• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

July

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

A call for clarity, honesty

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
04-01-2010, 12:51 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Aug 2009
3,161 posts
dtrt09
0 AP
A call for clarity, honesty
By Ruben Navarrette, UNION-TRIBUNE COLUMNIST

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 at 12:04 a.m.


What’s gotten into Lindsey Graham?

The Republican senator from South Carolina has been working with New York Democrat Chuck Schumer to achieve what Graham calls the “tough heavy lift” of immigration reform. The two have spelled out the basic framework of the legislation, which is yet to be introduced but enjoys the support of the White House.

So a lot of people were caught off guard when Graham recently threatened to back away from his own legislation. The apparent about-face probably wasn’t because of pushback from the right. Graham has already stared down that storm. A few years ago, the senator caught grief after a speech to the National Council of La Raza in which he promised immigration reform and said the way to do it was to “tell the bigots to shut up.” For that dose of candor, right-wing bloggers dubbed him “Grahamnesty.”

Yet Graham doesn’t seem to care about any of this. Why else partner with Schumer to resurrect the immigration debate? What Graham does appear to care about quite a bit is bringing to that debate a couple of things it lacks: clarity and honesty.

Clarity: In 2008, Graham traveled the country stumping for his friend and colleague Sen. John McCain, who had stuck his neck out to forge a bipartisan immigration compromise with Sen. Ted Kennedy. All that McCain got in return were headaches from fellow Republicans and heartache from Hispanic voters who, as loyal Democrats, cast two-thirds of their ballots for Barack Obama.

This would be the same Obama who in his brief time in the Senate worked with Democratic leader Harry Reid to derail comprehensive immigration reform by proposing “poison pill” amendments that Democrats knew Republicans, who were then in the majority, wouldn’t support. The poison was inserted at the behest of organized labor, which made it clear it opposed any plan that included Chamber of Commerce-friendly language about importing hundreds of thousands of additional guest workers.

But try telling that story to the Beltway media, much of which resists anything that clashes with its existing narrative that it was Republicans alone who killed immigration reform, all evidence to the contrary. Graham has tried to set the record straight without much success.

I understand where that narrative comes from. After all, Republican lawmakers can be loud and obnoxious when the immigration debate comes up, including a willingness to pander to racists to scare up votes and political contributions. But in recent years, Republicans have also been in the minority and thus largely powerless to stop legislation that Democrats are united around and determined to pass. See: health care reform.

You won’t find such Democratic unity in the immigration debate, not with many Democratic lawmakers doing labor’s bidding and others buying into the fable that legalizing illegal immigrants would hurt U.S. workers by providing competition.

Honesty: Graham has also taken it upon himself to spell out that what happened in the health care debate hurt the chances for immigration reform.

When the Democrats resorted to the desperate tactic of passing health care reform through reconciliation, a lot of the congeniality you would expect to find in the Senate went right out the window. Now hard feelings and acrimony are the order of the day.

During a recent appearance with Schumer on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Graham said that he was just being honest when he predicted before the vote that, if health care passed in such a manner, it would “pretty much kill any chance of immigration reform passing the Senate this year.” And indeed, after the vote, McCain vowed that there would be no more cooperation with the White House on any issue this year. Graham is also trying to put pressure on the White House to get off the sidelines and work toward immigration reform by drawing attention to the fact that the Obama administration hasn’t lifted a finger in this regard.

Despite his threat to walk away from the issue, Graham said he would “keep working with (Schumer) on immigration.” But he’s obviously fed up with the mainstream media insisting that Republicans are the main obstacles to achieving immigration reform. And he’s tired of being asked by the White House to deliver the votes of Republicans when it’s the support of Democrats that really matters.

Who can blame him? Still, leadership requires that he finish what he started, and fix an immigration system that is badly broken. Let history take care of the rest.

Navarrette can be reached at [email protected].

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2...arity-honesty/
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dtrt09
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dtrt09
#2
04-01-2010, 12:57 AM
Senior Member
From West Hollywood
Joined in Sep 2007
1,234 posts
angeleno's Avatar
angeleno
59 AP
Wow, when will this loser stop being a Republican brown noser?
__________________
American Foundation for Equal Rights
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
angeleno
View Public Profile
Send a private message to angeleno
Visit angeleno's homepage!
Find all posts by angeleno
#3
04-01-2010, 05:49 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2010
343 posts
dreamberry's Avatar
dreamberry
210 AP
You want some clarity and honesty? Check out this article.

I don't think Senator Graham thought it would be this difficult.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamberry
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamberry
Find all posts by dreamberry
#4
04-01-2010, 01:31 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2010
111 posts
dreamality
0 AP
wasnt the outline introduced a couple of weeks ago.
ugh, what are they waiting for to start crafting that bill.
its april already!
im sick of graham excuses and lies.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
dreamality
View Public Profile
Send a private message to dreamality
Find all posts by dreamality


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.