• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

August

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Republican suggests immigration reform can wait (Not Really News)

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
04-25-2010, 04:12 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Sep 2007
1,386 posts
Mona Lisa's Avatar
Mona Lisa
0 AP
Washington (CNN) – Sen. Saxby Chambliss said Sunday that Democrats are playing politics with the issue of immigration reform. The Georgia Republican also suggested that the Senate should have higher priorities than immigration reform and energy legislation just now.

“I’m not sure how you can really justify bringing either one of them up at this point,” Chambliss said on CNN’s State of the Union.

He added that the Senate has yet to make any progress on the budget or the many appropriations bills necessary to fund the federal government’s operations.

“We’ve got a lot of work left on our plate between now and the end of the summer,” he said, noting that the Senate was about to take up financial regulatory reform. “I’m not sure where you find the time to deal with these other major issues,” Chambliss told CNN Chief Political Correspondent Candy Crowley.

Asked by Crowley whether political considerations are pushing Democrats to move immigration onto the front burner during this midterm election year, the Republican did not hesitate.

“Oh sure, I mean it’s pretty clear that’s what this is all about," he responded.

Pointing to the Bush administration’s failed efforts to pass an immigration reform bill in 2007, Chambliss said A comprehensive overhaul of the immigration system – including dealing with those living in the U.S. illegally – was “not practical” until the country’s borders are sealed.

“Until you seal the border, trying to have an overall package on immigration just simply can’t be done,” Chambliss told Crowley.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...id=2d8AXHhPI3_
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Mona Lisa
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Mona Lisa
Find all posts by Mona Lisa
#2
04-25-2010, 04:16 PM
BANNED
Joined in May 2009
6,763 posts
DA User
0 AP
Atleast they are very much interested now that they want border security.

Path to legalize the undocumented can be compromised.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
DA User
View Public Profile
Find all posts by DA User
#3
04-25-2010, 06:11 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Apr 2009
617 posts
gebodupa
0 AP
Quote:
the budget or the many appropriations bills necessary to fund the federal government’s operations.
Wow, this guy is just sickening.

If he had said: economy, I would have said "ugh...but does have a point", climate...I would have laughed because anybody that suggests that climate is more important than immigration has serious issues, but to say that budget appropriations, the most corrupted and vile part of the federal system....the so called golden faucet where everyone just has their hand in someone else's pocket, should have priority? That's just ridiculous.

I've worked in a federally sponsored university lab for a couple of years now and the amount of backroom negotiations and deals that goes on, even on the scientific level, in order to receive substantial federal grants is beyond belief. Not to mention that the science sector at most universities doesn't even include things like lobbying and such, where most of the really dirty stuff happens.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
gebodupa
View Public Profile
Send a private message to gebodupa
Find all posts by gebodupa
#4
04-25-2010, 08:43 PM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
Now everyone knows that Reid is most likely playing politics. If he can't deliver CIR then hispanics will surely stay home this fall.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sonawabich
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sonawabich
#5
04-25-2010, 10:48 PM
Senior Member
From L.A., California
Joined in Oct 2007
960 posts
kenny1314
0 AP
LOL, immigration reform can wait? then how about climate bill? this is bullshit, because republican afraid to talk about immigration reform. if Democratic want to pass immigration reform this year, they can do the same thing AS Health care reform. man put the country's safety and people first, then talk about other issue.
__________________
OBAMA-BIDEN 2008
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
kenny1314
View Public Profile
Send a private message to kenny1314
Find all posts by kenny1314
#6
04-25-2010, 10:59 PM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
They said the same thing about HCR, remember how GOP tried to restart the whole debate after Christmas? after almost of year of debate they wanted to start from blank. Certainly, lives up to their name of party-of-NO
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sonawabich
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sonawabich
#7
04-26-2010, 01:03 AM
Senior Member
Joined in Jan 2010
249 posts
Eddy117's Avatar
Eddy117
0 AP
I really fail to see how anyone can honestly say there is a viable way to seal up the borders, but lets say that it were one day possible to actually physically prevent anyone from running across the border or being smuggled in, what about those who came here and overstayed their visas? I know quite a few people who came here like that. How do you prevent that?

I heard some GOP congressmen saying that Reid's sudden shift from climate to immigration was all in the name of scoring political points with the latino community in Nevada but if you really look at how it is, the GOP candidates don't want to vote on a divisive issue such as immigration because they risk losing their base and losing the Latino vote in November. For them it's easier to shoot after the midterm elections but that would only give them a month and a half to even work a bill that has provisions to legalize those already here and to stem the flow of those wishing to come here. CIR might be doomed to fail, but it has a greater chance of being passed now than after the midterm elections before the swearing in of the new congress in December and January-which could be Republican-controlled mind you.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Eddy117
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Eddy117
Find all posts by Eddy117
#8
04-26-2010, 01:24 AM
BANNED
Joined in Mar 2009
1,530 posts
Sonawabich
0 AP
Again, biometric SS card required from ALL persons applying for a job. When the jobs are gone, no illegal/visa overstayer will be able to support themselves. Then they will go home.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Sonawabich
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Sonawabich
#9
04-26-2010, 03:57 AM
Senior Member
From NYC
Joined in Jul 2009
1,222 posts
Dukem88's Avatar
Dukem88
0 AP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddy117 View Post
I really fail to see how anyone can honestly say there is a viable way to seal up the borders, but lets say that it were one day possible to actually physically prevent anyone from running across the border or being smuggled in, what about those who came here and overstayed their visas? I know quite a few people who came here like that. How do you prevent that?

I heard some GOP congressmen saying that Reid's sudden shift from climate to immigration was all in the name of scoring political points with the latino community in Nevada but if you really look at how it is, the GOP candidates don't want to vote on a divisive issue such as immigration because they risk losing their base and losing the Latino vote in November. For them it's easier to shoot after the midterm elections but that would only give them a month and a half to even work a bill that has provisions to legalize those already here and to stem the flow of those wishing to come here. CIR might be doomed to fail, but it has a greater chance of being passed now than after the midterm elections before the swearing in of the new congress in December and January-which could be Republican-controlled mind you.
Agreed. I think if we wait till after midterms like Republicans want it, they will have more of a saying on things and that only means the CIR will have less of a chance to pass(which is basically what you said). But I'm optimistic that CIR will pass because the gov wants to implement that whole biomatric SSNs deal. I can't remember the last time such a big project for indentification came around and the congress didn't pass it.
__________________
"It's never too late to change, never." ~My middle school Dean

ILLEGALS UNITED FEDERATION!
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
Dukem88
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Dukem88
Find all posts by Dukem88


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.