• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Defense bill amendment sets up immigration fight

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
#1
05-11-2016, 05:23 PM
Senior Member
Joined in May 2006
6,569 posts
Ianus's Avatar
Ianus
0 AP
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/27...igration-fight
Quote:
An annual defense policy bill is once again becoming embroiled in the debate over immigration.

Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) filed an amendment to the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that would strip out and replace language affirming the Defense secretary's ability to enlist anyone who is determined to be "vital to the national interest."

That would leave the door open to enlisting illegal immigrants if the person in question has an employment authorization issued under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

The language was added to the bill as an amendment during the House Armed Services Committee’s markup last month.

It was a substitute amendment offered by committee Chairman Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) after Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) introduced an amendment that would have directed the Defense secretary to establish a process under which people with legal status under President Obama's executive actions on immigratino could be enlisted.


Those people include children who came to or stayed in the United States illegally.



Thornberry’s amendment was adopted by the committee with a voice vote.

In place of that amendment, Gosar would put an amendment that says the Defense secretary can only enlist immigrants who are in the country legally as defined by the Immigration and Nationality Act.

That means those who fall under under Obama's executive orders would be excluded.

In a written statement, Gosar called the existing language “backdoor amnesty.”

“NDAA should be about providing critical funding for our troops, not debating immigration policy,” Gosar said. “Sadly, open border advocates have once again put politics ahead of the needs of our men and women in uniform in attempting to enact President Obama’s lawless agenda.”

In his own written statement, Gallego stressed that the language was a compromise offered by a Republican.

“This shouldn’t be a controversial issue,” he said. “This amendment is about defense and what is in the best interest of our nation and our military. I fought in Iraq, and I know that on the battlefield what matters is the character and commitment of the people you serve with, not their immigration status.”

A similar debate played out during the House debate on the NDAA last year.

The House ultimately voted to strip out a provision that would have established a sense of the House that the Pentagon should review allowing those affected by Obama's orders to enlist.

This year’s bill is expected to come to the House floor next week.
This should be interesting
__________________
We shall win our Dream!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Ianus
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Ianus
Find all posts by Ianus
#2
05-11-2016, 05:43 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Nov 2012
15,081 posts
Pianoswithoutfaith's Avatar
Pianoswithoutfaith
30 AP
I don't see it happening
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I personally knew that if he wins he's not going to be touching DACA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Face View Post
I hope Trump wins second term.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BestBefore1984 View Post
Tranny is not derogatory term dummy
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Pianoswithoutfaith
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Pianoswithoutfaith
Find all posts by Pianoswithoutfaith
#3
05-11-2016, 06:51 PM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
5,989 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
Oh for fuck's sake. Those assholes can attach a rider whenever they feel like, what about democrats? Slip the Dream Act in a committee? Can't do, give it to the full fucking senate to filibuster time after time again...
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
#4
05-11-2016, 07:24 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
2,652 posts
dado123
0 AP
can someone put this is in regular English, are they voting to allow daca holders to join the military and earn citizenship in this manner?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dado123
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dado123
Find all posts by dado123
#5
05-11-2016, 07:57 PM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
5,989 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
can someone put this is in regular English, are they voting to allow daca holders to join the military and earn citizenship in this manner?
Whoever wrote this article needs to go back to kindergarten.
Last edited by Demise; 05-11-2016 at 08:02 PM..
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
#6
05-11-2016, 09:57 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2013
275 posts
EdoIsa
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by dado123 View Post
can someone put this is in regular English, are they voting to allow daca holders to join the military and earn citizenship in this manner?
I think so
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
EdoIsa
View Public Profile
Send a private message to EdoIsa
Find all posts by EdoIsa
#7
05-12-2016, 02:11 AM
BANNED
Joined in Feb 2015
2,064 posts
DACA-IR-DA
0 AP
What about the eDACA?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DACA-IR-DA
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DACA-IR-DA
#8
05-12-2016, 07:49 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Dec 2010
137 posts
zeomax's Avatar
zeomax
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DACA-IR-DA View Post
What about the eDACA?
Anyone under DACA. That encompasses eDaca.
__________________
Application Sent: 8/22/12 via USPS Express
Application Delivered: 8/23/12 Signed by JC
Email and Text Received: 8/28/12 at 11:29am
Notice of Action Letter: 8/31/12
Biometrics Appointment: 9/28/12 Walk In: 9/18/12 EAD Approved 9/28/12
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
zeomax
View Public Profile
Send a private message to zeomax
Find all posts by zeomax
#9
05-13-2016, 01:16 AM
BANNED
Joined in Feb 2015
2,064 posts
DACA-IR-DA
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeomax View Post
Anyone under DACA. That encompasses eDaca.
People who are undocumented who would qualify for eDACA can get a permit from this bill?
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DACA-IR-DA
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DACA-IR-DA
#10
05-13-2016, 09:19 AM
Senior Member
From Minnesota
Joined in Nov 2009
5,989 posts
Demise's Avatar
Demise
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by DACA-IR-DA View Post
People who are undocumented who would qualify for eDACA can get a permit from this bill?
I honestly doubt you'd pass the ASVAB.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Demise
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Demise
Find all posts by Demise
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.