is get out of the way.


We still have no idea which they will do. But once again, it’s probably safe to ignore all the rhetoric (and, ultimately, even the votes) that they throw to one side or the other. What this is all going to come down to is a choice: Bring a bill to the House floor, or not. And Boehner will do it if the bulk of his caucus wants him to do it — even if they also plan to vote against it and to denounce him publicly for doing so. If, however, they really want the bill to die, then it will die.

So while there may be any number of relatively small provisions that can be negotiated, what it’s all going to come down to is the choice that Republicans make.

And for that, we’ll just have to wait and see.
Source
__________________
Self-Prepared, Jamaican, Visa Overstay ; Expiration: 10.18.18
Renewal #3 Sent: 01.21.18 (Chicago, IL)| Arrived: 01.23.2018
G-1145:01.26.18|Biometrics Received: 01.30.18 (02.16.18 ) | Biometrics Completed : 02.16.18
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
freshh.
View Public Profile
Send a private message to freshh.
Find all posts by freshh.
#2
06-05-2013, 05:31 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2013
294 posts
EditorInChief
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by freshh. View Post
Source
I would ask the opposite question: Do DEMOCRATS want immigration reform?

All previous CIR reforms were done by the Republicans: Either bill passing one of the two chambers or bill becoming law.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
EditorInChief
View Public Profile
Send a private message to EditorInChief
Find all posts by EditorInChief
#3
06-05-2013, 05:41 PM
Moderator
From Atlanta, GA
Joined in Aug 2008
2,822 posts
freshh.'s Avatar
freshh.
250 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by EditorInChief View Post
I would ask the opposite question: Do DEMOCRATS want immigration reform?

All previous CIR reforms were done by the Republicans: Either bill passing one of the two chambers or bill becoming law.
In this case, I can tell you that they'll be happy whether it passes or it fails. Imagine the field day they will have if it fails. They'll laugh the Republicans out of the White House for the next 5 election cycles. But, if it passes, they will be the champions of Immigrants for generations to come.

I probably exaggerated a bit, but you get what I mean.
__________________
Self-Prepared, Jamaican, Visa Overstay ; Expiration: 10.18.18
Renewal #3 Sent: 01.21.18 (Chicago, IL)| Arrived: 01.23.2018
G-1145:01.26.18|Biometrics Received: 01.30.18 (02.16.18 ) | Biometrics Completed : 02.16.18
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
freshh.
View Public Profile
Send a private message to freshh.
Find all posts by freshh.
#4
06-05-2013, 07:37 PM
BANNED
Joined in Oct 2012
2,487 posts
Happyman0607
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by freshh. View Post
In this case, I can tell you that they'll be happy whether it passes or it fails. Imagine the field day they will have if it fails. They'll laugh the Republicans out of the White House for the next 5 election cycles. But, if it passes, they will be the champions of Immigrants for generations to come.

I probably exaggerated a bit, but you get what I mean.
Exaggerated or not, I know in the future when I become a citizen, a republican will never have my vote. I'll gladly vote for any and every democrat candidate
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Happyman0607
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Happyman0607
#5
06-05-2013, 08:26 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2013
294 posts
EditorInChief
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by freshh. View Post
In this case, I can tell you that they'll be happy whether it passes or it fails. Imagine the field day they will have if it fails. They'll laugh the Republicans out of the White House for the next 5 election cycles. But, if it passes, they will be the champions of Immigrants for generations to come.

I probably exaggerated a bit, but you get what I mean.

I kind of think this country is going down as the Democratic party is gradually becoming the dictatorship party.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
EditorInChief
View Public Profile
Send a private message to EditorInChief
Find all posts by EditorInChief
#6
06-05-2013, 08:30 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2013
294 posts
EditorInChief
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happyman0607 View Post
Exaggerated or not, I know in the future when I become a citizen, a republican will never have my vote. I'll gladly vote for any and every democrat candidate

I would look at their policy and evaluate it under the environment.

Immigration is one thing, but it is NOT everything.

I do not want to become the citizen of a country that is collapsing. Given that the country is going bankrupt, its passport/citizenship is becoming trash.

So, my vote would go to those who could make the country better and go to those who could help me earn more money.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
EditorInChief
View Public Profile
Send a private message to EditorInChief
Find all posts by EditorInChief
#7
06-05-2013, 08:39 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Jun 2007
2,690 posts
CIR_DREAM2009
210 AP
Call the Republicans' bluff. If they ever want to see the inside of the White House again, they'll allow immigration reform to go through.
__________________
EAD/DACA Renewal: 10/8/2014
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
CIR_DREAM2009
View Public Profile
Send a private message to CIR_DREAM2009
Find all posts by CIR_DREAM2009


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.