Do Polls Foreshadow Republican Destruction in the Senate?

cacheton011 · 10-14-2013, 08:54 AM

http://wallstcheatsheet.com

This may be true for the House too....

Quote:

With Washington at a standstill during the shutdown and panic over the debt ceiling building, frustration has a clear place in political sentiment these days. Polls have also made it obvious that a lot of this frustration is pointed at Republicans in Washington. However, a new poll conducted by The Wall Street Journal and NBC is showing a whole new level of anger at the American government — unfortunately for those Republicans dreaming of the Senate, the findings are a real nightmare for the GOP.

According to The Washington Post, the poll was c0-administered by Republican pollster Bill McInturff and Democratic Pollsters Peter Hart and Fred Yang. McInturff said in an analysis of the poll that “this is among the handful of surveys that stand out in my career as being significant and consequential.”

Eight out of ten people polled said that the U.S. has veered off track — an increase of 16 percent in four months — and four in ten reported a belief that the economy is headed for a downturn this coming year. A record level of six in ten said that, if given the chance, they would swap out every single member of Congress — even their own.

Six out of ten voiced concern over the future of the economy as a result of events in Congress. A reported 24 percent of those polled had positive sentiments regarding the Republican party and 21 percent felt positive regarding the Tea Party.

Finally, the blame game — 53 percent blamed Republicans for the shutdown, 31 percent blamed President Obama, with 66.6 percent believing Republicans put their agenda before the best interest of the U.S., and 51 percent saying the same of Obama. A poll done by Gallup shows comparable results indicating dissatisfaction with the country as a whole, but especially Republicans.

Many may recall Senator Ted Cruz’s (R-Tex.) insistence last week — when poll numbers were slightly less severe, though still not good — that his party had “not remotely” been injured. Cruz had similar things to say recently when he told NBC News on Friday that its poll was “not reflective of where the country is.”

Electoral implications of general sentiment are hard to miss — Republicans previously hopeful of a Republican controlled Senate now have a difficult PR job ahead. Opinion of those in control of one housedoesn’t bode well for gaining a majority in the other.

Efforts on the part of Tea Party members have been viewed as particularly destructive — for example, the twenty-one-hour anti-health-care-law filibuster (which wasn’t a proper filibuster) conducted recently by Senator Cruz. According to The New York Times, Brian Walsh — Republican consultant and previous strategist for the National Republican Senatorial Committee — spoke with concern about groups within the Tea Party.

Walsh noted the divisive effect of those aiming the force of their political zeal inwards towards their own party. “The Tea Party benefits when the energy is focused on the Democratic Party and their agenda,” said Walsh, adding that the effect of a select few focusing on the Republican party has been “not helpful.”

House members currently running for Senate in Georgia, Louisiana, and Montana may be examples of what Walsh is talking about as they continue to demand revision of ObamaCare in exchange for ending the shutdown. Based on recent polls, voters may not have the patience at present for rhetoric of that sort.

Some, such as Senator Mitch McConnell, have adopted a different strategy: empathizing with voters frustration, said The New York Times. “Angry with Washington? So am I,” said McConnell, possibly hoping that if nothing else, Americans can rally behind that sentiment with equal enthusiasm.

Charlie Cook, editor of The Cook Political Report, described the Republicans’ path to Senate majority as “very, very, very narrow,” adding that if he were running for the U.S. Senate, he certainly wouldn’t want to be running “from Washington” or “from the House Republican side” at the same time. Analysis by Cook Political concluded that while Democrats would need only two of six competitive seats to retain the majority, five of those six would be need by Republicans, “including unseating 3 Democrats.”

Strategy for Republican candidates varies, according to The New York Times. Some, such as Republican Karen Handel, are distancing themselves from Washington. Others are standing firm on their anti-health-care positions. Candidate Representative Jack Kingston (R-Ga.) said that he would back up conservative colleagues in attacking ObamaCare even if he weren’t aiming for a seat in the Senate.

Republican maneuverings aside, Democratic candidates are certainly sitting easy under present conditions — assuming they last till the coming Senatorial elections.

leo86 · 10-15-2013, 02:02 PM

As much as I wish them to be slaughtered in the next House elections, the Tea Party Republicans are relatively safe due to gerrymandering.

The only scenario that I can see happening that could alter the stalemate would be if the Establishment Republicans decided they had enough of the Tea Party ruining their Republican Brand. Then, they would go on to publicly denounce the Tea Party Movement and sponsor pro business heavyweight contenders in the Tea Partiers' home districts. They wouldn't be able to get them all. However, they would get just enough seats as to render the Tea Party movement completely irrelevant again.

S	M	T	W	T	F	S
					1	2
3	4	5	6	7	8	9
10	11	12	13	14	15	16
17	18	19	20	21	22	23
24	25	26	27	28	29	30
31

They need you!

Forum links

Resources

Join our list

National calendar of events

August

Do Polls Foreshadow Republican Destruction in the Senate?