• Home
  • Today
  • Advocacy
  • Forum
Donate
  • login
  • register
Home

They need you!

Forum links

  • Recent changes
  • Member list
  • Search
  • Register
Search Forums
 
Advanced Search
Go to Page...

Resources

  • Do I qualify?
  • In-state tuition
  • FAQ
  • Ways to legalize
  • Feedback
  • Contact us

Join our list

National calendar of events

«  

October

  »
S M T W T F S
 
 
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
 
Sync with this calendar
DAP Forums > DREAM Act > The News Room

Costa Mesa a “Rule of Law City”

  • View
  • Post new reply
  • Thread tools
#1
05-19-2010, 02:12 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2009
171 posts
beans's Avatar
beans
0 AP
The Costa Mesa City Council approved a resolution declaring it would not be a "sanctuary city" for illegal immigrants -- despite complaints from some residents that the vote needlessly inflamed tensions.

The resolution was proposed by Mayor Allan Mansoor, who had become an outspoken critic of illegal immigration.

The resolution declaring Costa Mesa a “Rule of Law City” follows an April news conference in which Mansoor called for stricter regulations to catch illegal immigrants living, working and driving in the city, and his promise to ask for the council’s support.

“The resolution states that Costa Mesa is not a sanctuary city and that it is in fact a rule-of-law city when it comes to support for upholding immigration laws,” Mansoor said before the vote Tuesday night.

Among the ideas Mansoor proposed last month was exploring whether the city could require its businesses to use E-Verify to check the immigration status of prospective employees and whether the city could verify the legality of those seeking business licenses.


The state Assembly candidate also wanted to explore why police sometimes accepted the matricula consular, a form of identification issued by the Mexican government, as a valid form of verification.

“It’s important for the public to know that form of ID is being used and accepted, and it raises questions as to why they don’t have driver’s licenses, a passport or some type of ID that says they have a legal right to work here,” Mansoor said earlier Tuesday.

Some residents are wary.

“Immigrants are part of America,” Silvia Hernandez said. “We work, pay taxes, go to church and participate in our communities. We need a solution that brings people out of the shadows.”

Mansoor, who had said he supported legal immigration, wanted police in 2005 to enforce immigration laws. The proposal sparked citywide conflict and a federal lawsuit accusing him and the city of violating a resident’s 1st Amendment rights. The city prevailed.

At least five residents spoke against Mansoor’s resolution; no one spoke in its favor.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
beans
View Public Profile
Send a private message to beans
Find all posts by beans
#2
05-19-2010, 04:44 PM
Senior Member
Joined in Mar 2006
3,106 posts
VJB2's Avatar
VJB2
0 AP
Sweet Jesus.
  • Reply With Quote
Post your reply or quote more messages.
VJB2
View Public Profile
Send a private message to VJB2
Find all posts by VJB2


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Contact Us - DREAM Act Portal - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.