New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Amended Answer

legendver2 · 03-07-2019, 06:22 AM

https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...ed-Answer.html

Quote:

Defendants admit that DACA is substantively unlawful, and on that basis aver that the Court need not reach the remainder of Plaintiffs’ arguments. Defendants also admit that Plaintiffs are entitled the relief they seek in this case, but aver that if the Court determines that permanent relief is warranted notwithstanding the conflicting injunctions, the Court should stay its order for a minimum of 14 days so the United States can seek stays of all the DACA orders in the respective courts of appeals and the Supreme Court.

ELI5 anyone?

Red neck · 03-07-2019, 09:04 AM

Can someone translate.
My understanding is that DACA is illegal but we need a permanent solution and something about 14 days

frbc13 · 03-07-2019, 09:55 AM

It means we're entitled to a free one way plane ticket by the federal government.

Demise · 03-07-2019, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red neck

Can someone translate.
My understanding is that DACA is illegal but we need a permanent solution and something about 14 days

Yeah no, this document is 42 pages of one sentence "We agree" and "We disagree" responses to something filed previously. Going through it all would result in something at least twice the length.

Another thing to consider is that Texas v. Nielsen is an unusual case where United States is technically a defendant but they're not arguing against the plaintiffs. This is why New Jersey as well as few other states and organizations stepped in.

legendver2 · 03-07-2019, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demise

Yeah no, this document is 42 pages of one sentence "We agree" and "We disagree" responses to something filed previously. Going through it all would result in something at least twice the length.

Another thing to consider is that Texas v. Nielsen is an unusual case where United States is technically a defendant but they're not arguing against the plaintiffs. This is why New Jersey as well as few other states and organizations stepped in.

What does the quoted part mean though?

Got_Daca · 03-07-2019, 01:03 PM

They are readying the Vaseline

DACA-IR-DA · 03-07-2019, 06:38 PM

Replace with Dream Act.

Demise · 03-08-2019, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by legendver2

What does the quoted part mean though?

It's a brief, it doesn't mean anything. Moreover it's a brief from a party that doesn't support DACA's existence.

S	M	T	W	T	F	S
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

They need you!

Forum links

Resources

Join our list

National calendar of events

July

New filing in State of Texas et al v. Nielsen et al: Amended Answer