Judge blocks Trump administration from denying asylum claims to immigrants who cross

In an order laced with language accusing President Donald Trump of attempting to rewrite immigration laws, a federal judge based in San Francisco temporarily blocked the government late Monday night from denying asylum to thoThe Department of Homeland Security and Justice Department slammed the ruling and the lawsuit, calling them both "absurd."

"Our asylum system is broken, and it is being abused by tens of thousands of meritless claims every year. ... It is absurd that a set of advocacy groups can be found to have standing to sue to stop the entire federal government from acting so that illegal aliens can receive a government benefit to which they are not entitled," Homeland Security spokeswoman Katie Waldeman and Justice Department spokesman Steven Stafford said in a statement.

The temporary restraining order is effective nationwide and will remain in effect until December 19, when the judge has scheduled another hearing, or further order of the court.

The order is the latest setback for the administration that has sought to crack down on what it says are flaws in the immigration system, and it is a victory for the American Civil Liberties Union, the Southern Poverty Law Center and other groups who argued it is illegal to block someone based on how they entered the country.

Now a key question looms: What impact will the judge's decision have in the coming days at the US-Mexico border, where Trump has deployed thousands of troops as large groups of migrants seeking asylum head toward the United States?

More than 2,000 Central American migrants arrived in the border city of Tijuana in recent days, and about 3,000 more migrants are estimated to be in Mexicali, Mexico, another border city about 100 miles away, UN High Commissioner for Refugees spokeswoman Francesca Fontanini said.

In recent days, administration officials have maintained that there is a crisis at the border and that abuses in asylum claims forced them implement new measures.

Immigrant rights groups, who argue the administration is creating a crisis at the border to score political points, praised the judge's ruling.

"This is a critical step in fighting back against President Trump's war on asylum seekers," said Melissa Crow, senior supervising attorney at the Southern Poverty Law Center.

In their lawsuit, immigrants advocates argued it was illegal to block someone from seeking asylum based on how they entered the country, and that the Trump administration also violated the Administrative Procedure Act by not providing public notice or comment on its new asylum rule.

"This ban is illegal, will put people's lives in danger and raises the alarm about President Trump's disregard for separation of powers," said Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU's Immigrant Rights Project and the lead attorney in the case.

"There is no justifiable reason to flatly deny people the right to apply for asylum, and we cannot send them back to danger based on the manner of their entry," he said.se crossing over the southern border between ports of entry.

Judge Jon S. Tigar of the US District Court for the Northern District of California said that a policy announced November 9 barring asylum for immigrants who enter outside a legal check point '"irreconcilably conflicts" with immigration law and the "expressed intent of Congress."

"Whatever the scope of the President's authority, he may not rewrite the immigration laws to impose a condition that Congress has expressly forbidden," Tigar wrote, adding that asylum seekers would be put at "increased risk of violence and other harms at the border" if the administration's rule is allowed to go into effect

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn...ons/index.html


Sorry using my phone I believe I missed the last paragraph.

Hopefully this pushes for border wall daca deal on the budget dec 7th

Must install motion sensing bazooka turrets on the border

I don't know what to make of this caravan thing anymore... other than that it was a godsend to all the anti-immigration people in Congress.

99% of them won't be allowed in.

However , the danger lies with that odd one. The odd duck.
That lucky Pablo or Maria that gets in somehow and then makes alot of money (in their country's currency, of course) doing all sorts of odd jobs and then start posting pictures on their profiles, bragging to the folks back home of how good they have it etc.

Boom.It's over.

Then, you'll get x10 more caravans.

More caravans = more illegal immigration= more future dreamers= More hardass anti-immigration laws and congressmen.

It never ends

No more Latino immigrants!

Build the wall!

What’s wrong with Latino immigrants?

Latino immigrants are unskilled and have tons of kids to get benefits.

You fucktard.

Wow racist much?

Yes, that's true. However, I strongly disagree with you.

A large portion of Latino immigrants are "unskilled", as in with low levels of formal education.

That's a fair assertion.

However, they are hardworkers and have a great work ethic. They contribute to the USA as farmer workers, construction workers, cleaners etc.

You like to eat , right? Do you like having fresh tomatoes and veggies available to you at a low cost like we take for granted here in Anytown USA?!

You can thank a Latino migrant for that. You are benefiting from his labor.

You like to live in a nice , warm house , right?! To have a shelter?!

Probably a Latino helped build that .

Latinos contribute so much to this country and get so much hate.

As far as their kids go, they will be fine. They will integrate in the society and move on to higher paying and more prestigious occupations like many forum members here already have.